You are totally overthinking things, my view of Jesus being a preta comes from the story of Jesus' "resurrection," not from some bauddha AkhyAnam-s. I don't believe Jesus to be supreme lord or savior or what not, but I do accept he had special powers (not aShTasiddhayaH, but jIvan-mR^ityu...
Stating that Christ is irrelevant to Hindu practice is different from saying that he's irrelevant to Hindus. Ask anyone and they would confirm that this is true. The former places a certain condition, whereas the latter is with regards to state of being (and thereby relates to value or...
Please give a better explanation for you claim, because:
1) The pencil does possess a certain degree of worth to you, for if you did not possess it or any other writing utensil, you would be unable to write (in general).
2) The Xbox controller still has a certain degree of relevance, as in the...
If I view someone's being, actions, etc. as entirely irrelevant, then yes, that equates with worthlessness. However, the reverse isn't necessarily true. You must posit an alternative argument in order for me to consider your claim. Merely stating that my view is absurd is little more than an ad...
You stated that Jesus is irrelevant to Hindus, not irrelevant to Hinduism. As it was written, it refers to his state of being, or Jesus as a whole (without qualifiers) is irrelevant to the majority of a certain group of people. I stated that if you consider me a part of that majority, then I...
To the contrary, you're hurting the feelings of preta-s. What if they're reading this thread? :)
My belief is that Jesus is a preta, and I stated that very clearly.
Does one need to be a God or an avatAra to be "relevant"? You stated that Jesus is viewed as irrelevant. This is stating that his being itself is irrelevant, which logically equates to worthlessness.
Their beliefs are irrelevant to me (just as my beliefs should be irrelevant to a Christian...
The first is a typo, the second is just your stylistic preference, and the last is indeed a grammar mistake on my part. :p
So you wouldn't mind if I called you worthless or irrelevant?
I never said you did....
Irrelevant in which sense?
I am an idol worshipper in the views of Paul and...
But yaj~nadharma isn't all there is in Hinduism, right? Perhaps you may not feel it necessary to think of him, but it's rude to call a jIva entirely irrelevant. Semantics, I know. :p
What is offended, their mind or their soul? Paul offends me when he compares things like idol worship and homosexuality to murder; should I now go file a complain to the 2.1 Billion Christians and inform them that they need to change their scripture? Regardless, Christians can pray to Jesus...
praNAm,
Thanks for clearing that up, although I'm not sure I explained my statement well enough. If the acceptance in the first statement ("accepting all") relates to the condition of being, whereas the acceptance in the second statement ("accepting none") relates to possesion or desire, then...
praNAm
What does that mean? I don't seem to get the joke. Where did he state that he was seeing difference. Is it by pointing out that he is went to the website (establishing a kartA-karaNa-karma relationship, and hence a subtle form of ahaMkAra)?
At a svAbhAvika level, that form of "acceptance" you are using as the rAganimmitam is different from that in your former statement. If I understand you correctly, the former statement relates to sAmatva, whereas the latter relates to aparigraha, right?
Oh gosh that annoys me because they carelessly mix up verses of the achyutAShTakam (I have OCD, lol); anyway, isn't it by an Art of Living singer?
There is absolutely no bhakti in that song; I just see kAm and lAlach (perhaps if you understood all of the lyrics you would know what I'm talking...
Meh, I don't really see the purpose of this if you set up your own little pavitrasthAnam or devagRiha at your home. Something about it's bothering me though; what exactly is the use of including the agarbatti if you can't smell it (since it's a "virtual" ArAdhana site)? The nAriyal I can...