40% of peered reviewed scientific articles can't be reproduced

[Justatruthseeker]

To make such boisterous claims, you need scientific peer reviewed research, which is totally lacking,

40% which can’t be reproduced and is useless to begin with....

And this in the medical research field. Willing to bet 98% of evolutionary biology hasn’t been reproduced since it’s all dreams of random mutations over millions of years. Rather hard to reproduce those fantasies....

 

[Darkstorn]

He said about as much as you do. Nothing.

Good point. He said pretty little. So you had to add a lot of your own thoughts into what he said. As in, exactly what i just claimed.

I notice you also continually avoid saying anything to support your faith....

You can't notice that "continually" since i've literally interacted you for the first time ever in the last 10 minutes. You're imagining me as someone else, or you've already labeled me as an atheist.

I've not made any claims that require support. I've made no statements of my beliefs or my faith. You're just wishing i had.

 

[shunyadragon]

4
And this in the medical research field. Willing to bet 98% of evolutionary biology hasn’t been reproduced since it’s all dreams of random mutations over millions of years. Rather hard to reproduce those fantasies....

Do you have a scientific reference to support this religious based assertion.

 

[Justatruthseeker]

All those posts, and all the posts he has done on other forums he inhabits, and never once has this stopped him. So telling him to become a peer reviewed researcher is basically giving him a free pass at making fun of you, because in HIS mind he's entirely 100% certain that the whole thing is just a massive conspiracy.

Another conspiracy nut.

No one has mentioned a conspiracy but those that can’t defend their beliefs.

I certainly think you believe and are not conspiring. I certainly think they believe and are not conspiring. Just as Ptolemy believed and wasn’t conspiring. Didn’t make him right and doesn’t make you right either.

 

[Darkstorn]

Do you have a scientific reference to support this religious based assertion.

Of course he doesn't. He has tons of rhetoric though. Which he's pretty much admitted to anyway. He doesn't need any evidence, he has his feelings.

 

[Justatruthseeker]

Do you have a scientific reference to support this religious based assertion.

Do you have scientific reference to show your million of years mutation has been reproduced? Or is this where you ask the other guy to prove unicorns don’t exist?

 

[Darkstorn]

Another conspiracy nut.

Which conspiracy do i believe in?

No one has mentioned a conspiracy but those that can’t defend their beliefs.

I'm not defending my beliefs. I'm seriously making fun of yours.

I certainly think you believe and are not conspiring. I certainly think they believe and are not conspiring. Just as Ptolemy believed and wasn’t conspiring. Didn’t make him right and doesn’t make you right either.

I've made no claims in any way other than regarding what you're doing. There's very little room here for me being "right" or "wrong" when ALL i'm discussing is your behaviour and argumentation methods. You don't actually know my views.

/E: Judging from the way you use the term "conspiracy nut," to you it seems to mean someone who's IN a conspiracy. OKAY. Doesn't that just verify what i said?

 

[shunyadragon]

Do you have scientific reference to show your million of years mutation has been reproduced? Or is this where you ask the other guy to prove unicorns don’t exist?

Face it you are clueless to science with no education and a religious agenda.

 

[Justatruthseeker]

Which conspiracy do i believe in?



I'm not defending my beliefs. I'm seriously making fun of yours.



I've made no claims in any way other than regarding what you're doing. There's very little room here for me being "right" or "wrong" when ALL i'm discussing is your behaviour and argumentation methods. You don't actually know my views.

/E: Judging from the way you use the term "conspiracy nut," to you it seems to mean someone who's IN a conspiracy. OKAY. Doesn't that just verify what i said?

Exactly, you think I think it’s a conspiracy.....

Conspiracy nuts see conspiracies where none exist.

 

[Justatruthseeker]

Face it you are clueless to science with no education and a religious agenda.

In other words you can’t bring forth citations to support your millions of years of change through mutations.

You could of just said so and not wasted time rambling and trying to make the other guy prove unicorns don’t exist....

 

[Darkstorn]

Exactly, you think I think it’s a conspiracy.....

Conspiracy nuts see conspiracies where none exist.

What's a conspiracy?

 

[Justatruthseeker]

What's a conspiracy?

If you don’t know then why would you think I thought that to begin with?

 

[Darkstorn]

If you don’t know then why would you think I thought that to begin with?

Think what?

 

[Justatruthseeker]

Think what?

You are becoming incoherent in your ramblings.....

Forget what you said earlier? It’s only been a few posts....

 

[Darkstorn]

You are becoming incoherent in your ramblings.....

Forget what you said earlier? It’s only been a few posts....

Your questions contain lead-ins. I'm not going to answer questions where the only answer is something you want to hear, in a way YOU'd like. Rather, i'm focusing on you putting words into my mouth:

Exactly, you think I think it’s a conspiracy.....

Conspiracy nuts see conspiracies where none exist.

You said there in plain speech "exactly, you think it's a conspiracy" even though i never implied that i think it's a conspiracy. Therefore, i'm asking you: "What conspiracy is that?"

And you have failed to provide an answer. Therefore, my answers to your questions are valid.

 

[Polymath257]

Ahhh, you mean like finding a tooth, then imagining an entire lifestyle behind the creature that it belonged to?

This kind of knowing? Sounds more like wishful daydreaming...

There is more information in some teeth than you might think. For many mammals, teeth can distinguish between major groups, for example the differences between felines and canines. The tooth can give information about what is eaten and the size can give information about the size of the animal.

 

[Subduction Zone]

The measurement of millions of years. What happens in those millions of years is the fantasy.....

Nope, once again you can't do the physics. But I post all sorts of evidence of strata and formations that take millions of years to form. Just because you cannot work in the sciences does not mean that others cannot.

 

[tas8831]

There is more information in some teeth than you might think. For many mammals, teeth can distinguish between major groups, for example the differences between felines and canines. The tooth can give information about what is eaten and the size can give information about the size of the animal.

It never ceases to amaze me when people who clearly have zero experience with things like paleontology or anatomy will hurl out these charges and accusations and belittle entire fields of study. The clueless hubris is sickening.

 

[tas8831]

Because economics relies on facts. Evolutionary biology relies on dreams of millions of years......

Like the fact that 'trickle down' economics doesn't work? Yet is still advocated by the GOP?

 

[tas8831]

Convicting criminals based upon genetic tests that have nothing to do with comparing segments of one genome and matching it to random segments from another genome. Correct?

One to one matches. Randomly matching segments would not provide the adequate reliability needed.

I cannot believe you are still slinging this poo.....