dybmh
דניאל יוסף בן מאיר הירש
lol, lol, lol, so, we can take it as you cannot understand Zechariah 13:7 ... thought so.... NEXT.
I have never see such IGNORANCE in one place.
101G.
Post #176.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
lol, lol, lol, so, we can take it as you cannot understand Zechariah 13:7 ... thought so.... NEXT.
I have never see such IGNORANCE in one place.
101G.
so we can take this as you're IGNORANT of these bible facts? thought so... (smile), LOL, LOL, LOL.... YIKES!.
so we can take this as you're IGNORANT of these bible facts? thought so... (smile), LOL, LOL, LOL.... YIKES!.
101G.
I want to elaborate on this point. When we refer to “a person”, we usually mean a personality… the specific set of subjective mental qualities which differentiates one being from another. If we call each person of “the Godhead” a person in that sense, then we are essentially saying that they are three different beings, which of necessity precludes a single God. Know what I’m saying? I had massive problems with the doctrine of the Holy Trinity while growing up as a young Catholic, and more than once questioned the priests and nuns about it.The question begged is “what is meant by a ‘person’?” Are we to think that God is besieged by split-personality disorder? If by “person” one means “individual being”, then the concept of the Trinity is impossible.
Please…what in the heck does this mean, exactly? Sounds like gobbledygook to me; along with all the undefined talk of “persons”, seems like a song and dance intended to obfuscate.ONE PERSON, not separate, nor divided, but EQUALLY Shared in Spirit.
Nothing to see in that cut and past gibberish - down a fallacious rabbit hole of your own creation.see post #149. ...... (smile).
101G.
Personal Opinion? thought so. what you call gobbledygook is Christian doctrine. God in the ECHAD is the Equal share of himself in flesh. this is revealed quickly in Phil. 2:6-8. and throughout the bible. you might need to look into that at Phil 2:6-8. ,,,, (smile)....Sounds like gobbledygook to me; along with all the undefined talk of “persons”, seems like a song and dance intended to obfuscate.
I know because the blind cannot see. and on top of that you cannot prove 101G is in ERROR, for if you could you would have already but you cannot...... (smile).Nothing to see in that cut and past gibberish
Nonsense, get that Greek mythology out of you head. "battling with YHWH?" Oh how IGNORANT.but the "Sons of God" - Were "Sons of God" -- battling with YHWH.
that's the problem right there, LISTEN TO GOD.The perspective of some Bible commentato
and they as well as U are just in ERROR as three left shoes.Sons of the Elohim -- like brother Sataniel --- are Gods - according to the Israelites. If you do not believe in God .. that is fine .. but your perspective has nothing to do with what the Israelites Believed .. IsraEL people of EL
to MANY, not ALL.
it's amazing how Illiterate many are concerning the word of God. it's written before one's eyes, and yet many refuse to open a bible dictionary and educate oneself. and "PRAY" to God for revelation? it is evident, that isn't happening either.
it's amazing in this electronic age men are more IGNORANT now than before. it's just a shame.
That is so funny. There is no such thing as “Mother’s day”!! And you talk about people being ignorant - check the beam in your eye…. Oh, you can’t, cos the beam is to large in both your eyes.Oh by the way.... to all Mothers ... "Happy Mothers Day".
101G.
What you said is true.Please…what in the heck does this mean, exactly? Sounds like gobbledygook to me; along with all the undefined talk of “persons”, seems like a song and dance intended to obfuscate.
It was a tongue-in-cheek remark!!
Can you expand on what you mean. There are many ideologies expressed in this forum that I have never heard before. It sounds like you have yet another trinitarian-based ideology yet still correct that Jesus is not God!
The part that flummox me is how it is said that God is Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
What are you saying?
Or, as I was ultimately (after much questioning) told in my Roman Catholic boyhood, “It is a mystery of God which we must just accept”. I, for one, have never been able to accept that, despite my deep and abiding love of mystery.[* It is highly unlikely they will answer in such a short statement. It will usually be some long drawn out deceptive squibble since they would recognise the trap they would put themselves into if they answered honestly.]
GINOLJC, to all.That is so funny. There is no such thing as “Mother’s day”!
Please just reply to the question with whatever context you feel you desire - preferably it is from a true Christian perspective and not one that repeats the oh-so-error-prone trinity or modalist ideology.Above, we read you asking me if I can expand on my comment about why Jesus is not God, despite God being Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
To that request, I reply that I am happy to try to expand on it but, that in order to do so in a manner that may make more sense to you, it would help if I knew some things about you: your approximate age, the country you grew up in, what you do for a living.
I don’t ask out of curiosity. I ask because such things help me choose suitable parables with which to expand on what I mean. For instance; there is little point in me trying to use metaphors and ideas from Peruvian culture, if you grew up in Iceland are not familiar with Peruvian culture - and viceversa; no point in using references from Icelandic culture, if you are Peruvian and not familiar with Icelandic culture. But, say that you are a Peruvian social anthropologist - that changes that, right? Likewise, age matters in many ways also.
It’s perfectly fine if you do not wish to share contextual information about yourself; I don’t take it personally. But there is no point in me elaborating on my first comment through concepts that don’t provide you with anything to reflect further upon.
Humbly,
Hermit
Thanks.Or, as I was ultimately (after much questioning) told in my Roman Catholic boyhood, “It is a mystery of God which we must just accept”. I, for one, have never been able to accept that, despite my deep and abiding love of mystery.
101G, How is it that some one can be EQUAL TO GOD if he IS GOD?To many, not all
for those who believe in a trinity of persons of God, QUESTION. "how much of the Spirit was in Christ when he G2758 κενόω kenoo (ke-no-ō'). himself while in flesh?". for if he's separate and distinct, as many say, and God is only "ONE" Spirit, so, how much of the Spirit was G2758 κενόω kenoo (ke-no-ō') for the one Person whom many calls son? was it 1/3 of the Spirit G2758 κενόω kenoo (ke-no-ō')? or all of the Spirit, or none of the Spirit? which one?
for the scriptures are clear, Philippians 2:6 "Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:" Philippians 2:7 "But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:"
so, he was in the FORM/Nature of God, which is Spirit, but was G2758 κενόω kenoo (ke-no-ō') made empty. ..... So, to all my trinitarians and alike HOW MUCH OF THE SPIRIT WAS G2758 κενόω kenoo (ke-no-ō') or made empty.
101G will be looking for anyone to answer. ..... Thanks in advance.
101G.
Agreed!The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.