• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. 4

    Young Earth

    Boy, how did I know I would be sent to a evolutionists page? Once again, they offer no evidence at all on a kind of species changing to another species. You knew this was coming... The Truth About Macroevolution
  2. 4

    Young Earth

    If anyone could come up with any kind of proof of macro evolution, I would change to the old earth theory. There has never been any evidence of one species (or kind) changing into another species. Why does everyone think micro=macro?
  3. 4

    Logic vs Belief

    The evidence of the earth being approx 6000 years old matches the flood theory perfectly. Our so called great scientists of the world would look at the aftermath of Mt St Helens and describe the chaos being millions of years old.
  4. 4

    Life

    - sin happens - therefore, __Judgement___________ happens - therefore, sin is judged.
  5. 4

    Life

    Judgement.
  6. 4

    Life

    Well, I would say that mechanism would be sin.
  7. 4

    Life

    I know...pretty cool word huh? In Christianity, we would say they actually were a different type species (kinda, sorda). At the point of creation, they would have been initially programmed to live forever, with no corruption at all. Sin would have changed this, and degraded the gene pool...
  8. 4

    Life

    The science of Creation is in complete accordance with the Second Law. Creation science teaches us that Man and God's other creations were all created with informationally dense, uncorrupted DNA. Adam had more genes and more robust genes than you or I have. This is evident in the extreme age...
  9. 4

    Life

    I would agree that entropy increases as life goes on...but I see this as an example of there being, at one time, a starting point of a purely non entopy environment. In other words, absolutely no chaos or disorder at all. I see that as energy is used, that entropy increases.
  10. 4

    Life

    I guess if I put my faith in upcoming knowledge I will be better off then. :sad:
  11. 4

    Life

    huh? Now the sun is an eternal source of energy?:confused:
  12. 4

    Life

    So, concluding your argument for you, you have faith that we will someday be able to see life be created out of something not living. Right?
  13. 4

    Life

    How is life coming from non life demostrable, repeatable or observable??
  14. 4

    Life

    I would conclude that all graffiti is painted by humans. It seems to me that non-creationists are the ones that do not use logic in their explanations of things.
  15. 4

    Life

    Ok, but are you serious about billions of friends and chances to drop the letters? For there to be that much time to drop the letters, then energy would have had to of been around for that length of time to drop them. I believe the 2nd law of Thermodynamics would show that as energy is used it...
  16. 4

    Life

    But, that is where it gets very shady to me... the evidence to me shows very distinctly a designer. Have you heard of the scrabble game example? If you were to come upon a scrabble game that someone had dropped on the floor with letters everywhere...and in the middle of the letters was a...
  17. 4

    Life

    Not trying to plead with my question. Just assuming. Going back to my original question though...is it faith to say that life started from non-life at some point?
  18. 4

    Life

    Do you have evidence that of life ever coming from something non living? I understand that at some point there had to be an uncaused first cause...right?
  19. 4

    Life

    Does it take more faith to believe that life comes from non-life than it does to believe in an intelligent designer of life?
  20. 4

    Would men die for something they did not believe?

    NT Manuscripts
Top