• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Adam and his wife died physically after eating the Forbidden Fruit. Genesis 2:17 is Literal.

McBell

Unbound
Adam and his wife died *physically* after partaking of the Forbidden Fruit. Moreover, it was on that very day...

Genesis 2:17
"But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die."

  • Day means Day, as in twenty-four hours or less.
  • Surely Die means Surely Die, as in physical death.
As far as I know, I am the only person on the planet that believes the above verse.

Both Christians and Non-Christians alike will take away and add words to the verse to make it state something it does not.

Some examples include...
  • Spiritual Death: Adam and his wife 'died Spiritually'.
  • Begin to Age: The 'aging process' for Adam and his wife 'began ticking'.
  • Day is a Thousand Years: Adam and his wife 'died within a thousand-year timeframe'.
Note that taking away and adding to the Word of God is of course a very big no-no, yet everyone does it with Genesis 2:17.

There is no need however, to alter the verse. Genesis 2:17 agrees with the entire Bible when taken literally.

In fact, it is the *only* way in which it does! :)
So then Cain and Abel were born in the Garden of Eden?
 

Yokefellow

Active Member
So then Cain and Abel were born in the Garden of Eden?

Hi @McBell

Cain and Abel were born after the Fall, in other words they were born after the Second Adam, along with his newly created wife Eve, were expelled from their previous estate.

On a related note, Cain was the first reincarnation of Satan into a Human form. Satan was turned into Male Seed in this verse...

Genesis 3:14
"And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life"


Milk of the Word: Satan was turned into a scary snake. <- Taught to Children
Meat of the Word: Satan was turned into what we now call Sperm. <- Taught to Adults

Most Christians are still on the Milk. They are never taught the Adult Education version of Scripture.

For example, 'Dust' is symbolic of Seed and what Life is made of. In other words, DNA...

Genesis 28:14
"And thy seed shall be as the dust of the earth, and thou shalt spread abroad to the west, and to the east, and to the north, and to the south: and in thee and in thy seed shall all the families of the earth be blessed."


After God turned Satan into Male Seed, he was placed into the loins of Mankind. Thus, every Male on the planet has the so called 'Seed of the Serpent'.

When the Second Adam planted his Seed into the fertile Earth of Eve's womb, the result was Cain, i.e., 'Thorns and Thistles'...

Genesis 3:18
"Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field"


The above verse is a euphemism for bearing Children. God cursed the ground...

Genesis 3:17
"And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life"


The phrase 'cursed is the ground' has more than one meaning. It can refer to the 'Lowest Parts of the Earth' where you and I came from...

Psalms 139:15
"My substance was not hid from thee, when I was made in secret, and curiously wrought in the lowest parts of the earth."


The 'Earthen Vessels' of Man has been corrupted.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
@F1fan

Nothing you have stated addresses Genesis 2:17.
I’m addressing you, the member making claims about what the text means. Your interpretation is not consistent with facts and what we understand as reality. You failed to rebut anything.
You are derailing. I consider that to be rude.
This is an open debate forum. If you post outside of the protected areas then it is fair game.
 

Yokefellow

Active Member
"second" Adam?

:)

If we take Genesis 2:17 literally, in other words if we conclude that the couple actually died, this presents a very big and obvious problem.

How did we get here if the original Man and Woman are now dead? Dead people cannot make babies.

Several theories are available to solve the issue. I will present the one that I believe agrees best with Scripture.

We begin with the creation of the first Woman. Her name was 'Ishshah'... yes, Ishshah, not Eve...

Genesis 2:23
"And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man."


The First Adam named his wife 'Woman' or 'Ishshah' in the original Hebrew. Nowhere does the name 'Eve' show up until much later, after the Fall.

Therefore, it was the First Adam along with his wife Ishshah that died after partaking of the Forbidden Fruit.

God then recreated... i.e., reincarnated them as the Second Adam and Eve on the Sixth Day. That is when the Second Adam gave this new creation the name Eve...

Genesis 3:20
"And Adam called his wife’s name Eve; because she was the mother of all living."


Note that whenever God creates a new Living Being, Adam names it...

Genesis 2:19
"And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof."


Adam did not give two names to the same person.

If we read the rest of the Creation Account, we discover that the First Adam was created on the Third Day as the first form of Life, before any plants or animals were created.

On a similar note, Jesus rose on the Third Day as a shoutout to when the First Adam rose. Jesus is even called the 'Last Adam'...

1 Corinthians 15:45
"And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit."


Jesus is the First and the Last.
 

