• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Another irrefutable proof that God created all things using mathematical induction. And a proof that The Bible is the word of God.

F

F1fan

Veteran Member
Subduction Zone said:
No, they learned their lesson from that eventually. Too bad that you can't

All that you need to do is to learn the basics of science and a whole new world will open up for you. You can still be a Christian. You do not have to excuse the evil acts of God because they did not happen which would mean that God is not evil.

It is rather strange that you would rather believe that God is evil and incompetent rather than to accept reality and treat Genesis and Exodus like the morality tales that they are.
Click to expand...
That's what I stated a few days ago. This literalist interpretation of Genesis means that God is responsible for childhood cancers, not nature and evolution. So then what explanation do they have for why God is a serial killer? None. But it has to be a nagging itch that they can't scratch.
 
F

F1fan

Veteran Member
SavedByTheLord said:
Well evolution is not rational belief.
Click to expand...
Not to those indoctrinated in irrational religious belief as you reveal in your religious beliefs. But to all educated people in the world the science is accepted due to the massive amount of evidence, and expertise showing the work.

Only some fundamentalist Christians believe in your interpretation of the Bible. That is a fringe set of dogmatists. It's notable how creationists have been manipulated with fraud. You are manipulated because you refuse to recognize the fraud.
 
SavedByTheLord

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
F1fan said:
Not to those indoctrinated in irrational religious belief as you reveal in your religious beliefs. But to all educated people in the world the science is accepted due to the massive amount of evidence, and expertise showing the work.

Only some fundamentalist Christians believe in your interpretation of the Bible. That is a fringe set of dogmatists. It's notable how creationists have been manipulated with fraud. You are manipulated because you refuse to recognize the fraud.
Click to expand...
Yes, evolution and billions of years are a fraud and many have been indoctrinated by false education. The same holds true for much of Christianity.

I just believe what the Bible says and not the dogmatists of evolution.
 
Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
SavedByTheLord said:
Yes, evolution and billions of years are a fraud and many have been indoctrinated by false education. The same holds true for much of Christianity.

I just believe what the Bible says and not the dogmatists of evolution.
Click to expand...
And yet you demonstrate that is not true by running away from discussions on just the basics of science. That doe3s not seem to be the act of a person that truly believes what he claims to believe.
 
Mock Turtle

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
SavedByTheLord said:
I already proved the Bible to be true and evolution a lie.
Click to expand...
You apparently have proved it to yourself but you might just have a very low bar for evidence, and as can be seen by the poll I made, the three related to ages in the Bible tend to show the most as to unbelief. But of course there are other religious forums perhaps easier to fool.
 
SavedByTheLord

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Mock Turtle said:
You apparently have proved it to yourself but you might just have a very low bar for evidence, and as can be seen by the poll I made, the three related to ages in the Bible tend to show the most as to unbelief. But of course there are other religious forums perhaps easier to fool.
Click to expand...
Well for very many things, the polls are almost always wrong in determining truth.
So if I lose the poll I must be right.
 
SavedByTheLord

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
F1fan said:
Correct in a deceptive view.

If you can't get science right, you've lost the debate.
Click to expand...
You need to get the science right so you do not fall the false theory or evolution and billions of years.

How do you explain the Cambrian explosion? In the Cambrian, all the basic body types are present but nothing before it, there are advanced creatures, with eyes, but nothing before it. In the Cambrian, there are advanced creatures like the trilobite but nothing before it; there are a bunch of other advanced features but nothing before it. These all prove evolution and billions of years false.
 
Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
SavedByTheLord said:
You need to get the science right so you do not fall the false theory or evolution and billions of years.

How do you explain the Cambrian explosion? In the Cambrian, all the basic body types are present but nothing before it, there are advanced creatures, with eyes, but nothing before it. In the Cambrian, there are advanced creatures like the trilobite but nothing before it; there are a bunch of other advanced features but nothing before it. These all prove evolution and billions of years false.
Click to expand...
You are incorrect. Your information is about 50 years out of date.

Here is a hint, Do you know what paleontologists keep doing? They keep finding new fossils, or if you prefer "missing links". They are probably averaging around one a day or even more.
 
SavedByTheLord

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Subduction Zone said:
And ne showed you that there were more than one version of even that Bible.

There is no "THE Bible". There is no one single official source.
Click to expand...
So if a forger makes a copy of the Mona Lisa then the is no THE Mona Lisa?
I guess you have problems with the word THE.
I believe a child of about 1 or 2 knows the difference.
I have studied this issue and you are again wrong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top