The Jews say it was unlawful for them to put any man to death.But is this true?
Then said Pilate unto them, Take ye him, and judge him according to your law.
The Jews therefore said unto him, It is not lawful for us to put any man to death, John 18:31.KJV.
Yes I know. It is not normal for me to thank those who disagree with me.
'thank you for disagreeing with me' doesn't quite make sense to me, how about you?
Indeed, but is it true? It is also debatable whether or not she were even married at the time of conception,isn't it?
besides, what do...
And up until this point I have read nothing that justifies these genealogies even appearing in the gospels. It seems that the apologists want to swerve the fact that both Luke and matthew insist they are both the bloodlines of Joseph the father of Jesus.
Thanks for your post columbus, you are...
I like your thinking.:D
Indeed.
Yes good ole Matty always seems to have an Old Testament prophecy on tap doesnt he.
I wonder why he kept silent when it came to the Jews not being allowed to put Jesus to death when there are a few occasions in the New testament that prove to the contrary?
Well isn't this the christian narrative?
It is the Roman soldiers who say>
King James Bible
They said therefore among themselves, Let us not rend it, but cast lots for it, whose it shall be that the scripture might be fulfilled, which saith, They parted my raiment among them, and for my...
This has always baffled me.
This Roman crucifixion party have nailed up Jesus; they then decide to gamble for his robes to fulfil, it is said, a prophecy?
So you want my opinion of Jews (regardless of my question)? Ok.That is quite a broad question for me. I dont feel anything about Jews; Jews are just other people like me and like another human being on the planet, (although some Jews (it is said) believe they are somehow chosen above others)...
I agree. There simply isn't one. Indeed one of those lists would cut the line of Jesus to David if it was that of Mary's.
These genealogical lists are unreliable and pointless. I can only come to the conclusion that they were added to make it appear that Jesus was (1) divine (2) the rightful...
Ok, then leave the thread instead of miserably failing to create conflict.
It didn't stop you joining the topic though did it, Jew or not?
I asked the forum and no religion in particular. You chose to jump in and have now admitted you had no intention of answering the question.
You haven't followed this thread have you? If you have then you may have had trouble understanding the op.
Go and read it again. I ask for no evidence about anything. I asked a simple question.
Here, I will save you the trouble:
Post 1 Page 1
I would only ask for evidence where evidence...
Do you always attempt to answer a question with a question of your own?
The fact is both these gospellers are adamant that both these bloodlines are that of Joseph father of Jesus.
Are not these gospels inspired by god?
They cannot both be correct.
You haven't offered anything in the way...
And who could blame you metis? Only the Christian fanatic.
Just these bloodlines alone throw up endless questions and cast more doubt on the New Testament, before one gets to the more difficult contradictions and anomalies contained in the bible.
We have to ask, why Mathew and Luke even...
NO!
I suggest unless you can give a reasonable explanation as to why these 'GOD INSPIRED' gospels have two contradictory bloodlines for Joseph father of Jesus, then you should simply leave the thread.
So why does one of these list include four women?
Tamar - seduce her father-in-law (Genesis...
And you posting silly rolling eyes say what exactly? My point is that before the apologist make wild suggestions as to the contradictory bloodline lists they should at least read the them before simply repeating what no doubt others have stated before .... and been shot down for.
To say one...