The Hammer

Skald
Premium Member
Again, the topic is whether Genesis 2:17 has been interpreted incorrectly by the Church.

Yup, and the church doesn't take the Bible as literal. Outside of some sects, and that is the wrong approach to interpreting genesis.

It's a creation myth not a creation fact. So there was no literal Adam and literal eve to physically die. So whether the translation is correct or not doesn't matter.

No translation is 1 to 1 and many meanings shift and change with translation. We cannot know the original intents of any of the original writers.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
Adam and his wife died *physically* after partaking of the Forbidden Fruit. Moreover, it was on that very day...

Genesis 2:17
"But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die."

  • Day means Day, as in twenty-four hours or less.
  • Surely Die means Surely Die, as in physical death.
As far as I know, I am the only person on the planet that believes the above verse.

Both Christians and Non-Christians alike will take away and add words to the verse to make it state something it does not.

Some examples include...
  • Spiritual Death: Adam and his wife 'died Spiritually'.
  • Begin to Age: The 'aging process' for Adam and his wife 'began ticking'.
  • Day is a Thousand Years: Adam and his wife 'died within a thousand-year timeframe'.
Note that taking away and adding to the Word of God is of course a very big no-no, yet everyone does it with Genesis 2:17.

There is no need however, to alter the verse. Genesis 2:17 agrees with the entire Bible when taken literally.

In fact, it is the *only* way in which it does! :)
And literally untrue.

What else is new.
 

Sgt. Pepper

All you need is love.
Yup, and the church doesn't take the Bible as literal. Outside of some sects, and that is the wrong approach to interpreting genesis.

It's a creation myth not a creation fact. So there was no literal Adam and literal eve to physically die. So whether the translation is correct or not doesn't matter.

No translation is 1 to 1 and many meanings shift and change with translation. We cannot know the original intents of any of the original writers.

I see no reason to give the OP's translation of Genesis 2:17 any more credence than other Christian translations. The fact is that they can't agree on how to interpret the Bible, but most of them have no problem claiming that their preferred translation is correct and other Christian translations are wrong.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
It may be best to deal with this thread by merely refuting the title. "Genesis 2:17 is literal".

No it is not. Genesis itself cannot be literal if God is not a liar.
 

Yokefellow

Active Member
So far, not a single person has even come close to debunking the OP. Seems no one here has the ability to interpret Scripture literally, yet I am able to do it with ease and with no contradictions. Talk about Winning. :cool: I award myself one brownie point.

While we wait for someone intelligent enough to be able to demonstrate, through Bible verses, why Genesis 2:17 is not literal, I will add some more to the OP.

Genesis 2:7 is a good place to start. The word 'day' is often changed to something non-literal like 'back in the day' or something along the lines of 'all six days of Creation'...

Genesis 2:4
"These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens"


This presents many problems that Christians have yet to resolve.

If we do however, take 'day' literally, something amazing happens. We discover that there was an 'Adam' created on the Third Day...

Genesis 1:10
"And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good."


In the above verse, we see that Earth was finished on Day Three. The Heavens were finished as well. Therefore, Genesis 2:4 is giving us a timeline of events beginning on the Third Day.

We know this is True because we have confirmation here...

Genesis 2:5 (New Living Translation)
"Neither wild plants nor grains were growing on the earth. For the LORD God had not yet sent rain to water the earth, and there were no people to cultivate the soil."


Perfect. We are at the moment when no plants (or any Life for that matter) existed. So, what is the first form of Life to be created?

Genesis 2:7
"And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul."


And there we have it. Man was originally created on the Third Day, not the Sixth as the Lying Church teaches.
 
Last edited:

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
So far, not a single person has even come close to debunking the OP. Seems no one here has the ability to interpret Scripture literally, yet I am able to do it with ease and with no contradictions. Talk about Winning. :cool: I award myself one brownie point.

While we wait for someone intelligent enough to be able to demonstrate, through Bible verses, why Genesis 2:17 is not literal, I will add some more to the OP.

Genesis 2:7 is a good place to start. The word 'day' is often changed to something non-literal like 'back in the day' or something along the lines of 'all six days of Creation'...

Genesis 2:4
"These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens"


This presents many problems that Christians have yet to resolve.

If we do however, take 'day' literally, something amazing happens. We discover that there was an 'Adam' created on the Third Day...

Genesis 1:10
"And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good."


In the above verse, we see that Earth was finished on Day Three. The Heavens were finished as well. Therefore, Genesis 2:4 is giving us a timeline of events beginning on the Third Day.

We know this is True because we have confirmation here...

