Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
You have many already proven false assumptions.
Once again, prove it. Just claiming that and running away is admitting that you are wrong. I am not afraid, why are you so afraid? What are you afraid of?
That is not science.
I have already shown things that conflict with the nonsensical conclusions of evolution and billions of years and you ignore them.
No, you only use the sort of arguments that refute your god.
Say that I asked a bunch of stupid and irrelevant questions about God that you could not answer. Does that refute God? Think about your answer carefully.
That is not science.
You do not seem to know what science is. Once again you need to support your claims. Just claiming things is no different from admitting that you are wrong.
You have no answer to the origin of anything. So there is no real theory at all.
That is not true at all. You just ask about the origin of irrelevant things. Remember how one has to be able to justify one's questions? You were never able to do that.
That is not science.
All evolution and billions of years has is censorship, propaganda, indoctrination and lies of various kinds,
Oh no, more apparently false claims that need support. You cannot just claim this, you need to support it with actual evidence.
What do you mean by your "no God assumption". I can assure you that there is no such assumption. That is why most Christians accept the fact of evolution. And once again running away from your burden of proof is the same as you admitting that you are wrong.The no God assumption, which even the most committed atheists says cannot be absolute, and has been proven false with many infallible proofs, is used absolutely when determining the age of everything.
That is anti science, not real science.
In a debate one is not allowed to run away.