• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

A Universe From Nothing

Sw. Vandana Jyothi

Truth is One, many are the Names
Premium Member
Swamini, this is no leg-pulling. My grandpa did not even know the name of Quantum, I know. Similarly our future generations will know more things than what we know. I do not know as to how many generations will be required to answer that particular question, one, two or more. I think it would not take 100 generations, that is why I said 'a few'.

Oh, Aup! I'm so sorry I misunderstood. I really did think you were joking. Alas, I think even 300 years ("they" say a generation is 30 years) will not suffice for mankind or its scientists to know the full truth. An individual soul here and there will attain that Supreme Knowledge but certainly not mankind as a whole.
 

Native

Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist
I don't think 'nothing' is a state that exists or existed. Whenever there was anything, their was the universe. if it is finite into the past, so was time. Still no nothing.
Are you saying there was something before the socalled "Big Bang"?
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
Alas, I think even 300 years ("they" say a generation is 30 years) will not suffice for mankind or its scientists to know the full truth. An individual soul here and there will attain that Supreme Knowledge but certainly not mankind as a whole.
Swamini, I am not into making predictions. I am not a prophet. Gabriel did not approach me for any 'divine' mission.
 
Last edited:

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
Are you saying there was something before the socalled "Big Bang"?

No. I make no claim on that. But *if* time existed before the Big Bang, so did matter and energy. If time did NOT exist prior to the Big Bang, then it is meaningless to talk about 'before the Big bang'.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
Where, in the Bible, does it say that God created the heavens and earth from something that existed?

Well, there was already space (without form and void) and a 'deep' with a boundary (which darkness was on the face of).
 

`mud

Just old
Premium Member
One is forgetting the water that was everywhere,
did `He` create the `water` ?
The `water` over which `He` hovered.

Ahhh...Moses...Marvelous !
 

ecco

Veteran Member
In fact, their descriptions really confirms a kind of Steady State Universe, the one model before the strange and highly speculative Big Bang model nonsense.

Confirms! Really? What it confirms is that the ancients did not have equipment advanced enough to detect an expanding universe. What it confirms is that the ancients did not have equipment advanced enough to detect a rotating galaxy. What it confirms is that the ancients did not have equipment advanced enough to differentiate between stars and distant galaxies.

That's no knock on them. It's just a knock on anyone ascribing knowledge to the ancients that they could not have had.




A "childish solution" to this problem of not understanding the ancient ancestors could be that modern humans have forgotten the natural and spiritual insights of nature ON and ABOVE the Earth and take the old knowledge as mumbo jumbo and "mythical hearsayings".

That's not a childish solution. That's just not childishly ascribing knowledge to the ancients that they could not have had.
 

ecco

Veteran Member
Well, there was already space (without form and void) and a 'deep' with a boundary (which darkness was on the face of).

First verse KJV...
1In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

Second verse...
2And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

There is nothing in there that says that anything (other than God) preceded His creation of the heaven and the earth. There is nothing in there that says from what God created the heaven and the earth. There is nothing in there that implies that God needed anything in order to create the heaven and the earth.
 

A Vestigial Mote

Well-Known Member
In the end, no one needs an explanation for "how the universe began" in order to go about the business of living their lives. Hence the reason that proposing that you do know before you actually have any real evidence to back you up (regardless what your particular "creation mythology" is) is mostly useless and is, pardon the expression, dumb. You don't know. That's the honest answer. Anything else is the opposite of that. As in... dishonest.
 

halbhh

The wonder and awe of "all things".
....magical....

This may not be the best characterization to make, when an always existing cosmos viewpoint is using....well...frankly just another variety of belief, until far more than merely another unsupported theory among dozens of competing theories is behind it....

Perhaps a less prejudicial term for such a belief taken as how things are...is to call it a 'faith'. (simply another variety of many)
 
Last edited:

Clear

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Hi,

I don’t really want to enter this conversation other than to mention a historical point. The theory of creation from nothing is a theory than was developed and adopted in the later Judeo-christian movements, but the earliest Judeo-christian movements understood that the material universe was created from pre-existing matter. The historians and restorationist movements still retain the earlier doctrine where the universe was made from matter.


1) THE DOCTRINE OF CREATION FROM MATTER WAS TAUGHT ANCIENTLY

Many ancients and early Christians UNDERSTOOD a creation out of pre-existing matter, and not ex-nihilo.
Justin Martyr, in his First Apology, says : “We have been taught that He in the beginning did of his goodness, for man's sake, create all things out of unformed matter” (ex amorphou hyles). First Apology, 49.


Philo mentions : "This cosmos of ours was formed out of all that there is of water, and air and fire, not even the smallest particle being left outside" (De Plantatione 2.6). Further, "when the substance of the universe was without shape and figure God gave it these; when it had no definite character God molded it into definiteness. . ." (De Somniis 2.6.45).


