• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Another irrefutable proof that God created all things using mathematical induction. And a proof that The Bible is the word of God.

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
You have many already proven false assumptions.

Once again, prove it. Just claiming that and running away is admitting that you are wrong. I am not afraid, why are you so afraid? What are you afraid of?
That is not science.
I have already shown things that conflict with the nonsensical conclusions of evolution and billions of years and you ignore them.

No, you only use the sort of arguments that refute your god.

Say that I asked a bunch of stupid and irrelevant questions about God that you could not answer. Does that refute God? Think about your answer carefully.
That is not science.

You do not seem to know what science is. Once again you need to support your claims. Just claiming things is no different from admitting that you are wrong.
You have no answer to the origin of anything. So there is no real theory at all.

That is not true at all. You just ask about the origin of irrelevant things. Remember how one has to be able to justify one's questions? You were never able to do that.
That is not science.
All evolution and billions of years has is censorship, propaganda, indoctrination and lies of various kinds,

Oh no, more apparently false claims that need support. You cannot just claim this, you need to support it with actual evidence.
The no God assumption, which even the most committed atheists says cannot be absolute, and has been proven false with many infallible proofs, is used absolutely when determining the age of everything.
That is anti science, not real science.
What do you mean by your "no God assumption". I can assure you that there is no such assumption. That is why most Christians accept the fact of evolution. And once again running away from your burden of proof is the same as you admitting that you are wrong.

In a debate one is not allowed to run away.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Once again, prove it. Just claiming that and running away is admitting that you are wrong. I am not afraid, why are you so afraid? What are you afraid of?


No, you only use the sort of arguments that refute your god.

Say that I asked a bunch of stupid and irrelevant questions about God that you could not answer. Does that refute God? Think about your answer carefully.


You do not seem to know what science is. Once again you need to support your claims. Just claiming things is no different from admitting that you are wrong.


That is not true at all. You just ask about the origin of irrelevant things. Remember how one has to be able to justify one's questions? You were never able to do that.


Oh no, more apparently false claims that need support. You cannot just claim this, you need to support it with actual evidence.

What do you mean by your "no God assumption". I can assure you that there is no such assumption. That is why most Christians accept the fact of evolution. And once again running away from your burden of proof is the same as you admitting that you are wrong.

In a debate one is not allowed to run away.
what was the first living creature?
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Impossible as I have already shown.

No, you never did that. You only used arguments that disprove God by your standards.
Did it have DNA, RNA, proteins or some mixture?
Does God prefer bananas to peaches?

See, by your standards I just refuted God. I hope that you are proud of yourself. And if you claim that I did not then you are also claiming that you failed with your silly question. Once again, you have to be consistent with the arguments that you use. If you use a form of an argument as "proof" your opponents can use that same form against you.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
Evolution is the anti science and the False science predicted to happen in the last days, an amazing prediction from the Bible made about 2000 years ago With exact detail and exact timing.
Really? The Bible says "anti science" and mentions evolution specifically? Show us this text. And point out this exact detail so we can know you aren't making this up.

Or are you guessing again with your poor interpretive abilities?
Paganism repackaged for people caught and taken by Satan in the last days.
If Satan means deception then creationism is the deceptive fraud that you should be wary of, not science. But someone took advantage of your gullibility and you don't know it.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Really? The Bible says "anti science" and mentions evolution specifically? Show us this text. And point out this exact detail so we can know you aren't making this up.

Or are you guessing again with your poor interpretive abilities?

If Satan means deception then creationism is the deceptive fraud that you should be wary of, not science. But someone took advantage of your gullibility and you don't know it.
The Bible says science falsely so called,
So evolution and billions of years are that and predicted to happen in our very time, an exact prediction.

Did the first living thing have DNA, RNA, proteins or a mix?
 

The Hammer

Skald
Premium Member
The Bible says science falsely so called,
So evolution and billions of years are that and predicted to happen in our very time, an exact prediction.

Did the first living thing have DNA, RNA, proteins or a mix?

The Bible proved evolution long before we even understood it.

Did the first Deific being have a physical hand in creation, if so what did his hands look like? Is God made of Spirit, Blood, Wine, Bread or is it a mix?

Edited: Because Cremation is not Creation lol
 
Last edited:

The Hammer

Skald
Premium Member
You have that backwards.

I already tried to show him it supported it.

But he doesn't want to entertain that. Honestly I get it. Cognitive dissonance is painful to be rid of.

My wife's whole congregation believes evolution, and so does my friend and his congregation, who is also Christian.

It's a shame people can't see the point is to unite and not tear down ideas.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
I already tried to show him it supported it.

But he doesn't want to entertain that. Honestly I get it. Cognitive dissonance is painful to be rid of.

My wife's whole congregation believes evolution, and so does my friend and his congregation, who is also Christian.

It's a shame people can't see the point is to unite and not tear down ideas.
Wow. They are being mislead then. More Biblical prophecies being fulfilled with exact details and timing.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I already tried to show him it supported it.

But he doesn't want to entertain that. Honestly I get it. Cognitive dissonance is painful to be rid of.

My wife's whole congregation believes evolution, and so does my friend and his congregation, who is also Christian.

It's a shame people can't see the point is to unite and not tear down ideas.
Worldwide most Christians believe evolution. Of the first world countries the US is almost the most backwards in this regard. Only Turkey has a higher percentage of creationists.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Wow. They are being mislead then. More Biblical prophecies being fulfilled with exact details and timing.
Your sort of prophecies are worthless because people can interpret them to mean anything. If you want to have a discussion about prophecies we can do that too. But I predict that you will run away when it is obvious to even you that you are wrong. I have seen you do that again and again here.
 
Top