Just_me_Mike
Well-Known Member
You have my prayers, money will be of no value on the 22nd.why hasn't anyone who believes the world will end on the 20th hasn't deposited any money into my paypal account?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You have my prayers, money will be of no value on the 22nd.why hasn't anyone who believes the world will end on the 20th hasn't deposited any money into my paypal account?
Will you send me all of your soon to be worthless money on the 21st?You have my prayers, money will be of no value on the 22nd.
You're on their Rapture to Righteousness boarding list. Your ticket is in the mail.why hasn't anyone who believes the world will end on the 20th hasn't deposited any money into my paypal account?
I have not much left, just a few hundred dollars... Plus I can't mock God...Will you send me all of your soon to be worthless money on the 21st?
It's OK...you'd be mocking me...I like that.I have not much left, just a few hundred dollars... Plus I can't mock God...
No, you see since I believe this will happen, it also means you will face judgment and I know you will have no need for money. On the other hand if you don't face judgment you will join those chosen to go to heaven and will still need no money.It's OK...you'd be mocking me...I like that.
Oh,no....it would mean that you're humoring a heathen who really likes money.No, you see since I believe this will happen, it also means you will face judgment and I know you will have no need for money. On the other hand if you don't face judgment you will join those chosen to go to heaven and will still need no money.
If I gave you my last bit of money it would mean I doubt my beliefs, and my God.
When one has accepted death, understand what death is, and know without death there is no life, and know death is the ultimate peak of life, and know I was never born never died.....and know I am ETERNAL; WOULD i be worried about death?Your area will probably be first. I hope the best for you and your loved ones. I really do!
Matthew 24:36 was absolutely true during the church age, but that ended, and now that verse doesn't apply. Please read 1st Thessalonians 5, you will see what happens to those that think no one can know, it warns right before the end many will preach matthew 24:36, and then sudden destruction will come to them.
There is still 12 days left though, I hope God opens your eyes and many others before it is too late.
I have not much left, just a few hundred dollars... Plus I can't mock God...
Which church friend? Those in Alabama that have been burned by racists whites, those in Africa or China that have been utterly destroyed, those all around the world that have been brought to rubble from natural disasters?Christ who said the gates of hell would not prevail against the church.
2nd Thessalonians[14] And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.
[15] Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works.
The temple of God friend was the church, and now Satan and all his ministers are over the churches. There is a difference in the invisible eternal church of all the believers from beginning to end, and a multitude of separated denominated churches scattering the world. To say all the hundreds of denominations actually represent Jesus is an insult.[3] Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
[4] Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.
[5] Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?
You have my prayers, money will be of no value on the 22nd.
I sense your genuine concern here. And so I hope you sense mine as well. Camping has been wrong. He has been eager, and in the eagerness has been wrong. He is a dedicated student to the bible, and as such being in the public eye he will make mistakes. However, in my opinion, the mistake here would be to dismiss all his work for his errors. After spending much time really reading his work, it would be impossible to read the bible without his influence on that reading.Please tell me you are not one of those who are squandering everything they have because you truly believe you will not need anything after May 21? You really have that much faith in a man who has been wrong time and time again? You won't even entertain the slightest possibility that he could be wrong once more?
Look, does your god not want you to be smart? Isn't it said that "God" helps those who help themselves? Aren't you warned about false prophets? Do you think your god will be proud of you for taking this man, this extremely likely false prophet, so seriously that you cripple yourself and your ability to fend for yourself and your loved ones? IF Camping is wrong, and it is VERY likely he is, then you will have followed a false prophet to self-ruin. If your god helps those whom help themselves and you are helping to dig your own financial ruin, in which direction do you think your god will help you when life goes on as normal on May 22?
