rojse
RF Addict
Except it has the same issue with it: abortion can be a major procedure; just as it's considered unreasonable to demand that a woman carry her fetus to term, I think it's unreasonable to demand that she not do so.
Plus, I think that in practical application, if a law like that were actually put in place, it would end up just being a means for deadbeat fathers to have a legal excuse for their deadbeat-ness.
I don't think I was quite as clear as I wanted to be.
In the situation where a man does not want the child and the woman does, removing parental rights and responsibilities of the male seems to solve both problems in the most reasonable way possible. The male has his financial and parental obligations removed, and his rights in the process, and the female gets to have the child.
Yes, it does give a legal excuse for deadbeat fathers to be deadbeats, but the current situation, of being saddled with the social and fiscal responsibilities of parenthood when they do not want it, I don't see as being overly fair either.
Last edited: