Obviously when the brain evolved the ability to differentiate between "I" and "they" it increased the chances of survival for the organism.What is the point to the brain doing this?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Obviously when the brain evolved the ability to differentiate between "I" and "they" it increased the chances of survival for the organism.What is the point to the brain doing this?
"Expand the insight into the question at hand?" Nonsense. You have no insight, all you do is parrot your new-age dogma and patronise other members.
Obviously when the brain evolved the ability to differentiate between "I" and "they" it increased the chances of survival for the organism.
It doesn't surprise me. Some people just make stuff up to sound clever. Others twist and misrepresent things for the purpose of self-promotion.
But you still cannot address the content of anything I post. All you can do is childishly label and denigrate. Show me something real. Until then, anything you've been saying has no substance to it. Just so much hot air.
You make crap up all the time and jump to false conclusions.
I don't follow. I see the ability for organisms to distinguish between "I" and "you" as a natural result of evolution and natural selection. Papers like the one you linked to recently are just a natural result of human brains trying to understand how they themselves work.But what is the use of creating an idea of 'I', when all it need do is see and know that there is a difference? 'I' is more involved than just a brain concoction.
That "I" is more involved than just a brain concoction is itself a brain concoction...'I' is more involved than just a brain concoction.
So, following this train of thought.... since you realize this little nugget, you are therefore an enlightened being and so are in a position to say.Everyone is already enlightened, but most just haven't realized it yet.
"Before Enlightenment, it is Something Special;
after Enlightenment, it is Nothing Special"
Zen Source
But how would you know, Ben d, if you are not already enlightened yourself?I take that as a no......I would urge you to reconsider...what's the point of practicing Buddhism if nirvana is not the goal......no nirvana for the luke warmers...
I don't follow. I see the ability for organisms to distinguish between "I" and "you" as a natural result of evolution and natural selection. Papers like the one you linked to recently are just a natural result of human brains trying to understand how they themselves work.
So, following this train of thought.... since you realize this little nugget, you are therefore an enlightened being and so are in a position to say.
Not at all. You have both managed to set yourselves up, quite nicely, without any help from me. You put yourselves in the position as ones who are knowing, I didn't. So, either you actually know what you are talking about or your are simply making sweeping assumptions. Which is it?So now you're trying to set me and ben up, eh?
The message is usually bogus crap that seems to support your relentless narrative. So, you either know what you are talking about, first hand, or you do not. Put up or shut up.Look. Just read the post and appreciate it for it's message, OK?
Not at all. You have both managed to set yourselves up, quite nicely, without any help from me. You put yourselves in the position as ones who are knowing, I didn't. So, either you actually know what you are talking about or your are simply making sweeping assumptions. Which is it?
The message is usually bogus crap that seems to support your relentless narrative. So, you either know what you are talking about, first hand, or you do not. Put up or shut up.
But how would you know, Ben d, if you are not already enlightened yourself?
You operate on the assumption that your drivel actually has content.No. You read the post, and if you don't understand it, ask. Just stop trying to attack the messenger. Both you and Muldoon have a bad habit of not wanting a discussion and only want to denigrate. When you can come up a level or two and actually address the CONTENT of the post, then we can establish grounds for a discussion. So stop being coy. I am hip to the both of you and your silly trix.
Now to thy room thou must go.
One does not need to be enlightened to make a logical observation....and since you now want to get involved, you answer it....the goal of Buddhism is to realize Nirvana......if you do not want to realize that goal, what is the point of practicing Buddhism?But how would you know, Ben d, if you are not already enlightened yourself?
Maybe....but a mighty one that has looked into the eyes of Vishnu... Isn't the Buddha said to be an incarnation of Vishnu?CAUTION! THIS POST IS BAITED BY A VERY COY MOUSE!
So? Small step from seeing to thinking as brains evolve...But they don't think I and you; they just see I and you.