Could be. Have you seen this? A web guide to the cicadas of Australia
Those are ocelli (singular ocellus). They are simple eyes.
Thanks for the link, I will look at it shortly but I want google ocelli first.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Could be. Have you seen this? A web guide to the cicadas of Australia
Those are ocelli (singular ocellus). They are simple eyes.
Those are ocelli (singular ocellus). They are simple eyes.
There is an amazing amount of information available on the internet these days. If this had been available to me 30 years ago, there is no telling what I could have gotten done as a student. I guess I'll have to do some of that now.Thanks for the link, I will look at it shortly but I want google ocelli first.
They've had a long time to evolve them. Invertebrate eyes are Cambrian.This is one of the most interesting things I've come across for a long time. It seems insects are way more advanced than us mammals in the eye department.
There is an amazing amount of information available on the internet these days. If this had been available to me 30 years ago, there is no telling what I could have gotten done as a student. I guess I'll have to do some of that now.
They function as light detectors. Mostly for navigation.
Insects make excellent models for robotics design and that is one reason for it.I'm reading this https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(09)00884-7
"If the fly is caught by a gust of wind and is rolled to the left, the visual field of the left ocellus is suddenly exposed to the darker ground while the right ocellus, now seeing more of the sky, receives much more light. The neural machinery along the ocellar pathway analyses the change in illumination between the left and right ocellus, which tells the fly that it has been rolling to the left."
I was going to say alien landing, but they don't leave silk behind.Just found this in the front yard while watering some pots. It's a round patch of about a metre of silk. I thought it was spider webs but the grass underneath is dead. Maybe some kind of lawn grub did it?
View attachment 83887View attachment 83888
I was going to say alien landing, but they don't leave silk behind.
It seems rather large for sod webworm, but I'm not a turf entomologist, so I'm only aware of them and not familiar with the extent of the damage.
Bear with me. This may sound silly in the wording.I tried googling it but can't find anything. Maybe some kind of fungus.
Spider mites. I think it may be spider mites.Just found this in the front yard while watering some pots. It's a round patch of about a metre of silk. I thought it was spider webs but the grass underneath is dead. Maybe some kind of lawn grub did it?
View attachment 83887View attachment 83888
I completely forgot about the possibility of spider mites. I've only seen the damage of Tetranychus urticae (two-spotted spider mite) on crop plants and not on turf.I tried googling it but can't find anything. Maybe some kind of fungus.
It's probably not that species according to the first link I sent you, but it is in that family.I completely forgot about the possibility of spider mites. I've only seen the damage of Tetranychus urticae (two-spotted spider mite) on crop plants and not on turf.
Your lawn has the mange.
Bear with me. This may sound silly in the wording.
Is the silky part silky like spider silk or is it filamentous like fungal hyphae and bunch up (compress) without being sticky/webby when it is pinched?
Bogans? I'll look it up.I'm currently stuck in Raymond Terrace watching bogans walk by, it's too early for the meth heads. I digress, when Karen finishes her eye exam and I get home I'll look.
Bogans? I'll look it up.
I wouldn't be too corncerned.