Genesis 2:5 (New Living Translation)
"Neither wild plants nor grains were growing on the earth. For the LORD God had not yet sent rain to water the earth, and there were no people to cultivate the soil."


Perfect. We are at the moment when no plants (or any Life for that matter) existed. So, what is the first form of Life to be created?

Genesis 2:7
"And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul."


And there we have it. Man was originally created on the Third Day, not the Sixth as the Lying Church teaches.
Why would you want to read Genesis literally?
 

Yokefellow

Active Member
The Church has yet to resolve another problem...

Many Christians believe that the Tree of Life is something that must be partaken of continually to 'keep from aging'. They claim that Genesis 2:17 describes Death as 'beginning to age' because the couple no longer had access.

Are we to understand that Adam and Eve were supposed to have sex in front of the Tree of Life and make babies?

Note that the Tree of Life is in the New Jerusalem. Scripture teaches us that there is no Marriage, thus no bearing of Children in the New Heavens and New Earth. No reproductive organs either.

Is this not a glaring contradiction?

Imagine all of those babies that never age because they partook of the Tree of Life. How can the Earth be filled except with more babies?

Now the Earth is filled with trillions of babies that never age with Adam and Eve taking care of them for infinity.

So many problems arise when Genesis 2:17 is not taken literally.
 

AdamjEdgar

Active Member
Adam and his wife died *physically* after partaking of the Forbidden Fruit. Moreover, it was on that very day...

Genesis 2:17
"But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die."

  • Day means Day, as in twenty-four hours or less.
  • Surely Die means Surely Die, as in physical death.
As far as I know, I am the only person on the planet that believes the above verse.

Both Christians and Non-Christians alike will take away and add words to the verse to make it state something it does not.

Some examples include...
  • Spiritual Death: Adam and his wife 'died Spiritually'.
  • Begin to Age: The 'aging process' for Adam and his wife 'began ticking'.
  • Day is a Thousand Years: Adam and his wife 'died within a thousand-year timeframe'.
Note that taking away and adding to the Word of God is of course a very big no-no, yet everyone does it with Genesis 2:17.

There is no need however, to alter the verse. Genesis 2:17 agrees with the entire Bible when taken literally.

In fact, it is the *only* way in which it does!

Hi @McBell

Cain and Abel were born after the Fall, in other words they were born after the Second Adam, along with his newly created wife Eve, were expelled from their previous estate.

On a related note, Cain was the first reincarnation of Satan into a Human form. Satan was turned into Male Seed in this verse...

Genesis 3:14
"And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life"


Milk of the Word: Satan was turned into a scary snake. <- Taught to Children
Meat of the Word: Satan was turned into what we now call Sperm. <- Taught to Adults

Most Christians are still on the Milk. They are never taught the Adult Education version of Scripture.

For example, 'Dust' is symbolic of Seed and what Life is made of. In other words, DNA...

Genesis 28:14
"And thy seed shall be as the dust of the earth, and thou shalt spread abroad to the west, and to the east, and to the north, and to the south: and in thee and in thy seed shall all the families of the earth be blessed."


After God turned Satan into Male Seed, he was placed into the loins of Mankind. Thus, every Male on the planet has the so called 'Seed of the Serpent'.

When the Second Adam planted his Seed into the fertile Earth of Eve's womb, the result was Cain, i.e., 'Thorns and Thistles'...

Genesis 3:18
"Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field"


The above verse is a euphemism for bearing Children. God cursed the ground...

Genesis 3:17
"And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life"


The phrase 'cursed is the ground' has more than one meaning. It can refer to the 'Lowest Parts of the Earth' where you and I came from...

Psalms 139:15
"My substance was not hid from thee, when I was made in secret, and curiously wrought in the lowest parts of the earth."


The 'Earthen Vessels' of Man has been corrupted.

Genesis 2:23
"And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man."


The First Adam named his wife 'Woman' or 'Ishshah' in the original Hebrew. Nowhere does the name 'Eve' show up until much later, after the Fall.

Therefore, it was the First Adam along with his wife Ishshah that died after partaking of the Forbidden Fruit.

God then recreated... i.e., reincarnated them as the Second Adam and Eve on the Sixth Day. That is when the Second Adam gave this new creation the name Eve...

Genesis 3:20
"And Adam called his wife’s name Eve; because she was the mother of all living."
Hi Yokefellow...

you make some very interesting statements in your posts some of which i have referenced above.

I am a Seventh Day Adventist and we are one of the few religious denominations who do take a literal view of both the Genesis and flood accounts and we believe they are critical to the story of salvation.

