• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Another irrefutable proof that God created all things using mathematical induction. And a proof that The Bible is the word of God.

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
So if a forger makes a copy of the Mona Lisa then the is no THE Mona Lisa?
I guess you have problems with the word THE.
I believe a child of about 1 or 2 knows the difference.
I have studied this issue and you are again wrong.

Bad analogy. The Bible has relied upon copies of manuscripts for over a thousand years That includes the KJV. It is not original. It is not even close. And at times they did not even use the best sources.

Your version of the Bible was never the "official version". It may have been the official version in England for a while, but guess what? England is not the entire world.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Bad analogy. The Bible has relied upon copies of manuscripts for over a thousand years That includes the KJV. It is not original. It is not even close. And at times they did not even use the best sources.

Your version of the Bible was never the "official version". It may have been the official version in England for a while, but guess what? England is not the entire world.
Again it is amazing how an unbeliever likes to pretend to be an expert in the Bible.
God does not need the originals and certainly can provide an English version.
BTW, do you know why English is and has been the most widely spoken language in the world?
Because God provided the Bible in English.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Again it is amazing how an unbeliever likes to pretend to be an expert in the Bible.
God does not need the originals and certainly can provide an English version.
BTW, do you know why English is and has been the most widely spoken language in the world?
Because God provided the Bible in English.
Are you talking about yourself again? Believing the Bible has nothing to do with understanding it. You demonstrate that every day.

You also do not seem to understand the burden of proof. You claim that the KJV is the official version of the Bible. That is a claim that requires evidence from you.

And no, God did not provide that Bible. King James paid for the experts of his day to translate the Bible. And that has almost nothing to do with the popularity of the English language.

By the way, you are right in one regard. It is the most popular English translation of the Bible. But so what? There are countless English translations. The KJV just had a huge head start.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Are you talking about yourself again? Believing the Bible has nothing to do with understanding it. You demonstrate that every day.

You also do not seem to understand the burden of proof. You claim that the KJV is the official version of the Bible. That is a claim that requires evidence from you.

And no, God did not provide that Bible. King James paid for the experts of his day to translate the Bible. And that has almost nothing to do with the popularity of the English language.

By the way, you are right in one regard. It is the most popular English translation of the Bible. But so what? There are countless English translations. The KJV just had a huge head start.
Again you do not know about the Bible and the Bible says you do not. And again your truth denying is a fulfillment of the prophecies from the Bible thus you are proving the Bible by everything you think, say, do, and write.

10 But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God.

11 For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.
12 Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God.
13 Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.
14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
15 But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man.
16 For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? but we have the mind of Christ. 1 Cor 2:11-16
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member

Again you do not know about the Bible and the Bible says you do not. And again your truth denying is a fulfillment of the prophecies from the Bible thus you are proving the Bible by everything you think, say, do, and write.

10 But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God.

11 For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.
12 Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God.
13 Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.
14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
15 But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man.
16 For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? but we have the mind of Christ. 1 Cor 2:11-16
I am sure that I understand the Bible better than you do. I just do not abuse it in the way that you do. If I cared to I could blaspheme just as often as you.


Getting back to the KJV. There is one church for which the KJV is the "official Bible".

Guess what their approach to evolution is?
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
I am sure that I understand the Bible better than you do. I just do not abuse it in the way that you do. If I cared to I could blaspheme just as often as you.


Getting back to the KJV. There is one church for which the KJV is the "official Bible".

Guess what their approach to evolution is?
You do not understand the Bible at all. The Bible says that you do not.
And of course you just fulfilled more prophecy from the Bible thus proving the Bible.

10 But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God.
11 For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.
12 Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God.
13 Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.
14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
15 But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man.
16 For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? but we have the mind of Christ. - 1 Cor 2:10-16
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
You do not understand the Bible at all. The Bible says that you do not.
And of course you just fulfilled more prophecy from the Bible thus proving the Bible.

