Al-Fatihah
Muslim
Oh bull. That's exactly what you said. It was your "argument" as to why men couldn't love men. Your stupid argument of two "types" of love ONLY. Let me refresh the memories here:A Candid Discussion on Homosexuality | Page 17 | ReligiousForums.com
You declared A to be a man's love and B to be a woman's. Utter nonsense. your whole argument hinged on that men have one type of love and women another. You placed men in the "strong club wielding provider/protector" role and women in the "help I need a man to take of weak little delicate me" role. You argued that two men couldn't actually love each other because two As couldn't function together and vice versa. I already addressed this as well, but you didn't quote that post did you? You didn't address how men and women have both abilities and that a relationship is based upon equal caregiving and protection from both sides.
Response: That's a blatant lie. I never said that, supported by the fact that you cannot quote from anywhere where the words "men do not feel appreciation for being cared for". No where. You are falsely twisting my words because that is the best you can do to defend your severely flawed argument.
So your lying and strawman tactics expose you and make my argument. Another homosexual proves that homosexual sex is based on lust, not love, therefore homosexuality is wrong. As lust involves the idea of using a person sexually for your own pleasure, the same root evil of rape and molestation and since homosexual sex is based on lust, it is wrong and just as perverted and damaging as them. Thanks for the assistance and making my point.
Good day.
Last edited: