Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
In the case of that city it is both.Manly is a city in Australia, not a statement on masculinity
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
In the case of that city it is both.Manly is a city in Australia, not a statement on masculinity
I have no idea what that means.If they stood by their convictions they would have drawn the line WAY before this issue.
You really don't believe in freedom of expression? Seriously?Do you think a person should be forced to get a vaccination?
Or indeed that a child should be forced to give birth? (The recent case of the 10 old child who would have been forced by law to give birth after she was raped?)
Or does that not matter in the long run?
Merely curious since that appears to be the red topic button right now is all
“By the fruits ye shall know them” indeed.
Consistency my friend
Homophobia is rather strong in US professional football too. In all of its history only one player has come out while still playing:
Homosexuality in American football - Wikipedia
Forgive the ignorance of this Canadian, but I'd expect that a team named the Manly Sea Eagles would be pretty gay to begin with.
I mean, it's a team name that would be right at home in my friend's gay dodgeball league.
The gambling, idolatry, not acknowledging Jehovah, drunkenness, working on the Sabbath, they don't mind any of this stuff going on.I have no idea what that means.
Glad I'm not the only one who laughed at that. It also got me thinking Family Guy needs to do a musical number about them.BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
Literally laughed out loud at this, and it's pretty much on the money.
FWIW, Manly is a quite nice beachside suburb on the northern side of Sydney. Hence 'Sea Eagles'.
That doesn't matter to the issue. No one should be forced to support a cause they don't believe in.The gambling, idolatry, not acknowledging Jehovah, drunkenness, working on the Sabbath, they don't mind any of this stuff going on.
Homophobia is rather strong in US professional football too. In all of its history only one player has come out while still playing:
Homosexuality in American football - Wikipedia
You are being inconsistent with your reasoning again.I have no idea what that means.
Oh, I realize that the team name origins have nothing to do with homoeroticism, but it sure does sound like an allusion to homoeroticism.Which part of the name? Manly is the name of the suburb where they originated and Sea Eagles are Australia's 2nd largest bird of prey.
What is happening does not necessarily mean homophobia.
How? Do you believe we should be able to force you to wear a " Jesus loves you" T shirt?You are being inconsistent with your reasoning again.
Are you sure about that?Oh, I realize that the team name origins have nothing to do with homoeroticism, but it sure does sound like an allusion to homoeroticism.
How? Do you believe we should be able to force you to wear a " Jesus loves you" T shirt?
The 2nd link doesn't say anything about Ian Roberts though it is titled "Ian Roberts speaks out...."
Sea Eagles legend Ian Roberts, who was the first rugby league player to come out as gay, was devastated.
"It's sad and uncomfortable. As an older gay man, this isn't unfamiliar. I did wonder whether there would be any religious pushback. That's why I think the NRL have never had a Pride round," Roberts said to The Daily Telegraph.
"I can promise you every young kid on the northern beaches who is dealing with their sexuality would have heard about this."
I work in a hospital setting, and we try to be inclusive. We also are affiliated with a Christian denomination. We operate under equal opportunity laws, so we hire everyone not only Christians, however in training we are all asked to represent Christ. So even the non Christians are tasked with acting like Christians. That doesn't mean they have to pray or anything. This creates a diverse environment with an interesting flavor -- perhaps awkward. It is a tiny bit like your t-shirt situation. Not everybody here wants to identify as Christian, yet we all work at a Christian affiliated hospital. Its not really a personal sexual statement though, either.
Now I imagine what would happen were we all asked to wear gay pride t-shirts. (This would probably not happen by the way, but it could happen. They do occasionally order us to wear various garments with slogans.) First thought that would cross my mind would be "I'm not gay. This shirt does not represent me." I would feel like wearing it made people think I was gay and that I wanted people to pay attention to the sexual side of my life, like an invitation to talk about sex with me. In real life I want no one to ask questions about my sex life. I want no conversations about that. I might wear the shirt just that day at work but would not wear it outside and would change immediately after work. I don't like drawing attention to myself, particularly not if its of a sexual nature.
Beyond that I have no insights into this sports club incident. I think its just kind of funny what happened and that there's no real harm since nobody has been forced to represent anything they didn't feel comfortable with. I guess its just how things are when you're in a group with individualism. The alternative is no individualism and groupthink instead, which is possible, too. People do live that way. The occasional faux pas seems like a small price to pay.
They aren't forced. They're completely free to find other employment. I'm sure that a top-tier football team would have no shortage of talented players happy to replace them and wear the jersey.Good for them for standing by their convictions. Does anyone really think people should be forced to wear gay pride apparel?
That's ignorant. You don't believe players should have freedom of expression? I guess you would be ok with them all being forced to wear white pride affirming shirts if one of the members was a skinhead too?They aren't forced. They're completely free to find other employment. I'm sure that a top-tier football team would have no shortage of talented players happy to replace them and wear the jersey.
When one is on the job the expression of certain rights have to be postponed. One is always free to quit.That's ignorant. You don't believe players should have freedom of expression? I guess you would be ok with them all being forced to wear white pride affirming shirts if one of the members was a skinhead too?