Almost Everything You Think You Know Is A Lie

[Subduction Zone]

That is not logical reasoning. That's swept under the rug type reasoning. Out of sight out of mind .

Projection again. You were talking about brightness and what you see. I explained why the Earth is not that much "brighter". Once again, you need to know the difference between which sense are roughly logarithmic and which ones are linear:

Weber–Fechner law - Wikipedia

 

[Subduction Zone]

I said you cannot percieve a 70 foot drop over a mile. You can't . It's the same as your example about the Earth being 3 times brighter than the moon except we can't percieve it.

Sorry, I misunderstood that. It was a poor analogy. You are still comparing a logarithmic sense to a linear one.

 

[Orias]

If you're looking down a road for a mile that has a 70 foot drop you will not be able to see it .

The Earth is 3x brighter than the moon but you won't see it.

With that said, neither you or I will ever see the Earth in it's entirety. We can't percieve it .

 

[Orias]

Projection again. You were talking about brightness and what you see. I explained why the Earth is not that much "brighter". Once again, you need to know the difference between which sense are roughly logarithmic and which ones are linear:

Weber–Fechner law - Wikipedia

No, you said the Earth isn't brighter. Then you changed you're argument once you realized you misread

 

[Subduction Zone]

"Linear event" lol. Doesn't matter if you're looking up or down you line of sight is pretty linear isn't it?

Once again, the subject was brightness, a logarithmic sense. I have notice that you use phrases like "keep up" and yet you can't "keep up" yourself. Have others accused you of this and did you decide to use it in debates because you thought it worked?

 

[Subduction Zone]

No, you said the Earth isn't brighter. Then you changed you're argument once you realized you misread

Wrong again, quote me saying that, make sure it is in context.

 

[Orias]

Once again, the subject was brightness, a logarithmic sense. I have notice that you use phrases like "keep up" and yet you can't "keep up" yourself. Have others accused you of this and did you decide to use it in debates because you thought it worked?

What are you talking about "keep up"? That's not even in any of my comments or quotes....

 

[Orias]

The Earth is not much brighter than the Moon. Why would you say such a thing?.

Here.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Also the "70 foot drop over a mile" is a rather bad example. Walking I might not notice. On a bicycle I would notice it. On a rive you could not miss it.

 

[Subduction Zone]

What are you talking about "keep up"? That's not even in any of my comments or quotes....

Something on that order was in your earlier repertoire. At any rate why are you still running?

 

[Orias]

It's 3x brighter. It's not "much" brighte

Also the "70 foot drop over a mile" is a rather bad example. Walking I might not notice. On a bicycle I would notice it. On a rive you could not miss it.

No, you wouldn't on any of these examples .

 

[Orias]

Something on that order was in your earlier repertoire. At any rate why are you still running?

No, I never said anything like that .

 

[Orias]

You still haven't answered this question, and I can't believe I'm asking it for like the 4th or 5th time.

How did the astronauts endure lethal space radiation which the van Allen belts protect us from?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Here.

So you admit that you are wrong. Because I only said that the Earth is "Not much brighter" and it is not. From context it is obvious that I was admitting that it was brighter, just not much.

 

[Subduction Zone]

No, I never said anything like that .

Maybe it was and maybe it wasn't. Why are you still running?

 

[Subduction Zone]

You still haven't answered this question, and I can't believe I'm asking it for like the 4th or 5th time.

How did the astronauts endure lethal space radiation which the van Allen belts protect us from?

I already told you I would answer that after you stop running:

 

[Orias]

So you admit that you are wrong. Because I only said that the Earth is "Not much brighter" and it is not. From context it is obvious that I was admitting that it was brighter, just not much.

No, I quoted you saying the Earth isn't much brighter than the Earth, when in fact it's 3x brighter.

 

[Orias]

I already told you I would answer that after you stop running:

You won't answer because you can't .Back to square one with you. Somehow me asking questions to bring clarity is running. You're the opposite of rational.

 

[Orias]

Don't you find it weird there isn't any movies of landing on the moon?

With the technology now you'd think they'd be able to make a movie that accurately represents what it's like...wonder why there isn't any movie like that?

 

[Orias]

Also in your video I don't see the sun. I don't see the sun in any videos of the moon. Care to explain that. Or why you footage has clear indication of composite imagery?