• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

40% of Americans belive the world was created 6000-years ago

LittleNipper

Well-Known Member
1. Your god is some 3,000 years old, and quite possibly an evolution of the Egyptian god Amen.

2. While Gunfingers's response was quite well put, I will add that it takes a clsoe minded person to ignore the plethora of evidence that proves, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that their opinions are wrong.

My GOD is much older. And if you have no doubts, then you and not I has the closed mind.
 
Last edited:

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
So, why should any REAL CHRISTIAN even try to conform what he has revealed to him by GOD for a pack of opinions from a bunch of people who were never there.
What has happened in the past has left evidence that we can examine. Every piece of evidence we have indicates an old Earth and no global flood, not a young Earth and a global flood.

And it's not like you were there either.
 

AxisMundi

E Pluribus Unum!!!
My GOD is much older. And if you have no doubts, then you and not I has the closed mind.

Prove it. Every bit of evidence I see doesn't support your position.

So, arrest me! The fact is that you were wrong and the Bible is correct using simple math. Obviously, the source was simple enough for anyone to find and fact cannot be plagerized.

The info you posted, and didn't cite, proved you quite wrong all on it's own. It is laughable that you are so desperate to prove a lie that you don't even bother reading what you plagerized.

Is plagerism how you got through school?

So, why should any REAL CHRISTIAN even try to conform what he has revealed to him by GOD for a pack of opinions from a bunch of people who were never there.

You've just described eveyr Christian alive today, and every contributor to the Bible. A "bunch of people who were never there".

Thing is human beings possess the technology and brain power to observe what has been left behind, and what hasn't, and determine what is real and what is fantasy.
 

LittleNipper

Well-Known Member
What has happened in the past has left evidence that we can examine. Every piece of evidence we have indicates an old Earth and no global flood, not a young Earth and a global flood.

And it's not like you were there either.

Evolutionists do not look at every piece of evidence. They certainly pick and choose so that anything that "appears to be out of the parameters of logic would be excluded until such time as it came be understood how exactly it fits into the scheme of humanistic Uniformitatianism.
 
Last edited:

LittleNipper

Well-Known Member
Not so fast. As I pointed out a page or two back, your "simple math" ignores what the Bible says.

And what exactly does the Bible say? Water came up from the ground and also that it rained down from above. By the way, I suspect that the earth's center was not hot like it presently is, when GOD originally created this planet. I feel lead to believe that it was likely fully controlled by GOD until the time of the FALL. After that, GOD may have allowed the "boiler" (as it were) to begin to build up pressure.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Evolutionists do not look at every piece of evidence. They certainly pick and choose so that anything that "appears to be out of the parameters of logic would be excluded until such time as it came be understood how exactly it fits into the scheme of humanistic Uniformitatianism.
What pieces of evidence do you think evolutionists have overlooked?

And what exactly does the Bible say?
It says that there were "high mountains" before the Flood.
 

AxisMundi

E Pluribus Unum!!!
You attack people. You prove nothing with regard to your own belief in evolution. I have a reason to exist. You have nothing.

Thanks for showing me right.

I have no reason to "prove" in the fact of Evolution obn two major counts.

1. It is a scientific fact and widely accepted by the vast majority of the scientific field.

2. You've offered nothing, absolutely nothing, in the way of anything based on scientific principles, plain logic, or simple reality.
 

LittleNipper

Well-Known Member
What pieces of evidence do you think evolutionists have overlooked?


It says that there were "high mountains" before the Flood.

The words “high hills” and “mountains” are the same in the original Hebrew. Again, I have explained that it is much more logical that the Earth had rolling hills and was once a very hospitible place, without dangerous paths for Adam and Eve to travel before the FLOOD. The earth was the perfect place for sinless people to live. GOD used the FLOOD to realign Earth to mirror the dangers that sin had wrought.
 

Apollonius

Member
What does it matter concerning the age of the universe when considered in the balance that it's human recognition of such existence that grants the slightest value to the same.
 

Gunfingers

Happiness Incarnate
The words “high hills” and “mountains” are the same in the original Hebrew. Again, I have explained that it is much more logical that the Earth had rolling hills and was once a very hospitible place, without dangerous paths for Adam and Eve to travel before the FLOOD. The earth was the perfect place for sinless people to live. GOD used the FLOOD to realign Earth to mirror the dangers that sin had wrought.

So the "evidence" that was overlooked was...semantics? Don't you understand that none of this is based on the bible? The bible is irrelevant to the evidence we have that the earth is four billion years old.
 

LittleNipper

Well-Known Member
So the "evidence" that was overlooked was...semantics? Don't you understand that none of this is based on the bible? The bible is irrelevant to the evidence we have that the earth is four billion years old.

The Bible is not irrelevant. GOD has informed us that HE created a finished ecological system that was entirely fit for human habitation within the week HE created it. Part of that perfect ecological system most obviously entailed that it was complete and finished. It contained all the minerals necessary to sustain human kind as GOD designed human life to be.

For man to place an age on this is what is irrelevant.
 

Tristesse

Well-Known Member
The Bible is not irrelevant. GOD has informed us that HE created a finished ecological system that was entirely fit for human habitation within the week HE created it. Part of that perfect ecological system most obviously entailed that it was complete and finished. It contained all the minerals necessary to sustain human kind as GOD designed human life to be.

For man to place an age on this is what is irrelevant.

So god created a perfectly ecological system fit for human life? Then why is it that only about 25%-30% of the earth's surface is hospitable for humans to live? And the earth only makes up about .000000001% of the universe, if even that, it seems like a colossal waste of resources, if god created all of this for us.
 

AxisMundi

E Pluribus Unum!!!
The Bible is not irrelevant. GOD has informed us that HE created a finished ecological system that was entirely fit for human habitation within the week HE created it. Part of that perfect ecological system most obviously entailed that it was complete and finished. It contained all the minerals necessary to sustain human kind as GOD designed human life to be.

For man to place an age on this is what is irrelevant.

Right, of to the ignore bin with you.
 
Top