Applied science in Biology like medicine, diet studies and behavioral sciences are problems in Biology are possibly some of the worst, and not Biology in general. Disciplines, my specialties, such as anthropology, paleoanthropology, paleontology and geology do not have significant problems in repeatability
Can you cite references that provide specifics on which fields are worse instead of vague general statements?
You still have failed to respond to the following fact of science.
Simply the research paper results that are reproducible reinforce the growing knowledge of science over the past hundred years and more, those that are not reproducible are the lessons that contribute to the progress of science.
It may be worth noting that some of the earlier research supporting Einstein's Theory of Relativity were found to be not repeatable. It took later more sophisticated research to confirm Einstein's theory.
The reproducible and predictable research results in usable technology in all fields. A good example reproducibility and predictability in research in Biology is in genetics. This very sound predictability has extended into the real world of identifying and curing inherited diseases and defects, tracing family trees and convicting criminals based on genetics,