10 But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God.
11 For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.
12 Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God.
13 Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.
14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
15 But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man.
16 For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? but we have the mind of Christ. - 1 Cor 2:10-16
Dude, you are just abusing the Bible again. Those are very very weak verses that only prove that the Bible is wrong. Why did you use them?
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Dude, you are just abusing the Bible again. Those are very very weak verses that only prove that the Bible is wrong. Why did you use them?
You are Wrong again.

When did inflation start? And what caused it? Of course it violates cause and effect.

When did inflation end? And what caused it? Of course that too violates cause and effect.
 

McBell

Unbound
Answered already. The King James Bible of 1789.
Have you figured out that multiple versions of THE Bible make no sense?
Before or after the Blayney edition?
Remember, you have already claimed both before and after the Blayney edition and then even claimed it was the Blayney edition.

So now that you have limited it those three, perhaps you can figure out which of the three you have claimed to use is the one you actually use?
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Before or after the Blayney edition?
Remember, you have already claimed both before and after the Blayney edition and then even claimed it was the Blayney edition.

So now that you have limited it those three, perhaps you can figure out which of the three you have claimed to use is the one you actually use?
After as I have said before.
And what multiple versions of the Bible would you recommend?
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Before or after the Blayney edition?
Remember, the Blayney edition came out in 1769, so do not make the same mistake you made before in claiming it as the one you use....
After as I have said many times. Thanks for proving the Bible is true as you always fulfill prophecy.

What was the first living creature?
What version of that answer do you believe?
 

McBell

Unbound
After as I have said many times. Thanks for proving the Bible is true as you always fulfill prophecy.

What was the first living creature?
What version of that answer do you believe?
I take it you still do not know which version of the Bible you use?
With this being the case, how could you possibly know you use THE Bible?
I fail to see how you could possibly know.
Hells bells, how can you even believe it when you do not know which version you use?
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
I take it you still do not know which version of the Bible you use?
With this being the case, how could you possibly know you use THE Bible?
I fail to see how you could possibly know.
Hells bells, how can you even believe it when you do not know which version you use?
Answered and of course you are wrong yet again.
What was the first offspring and how was that even possible?
and of course you keep proving the Bible true all the time as you continually fulfill prophecy.
 

McBell

Unbound
Answered and of course you are wrong yet again.
What was the first offspring and how was that even possible?
and of course you keep proving the Bible true all the time as you continually fulfill prophecy.
So then it is confirmed that you do not know?
Which means there is no way you can know you use THE Bible.
Does that also mean you can not be trusted to understand the Bible?
I mean other than your continual misuse of and misrepresentation of the Bible.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
So then it is confirmed that you do not know?
Which means there is no way you can know you use THE Bible.
Does that also mean you can not be trusted to understand the Bible?
I mean other than your continual misuse of and misrepresentation of the Bible.
Already answered .
Where did the first living thing come into being?
Bingo. You are proving the Bible true with every thought, deed, what you say and want you write.
God is causing you to do it too.

Your lack of answers and constant use of debate 101 techniques prove evolution is a lie and billions of years is too.
 

McBell

Unbound
Already answered .
Where did the first living thing come into being?
Bingo. You are proving the Bible true with every thought, deed, what you say and want you write.
God is causing you to do it too.

Your lack of answers and constant use of debate 101 techniques prove evolution is a lie and billions of years is too.
Nope.
You have not clarified which version you use.
You have seemingly narrowed down to two, so I guess that is progress.

Since you have shown, ad nauseum, that you do not know what the word "proof" means, your claims of "proof" are nothing more than wishful thinking on your part.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Nope.
You have not clarified which version you use.
You have seemingly narrowed down to two, so I guess that is progress.

Since you have shown, ad nauseum, that you do not know what the word "proof" means, your claims of "proof" are nothing more than wishful thinking on your part.
What was the first living creature?
 
Top