No, silly (I know I shouldn't speak like that to my elders, but it's the internet so who cares, :p). Anyway, nIlagrIvaH is in the shrIrUdram as well (verses I pasted and translated are recited from 1:19-1:52):
vQjBQJqi0Ak
Does his color matter?....
asau yastAmro aruNa uta babhruH suma~NgalaH|
ye chemAgM rudrA abhito dikShu|
shritAH sahasrasho'vaishAgM heDa Imahe||1.7||
This "sun" (i.e. shiva) rises as copper-red (aruNa),
then golden brown (babhruH),
of highly auspicious from,
the (other) thousands of rudra-s...
praNAm,
Both really, I remember there being a verse in the ashvalAyana gR^ihyasUtram pertaining to only dvija-s being allowed to recite the veda-s, and chhAndogyopaniShad 5.10.7 also gives one the impression that varNa is birth-based.
A shUdra can act like a brAhmaNa, sure, but it's not his...
Moved from other thread:
I don't want to get into an argument, but you're being silly. All I am saying is that per varNa dharma, i.e doing your duty as per ones varNa, a shUdra is not supposed to be reciting veda-s or doing sandhyAvandanam, just as I being a kShatriya am not in a position to be...
I believe that buddha is an avatAra of bhagavAn, so could you please show me where you believe I have spoken "ill" of buddha? I don't remember ever having done so. Also, if you believe that me calling Jesus a preta is speaking ill of him, then that's your opinion. However, I do believe that he...
That's not what your quote from sivAnanda saraswatI said though,, you wrote "...who follows the Varnashrama Dharmas, he who worships the Avataras and studies the Vedas, is a Hindu.”
It's not just in the smR^iti-s though, the view that shUdra-s should not recite the veda-s is present even...
I know plenty of shaiva-s who don't worship avatAra-s, does that make them non Hindu? Also, if you follow varNAshrama dharma, shUdra-s cannot recite the veda-s and therefore by default cannot perform sandhyAvandanam. Are you saying that shUdra-s are not Hindus? :rolleyes:
This is the only part of your statements which I don't quite understand, majjanam is an important part of snAnam regardless of whether the water is flowing or not (although I agree that it's better if the water is flowing, like in a nadI), so wouldn't it be preferable to bathe and then pour...
No, it's not Aup, you know how I know? There's already two threads about Nawrooz in the Baha'i forum which state it's on March 20th - 21st, see here and here. Now can you stop wishing people happy "Nawrooz" when been nine days since then?
[B]
praNAm,
I didn't notice your message before, sorry about that.
Anyway, I just erased the t=11. Don't worry about the [B] tags, they aren't necessary, I just like to bold things. Only put the stuff after v, but don't include the stuff after the #, nor the # sign itself in the tags, so for...
Why that reminds me of a marAThI song from the 1941 (I think?) d~nAneshvar movie:
Tnhs9bTPfMU
Sorry, couldn't resist...
Also, all of those words most likely come from saMskR^itam, since "ja" is slightly closer phonetically to "cha" than "za."
Edit: Actually, on second thought, I wouldn't...
Technically the "naw" in nawrooz come from the Avestan word nava, not the nava in saMskR^itam. It's natural for Avestan to have have a word (nava) which is a cognate with the corresponding saMskR^ita word (nava, navIna, etc) because they both come from the same proto-Indo-European root-word...
praNAm Aup,
Why use mleccha (Persian and Aarabi) terms (in your title) when their "New Year's Day" already passed? :p
Anyway, have you ever tried pachadi, it tastes really good (I love South Indian food):
ccrucZPQpCU
praNAm,
Put that stuff after v= in (youtube)....(/youtube) tags (except with brackets, i.e. [] rather than parentheses).
So for your video, you would write it like "IajM-tLxPFc"