This is false. Substance, according to Merriam-Webster:
Definition of SUBSTANCE
1.
a : essential nature :
essence
b : a fundamental or characteristic part or quality
c :
Christian Science :
god
...
If spirit exists, it is by definition of substance. Problem: You haven't shown that it does exist, and it's still up to you to do that before your question can be elevated from silly subjective conjecture to something people might actually form serious thoughts about. Right now it'd be easiest to just ignore it if you didn't keep spamming it everywhere and pestering people about it.
Here's the thing. I actually bothered to answer your question. Then you started arguing about my answers. You are derailing the thread. This thread isn't about your question. If you really ONLY wish to argue about your silly question, then make your own thread. You are literally trying to make this thread about you and your question, and you do it in other threads too. You don't seem to care what the topic is ACTUALLY about. Plus:
I only addressed the fact that you openly misquoted a piece of text without reading said text and made assumptions about it, which you admitted in the very same post.
If you keep quoting me:
A. Stop moving the goal posts.
B. Stop changing the subject.
C. Address all the claims i made if you expect me to address all of yours.
I feel like a parrot for repeating this: You use less effort than others in a debate. MUCH less. You expect people to take you seriously, answer your question when the thread isn't even about it, and not ignore a SINGLE letter of your claims or you yourself start making empty claims about people misquoting you when they've done nothing of the sort. Then you just ignore just about EVERYTHING THROWN AT YOU.
This is an exercise in futility, and you are intentionally wanting people to lower the standard of discussion so you can keep up... But this isn't about you. It's not even about me. So, unless you have something to defend any of your claims with, or answer any of my points, don't bother expecting any more answers. I don't want to derail this thread myself.
I already answered your question twice in this thread. Stop asking it from me again. Or at least explain how my answers are wrong with SOME effort. Seriously. I used rational arguments to form my statements. You just ignore it with "nuh-uh." How fair is that?