Sachs is right that the Bush administration was arrogant to propose in 2008 that Georgia and Ukraine would eventually join NATO. However, given Russia aggression, it is stupid to suggest NATO should have been disbanded in 1990. Jeffrey Sachs really talks like the Kremlin's mouthpiece. He seems...
That is just fake. Putin did not attend those meetings. It was nowhere close to agreement. Its a story that the far left enjoys repeating. Putin has never wanted anything but unconditional surrender. As he keeps losing thousands of men every month, he may eventually come to agree to something...
I think these are the words of David. They may imply the crucifixion of Jesus, but that does not make the whole book (or books) the 'word of God'.
For instance, here is list of prophecies by Edgar Cayce that seem to have come true. But his words are definitely not the 'word of God'. Edgar...
The only way is to continue arming Ukraine and hope the Russian people will get tired of losing lives and money every month (interest rates are at 21% in Russia). This will take at least 2-3 years.
Ukraine may not last that long because of its smaller population, so Poland may need to provide...
As long as you understand that any non-Putinfan who is against the continuation of war has absolutely no idea how to stop Putin's aggression and end the war. They just want Ukraine to surrender as Putin demands (maybe they do not actually say so)
Some Prophets can make some correct prophecies -Edgar Cayce for instance. That does not make what they say the 'word of God'.
Anyway, which specific prophecies are you talking about?
I did not say anyone who opposed the war wanted unconditional surrender. I said Putin wants unconditional surrender, And all Putin lovers want what Putin wants.
As for those who don't love Putin and are opposed to the war. I don't have any idea what they want to happen. Putin's conditions are...
The argument was before that line. You conveniently ignored it. Here it is again:
It is unconditional surrender because Ukraine cannot put any conditions of its own while negotiating.
Ukraine not being able to put conditions - is otherwise known as unconditional. No conditions from Ukraine...
Yes the US has elected a convicted felon, but Putin is a gangster who has murdered thousands of people. Throwing his own subordinates/friends out of windows is his favorite pass time.
First time, Jesus came as a simple teacher. He brought the message of love and caring for your fellow human beings to everyone.
This time around the Christ will bring a message of Justice and Peace not just to individual humans but to the nations of the world. The Ruling will indirect -...
Giving everything that Putin wants is unconditional surrender. His conditions are that he gets everything he wants - the four provinces completely, Crimea, Ukraine demilitarized, Ukraine neutral without alliances.
It would not be unconditional, if Ukraine could put some conditions of its own -...
Hungary and Serbia or Slovenia can leave if they wish. They are actually a drain on the EU and NATO.
Georgians cannot make their own decisions, Georgia is fully controlled by Putin and Ivanishvili
This is true. But that is not Ukraine's fault. If does deserve to be invaded because US has bases everywhere.
The evidence of Russia's intentions is Russia's control of Georgia and annexation of parts of Georgia.
You can't start a war and then claim you are cornered.
NATO has been eagerly invited by Ukraine and all the eastern members (Baltics, Poland and new ones like Finland, Sweden)
NATO's purpose is defense against aggressive powers like Russia. If there was no NATO, Russia would be in Poland...