ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
No. It was based on one Facebook post from someone who was saying that somebody else was told it happened by a third person.That was based on what some witnesses were saying.
There have been no actual cases of it happening.
Do you think blurting out rumours as facts, despite all evidence to the contrary and there being absolutely zero credible reports, is a perfectly reasonable and sensible thing for someone who wants to be the most powerful person in the world to do in the middle of a presidential debate to millions of people?I saw one individual saying on another channel that he saw a group of them grabbing ducks or geese or something. You don't know for sure what they were doing. Maybe the witness was lying, but maybe not.
The other question is, why say it at all? Why pick that specific non-fact about that specific group, exactly?