Justin Martyr, in discussing this preexistent primal matter (hyle), assures us, "we have learned" from our revelations was in the tradition of Clement (c. A.D. 96) who had praised God who "has made manifest (ephaneropoiesas) the everlasting fabric (aenaon sustasin) of the world."



Athenagoras, (despite his stress on the transcendence of God), explains concerning the preexistent Son: "He came forth to be the energizing power of things, which lay like a nature without attributes, and an inactive earth, the grosser particles being mixed up with the lighter."


The physical creation of ancient accounts was accomplished by taking “lessor” or more chaotic matter, and organizing it into a “higher” or more organized and purposeful form such as the organized earth had. Old Testament Enoch describes this process: “And I called out a second time into the very lowest things, and I said, ‘Let one of the (in)visible things come out visibly, solid.’..” (2nd Enoch 26:1). From chaotic debris, the earth and other planets were formed : Quote: “And thus I made solid the heavenly circles (orbs). ...And from the rocks I assembled the dry land; and I called the dry land Earth. “ (2nd Enoch 28:1-2).

Creation from matter is implicit throughout Greco-Roman literature of the time of Christianity's inception, and there is no indication in the Christian writings that they held a different view. On the contrary, the famous late nineteenth-century study by Edwin Hatch on the inroads of Greek philosophy into early Christianity describes the tacit but widespread assumption of the coexistence of matter with God.



2) EARLY JUDAO-CHRISTIAN WRITINGS

In the Secrets of Enoch, 25.1-3, God says, "I commanded . . . that visible things should come from the unseen . . . ."


Dodd, in “The Bible and the Greeks”, p. 111 explained that to the ancients, such creation meant organization of the elements, as the Codex Brucianus "Creation is organization" (Manuscript No 96) and it explains that first, there is matter. And what is done with the matter it that it is organized into things created. Cosmos MEANS order.

The early Jewish Apocalypes of Abraham hails God as the one who brings order out of confusion, ever preparing and renewing worlds for the righteous. For example, the Jewish Mishna relates that God created many, many worlds (almost a thousand) before this one and usewd the debris from this sort of pre-existing matter to create this world

The Berlin (Mandaean) Papyrus says " At the same time, the great thought came to the elements in united wisdom, spirit joining with matter." Matter can be imbued with spirit, but it will always be undergoing change and processing.

Pistis Sophia says "I (christ) called upon Gabriel from the midst of the worlds (aeons) along with Michael, pursuant to the command of my Father...and I gave to them the task of outpouring of the light and caused them to go down into matter unorganized (chaos) and assist Pistis Sophis"



Even 2 Maccabees, which is often used to SUPPORT ex nihilo, has Syriac recensions as well as some Greek manuscripts describing an organization of [chaotic] matter, which is also the explicit position of Wisdom of Solomon 11:17 where we read of God's hand which "created the world out of unformed matter (ktisasa ton kosmon ex amorphou hyles)," Even the "non-existent" cited in 2 Maccabees 7:28 is not absolute nothing, but rather is . . . the metaphysical substance . . . in an uncrystallized state." This relative "nonbeing" referred to a chaotic, shadowy state of matter before the world was made; as we might say in biblical terms, "without form and void."

The Early writings are full of references regarding how chaotic matter is used. The ancients understood that "At a new creation there is a reshuffling of elements " This particular 'restating' of the 'conservation of mass' is from Ben Sirach. But the principle is also found in the Odes of Solomon; it's in the Ginza; it's in the Mandaean Johannesbuch; it's in Berlin Manichaean; it's in the Pistis Sophia, and it's in the oldest and most impressive Coptic writings.

The point here is simply that the creation of the material worlds from matter was the default teaching of early christianity and the ancients were NOT unaware of matter and how it was used in creation from chaotic matter (rather than the later doctrine of creation from "nothing"). It was later Juedo-christiaity which created and then adopted creation from "nothing".

Clear
φιφυσιω
 

Rational Agnostic

Well-Known Member
This may not be the best characterization to make, when an always existing cosmos viewpoint is using....well...frankly just another variety of belief, until far more than merely another unsupported theory among dozens of competing theories is behind it....

Perhaps a less prejudicial term for such a belief taken as how things are...is to call it a 'faith'. (simply another variety of many)

An all-powerful superman (ok, call it "God" if you must) creating a universe out of thin air? Sounds magical to me.
 

gnostic

The Lost One
In fact, their descriptions really confirms a kind of Steady State Universe, the one model before the strange and highly speculative Big Bang model nonsense.

I don’t think you have any idea what the debunked Steady State model is.

