If you consider God real and alive, then the existence of God is an example of abiogenesis. Believers frequently tell us that life always comes from previous life, but as you can see, that is incorrect even if you believe in God whether you call God living or not.
OK. Your worldview might not be too different from mine, and I'm an atheist. I don't use the word God. If you saw my exchange with SalixIncendium, you saw an example of the ambiguity that ensues in Western culture when the word God is used to mean something other than a kind of person that you can talk to and who does things.
I'm starting to get the sense that most non-Abrahamics, especially the polytheists, are theistic humanists, which is only distinguished from atheistic humanism by the use of the word God or gods to describe nature. There are also Abrahamic theists who fit into this category, but they are the minority of the Christians, and none of the Baha'i. At the risk of offending these Christians, I would say that they don't believe in their god any differently than you believe in yours. If they pray, don't expect answers. I was only able to tell that they consider themselves Christian because they entered that as their religion back when RF had a place to do that, but otherwise, they write nothing that I wouldn't agree with, they respect and rely on reason and conscience (none are homophobes, atheophobes, or misogynists due to scripture as best I can tell), they respect education and science, so they fit the definition of humanist despite saying they have a God-belief.
And to the Christians who fit that description reading here, if you came from the kind of Christianity I did, which was a charismatic form of fundamental Protestantism, my apologies. I would have been chastised in my congregation if I came back and told them that somebody said that about me, that there was no evidence of Christianity visible in me until I told them, and I probably would have been horrified.
