So you think if something is static, not moving, it is not subject to time?
All matter is non-static.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So you think if something is static, not moving, it is not subject to time?
and all energy is non static.....
but time is not energy....or matter
a lack of motion is never a measure of timeAgain, I agree. But to be non-static requires time.
Now that I can agree with. Time is a way of measuring any and all aspects of the universe's continuing existence.
and time is ONLY a measure
as you have noticed
I have posted ...for all the 'time' I've been hereSo not created by man, good that you are man enough to admit it.
No not just a measure but an effect.
I have posted ...for all the 'time' I've been here
time is a cognitive device created by Man to serve Man
I grew up with that perspective
Yes, but you stated without time, there could be no motion: everything would be static, so therefore, according to your belief, time causes the motion, or as I understand it, time is merely a conceptual idea to measure the motion of the universe. How can time, without mass or energy. cause all universal movement?All matter is non-static.
I am pleased we finally have found out we agree.Which is essentially what i said from day 1
So
What's the length of as piece of string in hours, minutes and second's ;-)
Are you claiming time has mass and energy, if so, explain how this is measured?Who says there was no mass or energy? And if any mass, energy, subatomic particles, waves, etc. moved, that's "time".
I don't know what led to the evolution of our universe, but "infinity" does have to be in the running according to what appears to be a majority of cosmologists. Logically, at least as far as we seemingly know, something(s) always had to be here, whether the be energy/particle forms, a god, gods, or whatever?
I am pleased we finally have found out we agree.
The length of a piece of string in hours, minutes, and seconds is directly related to its physical robustness wrt the rate of degradation and decay, so the length of time would vary according to the particular environment it is in.
Come around....huh...I've been saying the same thing from the get go, time is a human concept to measure the enduring nature of existence.I knew you'd come round eventually.
You are not describing the length of a piece of string but its entropy.
try WikiNot my problem how you grew up, time has existed at least since the beginning of this universe.
Or perhaps you can explain how the universe passed from bb to humans existing without time.
Spirit firstWho says there was no mass or energy? And if any mass, energy, subatomic particles, waves, etc. moved, that's "time".
I don't know what led to the evolution of our universe, but "infinity" does have to be in the running according to what appears to be a majority of cosmologists. Logically, at least as far as we seemingly know, something(s) always had to be here, whether the be energy/particle forms, a god, gods, or whatever?
Yes, but you stated without time, there could be no motion: everything would be static, so therefore, according to your belief, time causes the motion, or as I understand it, time is merely a conceptual idea to measure the motion of the universe. How can time, without mass or energy. cause all universal movement?
Are you claiming time has mass and energy, if so, explain how this is measured?
Evidence?Spirit first