• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Another irrefutable proof that God created all things using mathematical induction. And a proof that The Bible is the word of God.

The Hammer

Skald
Premium Member
Your sort of prophecies are worthless because people can interpret them to mean anything. If you want to have a discussion about prophecies we can do that too. But I predict that you will run away when it is obvious to even you that you are wrong. I have seen you do that again and again here.

Yup, it would be interesting to see what prophecies they keep referencing as being fulfilled.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Interesting I had thought it was mostly a US problem. But Turkey? Hmmm.

Now I have more things to read about.
Turkey barely qualifies as a first world country. Here it is reduced to a chart:

1697178756444.png
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Yup, it would be interesting to see what prophecies they keep referencing as being fulfilled.
A lot of biblical prophecies are failed prophecies because they are so vague that there are multiple interpretations of when they were fuflilled.

RationalWiki has a vey good article on biblical prophecies:


They have some very good standards on what terms must be met for a "true biblical prophecy":

Criteria for a true prophecy[edit]​

For a statement to be Biblical foreknowledge, it must fit all of the five following criteria:

  1. It must be accurate. A statement cannot be Biblical foreknowledge if it is not accurate, because knowledge (and thus foreknowledge) excludes inaccurate statements. TLDR: It's true.
  2. It must be in the Bible. A statement cannot be Biblical foreknowledge if it is not in the Bible, because Biblical by definition foreknowledge can only come from the Bible itself, rather than modern reinterpretations of the text. TLDR: It's in plain words in the Bible.
  3. It must be precise and unambiguous. A statement cannot be Biblical foreknowledge if meaningless philosophical musings or multiple possible ideas could fulfill the foreknowledge, because ambiguity prevents one from knowing whether the foreknowledge was intentional rather than accidental. TLDR: Vague "predictions" don't count.
  4. It must be improbable. A statement cannot be Biblical foreknowledge if it reasonably could be the result of a pure guess, because foreknowledge requires a person to actually know something true, while a correct guess doesn't mean that the guesser knows anything. This also excludes contemporary beliefs that happened be true but were believed to be true without solid evidence. TLDR: Lucky guesses don't count.
  5. It must have been unknown. A statement cannot be Biblical foreknowledge if it reasonably could be the result of an educated guess based off contemporary knowledge, because foreknowledge requires a person to know a statement when it would have been impossible, outside of supernatural power, for that person to know it. TLDR: Ideas of the time don't count.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
A lot of biblical prophecies are failed prophecies because they are so vague that there are multiple interpretations of when they were fuflilled.

RationalWiki has a vey good article on biblical prophecies:


They have some very good standards on what terms must be met for a "true biblical prophecy":

Criteria for a true prophecy[edit]​

For a statement to be Biblical foreknowledge, it must fit all of the five following criteria:

  1. It must be accurate. A statement cannot be Biblical foreknowledge if it is not accurate, because knowledge (and thus foreknowledge) excludes inaccurate statements. TLDR: It's true.
  2. It must be in the Bible. A statement cannot be Biblical foreknowledge if it is not in the Bible, because Biblical by definition foreknowledge can only come from the Bible itself, rather than modern reinterpretations of the text. TLDR: It's in plain words in the Bible.
  3. It must be precise and unambiguous. A statement cannot be Biblical foreknowledge if meaningless philosophical musings or multiple possible ideas could fulfill the foreknowledge, because ambiguity prevents one from knowing whether the foreknowledge was intentional rather than accidental. TLDR: Vague "predictions" don't count.
  4. It must be improbable. A statement cannot be Biblical foreknowledge if it reasonably could be the result of a pure guess, because foreknowledge requires a person to actually know something true, while a correct guess doesn't mean that the guesser knows anything. This also excludes contemporary beliefs that happened be true but were believed to be true without solid evidence. TLDR: Lucky guesses don't count.
  5. It must have been unknown. A statement cannot be Biblical foreknowledge if it reasonably could be the result of an educated guess based off contemporary knowledge, because foreknowledge requires a person to know a statement when it would have been impossible, outside of supernatural power, for that person to know it. TLDR: Ideas of the time don't count.
Exactly and the very many of the prophecies from the Bible have come true with exact details and timing.
All meeting the criteria you listed.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Then why can't I find any such prophecies? Why can't you post any such prophecies.

Why don't you post one and we can see if it meets the standards that I listed.
I have and you just ignored them.
What do you think about the attack on Israel?
That fulfills many Biblical prophecies.
 

ratiocinator

Lightly seared on the reality grill.
Then remove those beams out of your eyes.
Since most of your posts consist of spamming endless questions that a simple bit of searching would get you the answers to, and then totally ignoring any substantive answers you get (or dismiss it with another baseless assertion), accusing others of ignoring you is staggering double standards.

I've looked at many supposed biblical prophecies and they've all turned out to be a joke. Wishful thinking doesn't get near to covering it.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Unargued assertion. Endless unargued assertions suggest a lack of confidence and/or evasion. You need to be specific about what verses you refer to and how they relate to what happened.
That would be a good description of evolution and billions of years,

The proof I gave using mathematical induction is irrefutable.
 

ratiocinator

Lightly seared on the reality grill.

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
So you can't provide any specifics about your assertion of fulfilled prophecy. Hence, we can all disregard it.


It was mathematically and logically illiterate.
Well since you did not like it, that means that they were irrefutable.

Have you met the challenge I gave yet?
 

ratiocinator

Lightly seared on the reality grill.
Well since you did not like it, that means that they were irrefutable.
:facepalm: Non sequitur.

Have you met the challenge I gave yet?
Lots of them. As have other people. Ignoring the answers does not mean they don't exist and demonstrates nothing but your own insecurity and inability to engage with anything you don't like.

Also still running away from providing specifics of your supposed fulfilled prophecy...
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
:facepalm: Non sequitur.


Lots of them. As have other people. Ignoring the answers does not mean they don't exist and demonstrates nothing but your own insecurity and inability to engage with anything you don't like.

Also still running away from providing specifics of your supposed fulfilled prophecy...
Bingo. You are a fulfilling machine.

Where did the universe come from?

If the explanation is the Bing Bang with or without inflation, what was there before that?
 
Top