Having the Central Government decide abortion is a threat to Democracy, since centralized control is really Socialism and not Democracy. When did any Socialist country give up power, to their states? The USSR or United Soviet Socialist Republic enveloped many countries and imposed centralized control. In a true Democracy, the voters would decide and the Central Government would become public servants who makes things happen. Socialism is the other way around.
Abortion is a threat to Democracy, if done by centralized decree. I would actually prefer the individual decide. However, this would mean abortion would have to become similar to the right to bear arms. You would need to provide for yourself, so there is no government quid pro quo, but rather it comes down to your own choice. The Government does not provide guns to the poor or to females who want one, but cannot afford one. If you a single mother with children, within a crime infested DNC run inner city, you cannot request a free gun to protect the family. That mother would need to save her money and buy her own. That is how abortion should be.
If we did it the Democratic way, and each person could decide, abortion would be treated the same way as guns; an adult decision based on self reliance. Rights are for adults and not dependent children. The right to vote is not given to dependent children. Calling crap candy does not make it so. The two year old does not vote or buy guns. Any adult woman can now save her money and make a trip to the next state if need be. This is the 21st century. Women said they wanted to be treated as equal to men, and not place on a pedestal prison.. We need the modern women to man up. States make gun laws but do not provide guns, even with the right to bear arms. Many states set up obstacles, to make sure there is an adult is in the room when guns are bought. We need women to man up and become adults.
Abortion, like slavey, was about human rights. The DNC was/is against human rights in both cases with their stance on slavery leading to the Civil War. Half the DNC wanted a second slave country, that did not see slaves as human, any more than the current DNC sees the unborn as human. In both cases, they tried to rationalize making the slaves and now the unborn, appear less than human, to justify their abuse of both of them via Government overreach. Both could be killed since they were property of an owner; women's body is her slave plantation. Only the slave owner had rights. Sound familiar? The DNC recycles their playbook.
At least if we let the states decide, we will not have another national Civil War. Such wars, if they occur will be more limited to some states The Federal Government can step in to keep the peace. I did not wish to be under a centralized Socialist slave country, where the most innocent among us can be treated like fire wood; sold and burnt. Inhumane is a common thread in the DNC.