I had not thought of the idea of a day being a thousand years as justification for the idea that "in the day thou eastest of it, thou shalt surely die"...its a very interesting thought and to be honest, it could be a good answer to this dilemma.

My view has been that the bible talks extensively about Gods patience and it also talks extensively about sins of fathers being passed onto future generations...so when God said to Adam, "you", he could also be refering to future generations being subject to death instead of immortality.

There is also the notion that death did not exist in the garden prior to the fall and im certain that was what God was actually referring to. We view death as an absolute, however, in those days it did not exist...so what God was saying is, "Adam if you eat of this fruit, you will no longer live forever, your life will end one day in death and that process will start immediately in the day that you eat of the fruit." In that day death will become part of your existence

This is also a concept which proves TEism absolutely wrong to btw...as they must believe that physical death was not a consequence of sin in order to overcome the dilemma of natural selection and death cycle for millions of years up to the point of Adam and Eves sin. The huge theological problem with the claim that sin did not also bring physical death into this world for the first time in the Garden of Eden is Christ incarnation and death on the cross. Christ died physically for the wages of sin...if death was only spiritual, why did Christ die physically and the blood of sheeps and goats be shed as an illustration of this for thousands of years prior to Christ? Finally, why is the second coming also a physical event?

Interestingly enough, one of the first things that Adam and Eve noticed after they ate the fruit is that they were naked. The glory of God that enveloped them had departed...they had separated themselves from their source of eternal life...they immediately began to die and they saw themselves as being naked. What is really interesting is that they turned to leaves of trees in order to cover their nakedness...thus even nature itself became corrupted by their sin as it was used in an attempt to hide their sin...to cover it up. I think this is also why God cursed the ground...to show sin cannot be hidden and its consequences are absolute.

Can i just take particular note of one claim you have made regarding the second Adam and Eve being his second replacement wife after the fall... this is 100% false and unbiblical...Adam was not resurrected into a new person, nor did he get a new wife. Eve is the very same person who was made out of him on the 6th day. God banished both Adam and Eve from the garden because of their sin...this is a fundamental of the bible and no scholars I am aware of see it any differently. It is also an extremely important doctrine...Christ made atonement on the cross as a descendant of Eve. Recall the promise that God made to them in Genesis 3?

14So the LORD God said to the serpent:

“Because you have done this,

cursed are you above all livestock

and every beast of the field!

On your belly will you go,

and dust you will eat,

all the days of your life.

15And I will put enmity between you and the woman,

and between your seed and her seed.

He will crush your head,

and you will strike his heel.
c

Genesis 3:15 is specifically talking about the incarnation of the Messiah...Christ, who would come to save Gods creation.

Also, the bible specifically tells us who the second Adam is...is specifically calls Christ the second Adam (i would suggest you read Romans Chapter 5 and 6 (and note 5:18&19)

18 Consequently, just as the result of one trespass was condemnation for all men, so also the result of one act of righteousness was justification that brings life for all men. 19 For just as through the disobedience of the one man the many were made sinners, so also through the obedience of the one man the many will be made righteous.


When developing bible doctrine, it is vitally important that you cross reference your ideas from a wide range of texts...but not only that, you need to ensure that your theology remains consistent with other bible statements that are self interpreting. The topic of Christ being the second Adam is a crucial doctrine and for a crucial reason, Christ came to undo the mistake that his predecessor if you like, the first Adam, made. This is a key salvation doctrine and is directly linked with the dual nature of Christ (ie God/man). Only one man was capable of making atonement for sin...the entire sanctuary service of Moses explains to us that a lamb "without fault" was the only sacrifice acceptable to God as atonement for sin. A perfect sinless man must take the place of Adam to make atonement for his sin...and this person was Christ.

Finally, your claim regarding Genesis 2:7 and "God formed man out of the dust of the ground" being a reference for mans creation on day three is complete nonesense...that text in no way references anything of the sort. You are simply not udnerstanding that the bible writers regularly "recap" and that is exactly what is happening in here.

Moses is recapping Adam being made "out of the dust of the ground" in describing what happens when one dies. Remember death did not exist prior to this time...God was explaining to Adam and Eve that when they die, their bodies would begin to break down..."rot" if you want to use a very blunt word. Adam and Eve now understood what happens when they die. They had no idea what the process was prior to this time...if you had never faced death, and knew nothing of it, wouldnt you ask the same question...what happens to me when i die? (those who believe that when we die we go straight to purgatory or heaven might want to think about this btw)
 
Last edited:
Top