Yes, and it appears that Sil heavily quotes from sAnyAl, who is the individual who I referenced for the "****" comment for the lIlAmR^ita, since I have his (sAnyAl's) text. Is that why you think I was supporting kripal, some strange indirect connection? I think you should actually refute MY...
praNAm Treks,
This is off topic, but wow, it seems I used to mess up my recitation (when I was still a Sikh). I used to say ehO chalt mOhI (not iv chalt mOhI), har charaN kamal (not har charaN kaval), and terai nAm vAsA (not terai nAi vAsA). I guess my little nitnem gUTkA must have modernized...
Actually saurabha can refer to anything born from kAmadhenu (i.e. surabhI), which according to the bR^ihatparAsharahorashAstra (adhyAya 31, I think?), would refer to any human, animal, rAkShasa, etc. So yeah, we have a saurabha in Hinduism; millions in fact. :p
Whether the sorabh that shahz is...
You're missing the point, I'm talking about from a strictly historical perspective, in which case it's unlikely that he lived 40,000 years; the same applies for the chiranjIvI-s, sure. :D
None of your points addressed my quotes, so I don't see the point. My verses about rAmakR^iShNa touching the penis of little children and what not were taken from a translation from estudantedavedanta.net translated by shrI mA trust and the vedAnta society (which is comprised BY HINDU-s), not by...
Both you (EyeofOdin and Poeticus) and the Irish people correcting you are wrong to an extent. In Gaeilge, the word would be spelled as Ceilteach (pronounced kind of like "Celt-ukh") in which the "C" isn't a hard sound nor an "s" sound, although I agree that it's closer overall to the hard sound...
Well, kassapa (presuming you're speaking of kassapa buddha and not mahAkassapa [who was a disciple of shAkyamuni buddha, just like Ananda]) likely never existed (no one lives to the age of 40,000 years, lol); the first historical buddha was gautama buddha.
It's okay, I also made a mistake in the response to you. I was on my iPhone when replying and accidentally wrote BBC rather than BBA (bhaktivedAnta book association) or BBT (bhaktivedAnta book trust) because it "spell-corrected" :rolleyes: me, and I didn't notice the change, lol.
Wait, what...
I agree, although it should be written vaiShNavism (or vaiṣṇavism in IAST), and not as vaishNavism, since vaiShNava comes from viShNu (with a ष्) and not vishNu (with a श्) [it ***ses you off when I proofread, so I'm gonna keep doing it until you can deal with...
I am of the view jaina dharma predates the AjIvaka-s and bauddha-s by at least 300 years, if not more. The very early tIrtha~Nkara-s, if they existed at all, likely didn't teach the same principles of present day jaina dharma; however, pAshvanAtha, who probably dates to around the time the...
Well, shakra is indra and indra is shakra, hence why the bauddha-s often call him "shakra devAnAm indra," meaning shakra, indra of the deva-s, and the veda-s also refer to indra as shakra, like in the phrase "átÍdu shakrá ohatendro víshvA áti dvíShaH...bhinát kanÍna odanám pacyámAnam parógirÁ"...
If digambara jaina muni-s did move to Britain or Canada and still wanted to abide by all anuvrata-s, then I presume that they might even be arrested for public indecency, or they might be hit by a woman (or in the case of a sAdhvI, perhaps hit by a man) for exposing their private parts, like...