This is a language problem, not a theological one or a logical one.
AS soon as we say that something is POSSIBLE, it implies that it's also possible that it's not possible. The word "possible" hides a conditional state. Maybe is another word like that.. it means "Yes or no"
Even the wildest...
It just looks like a clever publicity stunt.
It would never work.. we want to FORBID religions?
Did Donald Trump back the idea?
We could maybe not just kill all the jews, but EVERY person of "religion"... make hitler look like a ***** cat.
this is the MOST ridiculous idea ive heard in a long...
They might think the same about your particular brand of religion. To Muslims, perhaps all Christianity represents a false cult. To atheists, perhaps ALL religions are false cults.
It seems plain to me that you like your cult better than the other cults. Happy culting.
Ok, you HAVE to explain to me how I can "reach out and connect to God(s) ATHEISTICLY... this should be rich...
It may come as a shock to some people, but generally speaking atheists don't believe in gods. Remember that?
Could you elaborate?
I'm an agnostic and a skeptic.
Do you consider me, for example, as having underdeveloped spiritual-religious attributes?
Why would I WANT to have more developed spiritual-religious attributes?
Ok, you have no evidence for god.
That's was my point.
I have evidence of nature.
Not of ghosts, goblins or gods.
I HAVE to deny causality?
Gee wiz.
And I didn't want to.
HUH?
I have to do that too?
Well, if you insist, but I usually think for myself, would that be alright?
We do?
I have...
Nobody can deny the existence of Quetzalcoatl, either. I don't see the point.
We have evidence for dark matter.
We have no evidence for Quetzalcoatl, or Santa, either.. except, that certain people believed in these things.
Everyone should know by now in our modern SCIENTIFIC times, that not...
I agree.
But as a wannabe skeptic, I have to give Santa and EB at least a SMALL probability of existing.
I don't have all the data in the universe to check if they aren't there.
I give the same amount of probabilities to gods... I would represent the probability for God's Santa's and EB's...
I bet it's necessary to him subjectively.
True for HIM.. ( or her ) the way a favorite beverage is the best beverage.
It's like Trump is the best debater.
FOR HIM.
As an outsider to faith, I would say the best reason that I abandoned a belief in any gods is because I wasn't ever given OBJECTIVE evidence for one. The only evidence I have been ever given are invalid or unsound arguments, or subjective evidences. Both kinds of "evidence" are quite...