Because irrational emotion and rational logic do not both behave under the same rule set. It is possible for me to feel happy and sad simultaneously. It is not possible, not rational or reasonable, to both believe and not believe simultaneously that there is an elephant in my living room.
Can...
A common colloquialism, admittedly. Whereas, the dictionary definition of unhappy is "sad; miserable; wretched". Not trying to pick a fight; just looking to align my stance with yours, as our mutual goal is clarification.
Uh-oh. I was running with unhappy being equivalent to "sad", rather than simply "not happy". I don't want to contradict you as we tag-team George. Shall I defer?
We don't define terms. The terms are already defined. Happiness is an emotion we can experience. Unhappiness is an emotion we can experience. Emotional states are not mutually exclusive; indeed, I'm quite confident that someone who was feeling happy about condition X and unhappy about...
Whether or not any value is contributed by the definition is a purely subjective viewpoint. The word means what it means. I'm sure someone far more qualified than me could speak toward its etymology.
As repeatedly mentioned, for purposes of clarification, additional terms have been...
An analogy I've on occasion tossed around is: positive integers; negative integers; and zero.
The "opposite" of a positive integer, arguably, is a negative integer; and vice versa.
But the more relevant term here would be "non-positive integers". That set includes both zero (analogous to weak...
Hmm. I suppose one can be agnostic toward gnosticism, if you'll pardon the word salad. Strong and weak agnostics? Is the additional clarification necessary or prudent? I'll have to give it some thought, admittedly.
[A]gnosticism speaks toward knowledge claims. As such:
- Gnostics claim that the [non-]existence of gods is knowable.
- Agnostics claim that the [non-]existence of gods is not knowable.
When combined with [a]theism, we discover a matrix of four distinct stances:
- Gnostic theists assert that...
Are you implying that North Koreans are somehow inferior and not deserving of education and enlightenment?
And what are you doing here on this thread, anyway? You've also stated quite explicitly, that "[y]ou might as well give up trying to talk to evolutionists". Have you changed your mind?
I'm glad to hear you state that you care about others. That's a vastly different sentiment, however, than the one you communicated in your previous post, where you stated, quite explicitly, that it was a WASTE OF TIME -- your exact words -- to talk to atheists.
Yet here you are, talking to...