There are two core things that the Steady State advocates agreed with the Big Bang theory:

  1. Solutions can be obtained through General Relativity, such as from Einstein’s field equations.
  2. And by using the field equations, both sides (SS & BB) agreed that the universe have been expanding and still is expanding.
The main differences are that SS think the universe is eternal -
  1. no new stars formations, no stars ending their life cycle (eg no supernovas, no evolving to red giants/white dwarfs, no neutron stars), etc, meaning the stars are eternal;
  2. ...which in term, meaning galaxies are also eternal.
The universe is eternally expanding and galaxies have always existed.

The BB model on the other hand, proposed that there were no matters as we know it at infinitely hot & dense but finite beginning (eg 13.7 billion years ago), starting with the Planck Epoch. And it was so hot and dense, that normal elementary particles and normal matters cannot form.

But with rapid exponential expansion at the beginning, the universe rapidly cooled down, and the Big Bang model included a number of epochs and eras that each played roles in the evolution of the universe that include the following:
  1. The separation of fundamental interactions or forces (gravitational, strong nuclear, weak nuclear & electromagnetic interactions), at successive early epochs.
  2. Astrophysicists explained that continuing expansion and cooling of the universe, in successive epochs, led to formations of elementary particles, for instances, quarks forming from quark-gluon plasma during the Quark Epoch, electrons and neutrinos formed during the Lepton Epoch, etc.
  3. About 10^-6 seconds after the Big Bang, hadron particles (eg protons and neutrons) began forming...BUT they didn’t form into atoms, until the Big Bang Nucleosynthesis or BBN (Epoch that started when the universe was 10 seconds old, and lasting for 20 minutes), when nuclei formed lighter elements, hydrogen nuclei, helium nuclei and lithium nuclei, but no electrons were bonded to these nuclei yet, so these atoms existed as ionized elements (oxygen, carbon, nitrogen didn’t exist yet).
  4. Bonding of electrons to ionized elements, until 377,000 years after the Big Bang, known as Recombination Epoch, and for the first time, there were electrical-neutral and stable atoms. The Recombination Epoch is landmark Epoch, because for the first time, the universe was transparent, and the bonding of electrons to nuclei, decouple photons, and light could travel freely in space. We have detected these radiation, which you might possibly know it as, Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) and seen recent images of CMBR from the WMAP mission and the Planck mission. (Both BBN & CMBR were predicted by BB astrophysicists in 1948, and were first evidence discovered in 1964). The CMBR discovery in 1964, was what debunked Steady State model.
  5. Large molecular clouds formed the earliest large structures in the universe. And many of these molecular clouds reached critical mass that caused them to gravitational collapses, that trigger nuclear fusion (Stellar Nucleosynthesis) and ignited the earliest generation of stars. The earliest star formation started about 100 million years after the Big Bang.

The first generation of stars were very massive stars, so they had much shorter lifespan than 2 successive generations of stars, so many of them exploded as “pair-instability” type supernovas. It is these types of supernovas that introduced heavier elements into universe, heavier than helium and lithium (eg oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, nickel, iron, etc, through Supernova Nucleosynthesis).

Our sun is a young star, at least 3rd generation.

My points in all this, that matters weren’t eternal, and the Big Bang theory proposed universe that have been continuing changing, evolving. New stars would form, while older stars would eventually die out. Nothing last forever.

Our yellow dwarf star would eventually run out of hydrogen nuclei to fuse into helium atoms, but it won’t go supernova; the sun will eventually turn into red giant star, swallowing up Mercury and Venus, while burning away out fragile atmosphere, and that will kill off all life on Earth. Then outer layers of red sun will be break-away, until all that it is left is the Sun’s core - and the sun has become white dwarf star. It will be another 5 billion years before it turn into red giant sun.
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
Theists often make the claim that atheists believe in a universe that came into existence out of nothing. I find this very strange, because I (though I don't speak for all atheists) don't believe this. I don't know where the universe came from, if it had a cause, and if so, what its cause was. But I don't believe it came from "nothing." ................................

You are Not alone in finding 'a universe out of nothing to be very strange' because that is Not what the Bible teaches.
According to Scripture, God made the universe out of His great power, His great strength - Please notice Isaiah 40:26; Jeremiah 10:12; 27:5; 32:17
In other words, God supplied the abundantly needed high-density dynamic energy to create the material realm of existence. - Psalms 104:30
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
... There is nothing in there that implies that God needed anything in order to create the heaven and the earth.

I suppose one could say that God didn't need anything to create because 'God Almighty already had' Great Power, Great Strength - Isaiah 40:26
God did Not need what He already possessed to create both the invisible realm and then the material/physical realm of existence - Psalms 104:30
In a figurative sense, 'God's hands' were used in creation - Isaiah 45:12
 
Top