I see that you're desire to be right is greater than saving a human being from believing a lie which could cause physical and pscychological harm to him and his family. You're missing the point. Camping's 7,000 year-ago flood date is not supported by the learned. Even if we take the earliest flood date on this list, we come up way short of Mr. Camping's magic number:
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Circa 3402 BC[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif].............Date of the Flood from the Alexandrian Septuaginta. [/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Circa 3350 BC [/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]The "earliest date" for the beginning of the Jemdat Nasr Period/Era [/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]according to Maisels (cf. below)[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Circa 3342 BC[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif].............Date of the Flood from the Alexandrian Septuaginta. [/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]([/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Circa 3302 BC[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif].............Date of the Flood from the Vaticanus Septuaginta. [/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif].[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Circa 3242 BC[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif].............Date of the Flood from the Alexandrian Septuaginta. [/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif].[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Circa 3213 BC[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif].............Date of the Flood acording to Flavius Josephus, Jewish Historian. [/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]1st century AD. [/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif].[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Circa 3171 BC[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif].............Date of the Flood from the Samaritan Pentateuch. [/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif].[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Circa 3112 BC[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif].............Date of the Flood from Samaritan Pentateuch. [/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif].[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Circa 3000 BC[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]............Date of the Flood ([/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]David Livingston[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif] Ph.D., of Associates for Biblical Reseach).[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Circa 2960 BC[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]............Maisels' "end" of Jamdet Nasr period (The Shuruppak Flood occuring in this Era).[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Circa 2958 BC[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]............Date of the Flood according to Eusebius' calculation (4th century AD) from the Greek Septuaginta [/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]noted by in the 5th century AD Jerome (Roman Catholic Latin Vulgate Bible). [/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Circa 2950 BC[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]...........Date of the Shuruppak Flood (cf. MacDonald, who allows anywhere from 2950-2850 BC) [/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Circa 2903 BC............Date of the Flood from the Samaritan Bible[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif](cf. below The on-line Catholic New Advent Bible Encyclopedia "Deluge" article). [/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Circa 2900 BC............Date of the Shuruppak Flood according to archaeological findings[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif](cf. below, Professor H.W.F. Saggs circa 2900 BC for the Shuruppak Flood). [/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Circa 2800 BC............The "latest date" for the "end" of the Jemdat Nasr Period or Era.[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Circa 2750 BC[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]The Shuruppak Flood is dated ca. 2750 BC _in_ the Early Dynastic I Period[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]by Trevor Palmer, Nottingham Trent University, United Kingdom (cf. below) [/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Circa 2700 BC[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]............Gilgamesh believed to have been a king of Uruk. In the Gilgamesh Epic [/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]he seeks out the Flood's survivor, Utnapishtim (the Mesopotamian Noah),[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]formerly a king at Shuruppak where he was warned by his god to build a [/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]boat to save self, family and animals against a flood to be sent by the gods[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif] to destroy all mankind.[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Circa 2648 BC[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif].............Dean Coombs ([/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Bible Prophecy website[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]) notes _8_ "possible" dates for the Flood.[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Circa 2600 BC[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif].............Shuruppak limestone bas-relief showing men paddling a boat which might be the[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]"original" boat behind the later "embellished" myths of reed-boats, reed-chests [/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]and the biblical Noah's "Ark."[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]There is more but you get the point. Here's the source for those interested[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Ancient Days :: A Universal Flood: 3000 BC :: by David Livingston[/FONT]
AE are you familiar with the work of Edwin Thiele "the mysterious numbers of the Hebrew kings"?
If so please comment on how this is viewed in the scholar circle. I own it only because it is what Harold Camping used in part for his timeline. It is a great book describing ascension and non-ascension kings and I am not aware of many refutations agains his work.
Thanks...
<snip>No scholar that I have ever read has mentioned him.
That might say something in itself. I've never read Thiele, but apparently he's not important enough to receive mention.
<snip>Edwin R. Thiele (18951986) was an American missionary in China, an editor, archaeologist, writer, and Old Testament professor. He is best known for his chronological studies of the Hebrew kingdom period.
<snip>He obtained a PhD degree in biblical archaeology in 1943. His doctoral dissertation, later published as The Mysterious Numbers of the Hebrew Kings[1] is widely regarded as the definitive work on the chronology of Hebrew kings.[2] He traveled extensively throughout the Middle East in the course of his research.
SourceThiele's chronological reconstruction has not been accepted by all of the scholarly consensus,[9][10] but it should be pointed out that neither has any other scholars work in this field. Yet the work of Thiele and those who followed in his steps has achieved acceptance across a wider spectrum than that of any comparable chronology, so that Assyriologist D. J. Wiseman wrote The chronology most widely accepted today is one based on the meticulous study by Thiele,[11] and, more recently, Leslie McFall: Thieles chronology is fast becoming the consensus view among Old Testament scholars, if it has not already reached that point.[12]
<snip>
<snip> <snip>
Source
Thought this might be of interest, it seems others don't share your views...
It is part of the equation. I simply cited this to show to another that Camping's numbers aren't magical. Then I asked if you had read it, that's all, not challenging you at all, sorry.I don't see how this is relevant, Mike.
This book deals with chronology of kings - he doesn't date the Flood from it.
It is part of the equation. I simply cited this to show to another that Camping's numbers aren't magical. Then I asked if you had read it, that's all, not challenging you at all, sorry.
It is part of the equation. I simply cited this to show to another that Camping's numbers aren't magical. Then I asked if you had read it, that's all, not challenging you at all, sorry.