Another irrefutable proof that God created all things using mathematical induction. And a proof that The Bible is the word of God.

[TagliatelliMonster]

Well the Biology book I am using for links will probably address that in another chapter.

How would you know, since you didn't read it...

All you do is quote mine it to then make retarded and intellectually dishonest arguments from ignorance, incredulity, etc

Bearing false witness. I think your religion says something about that immoral practice.

 

[Subduction Zone]

What amino acids and what sequences of amino acids were present in the first living creature ?

You don't get to ask sequences. Try again.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

You don't get to ask sequences. Try again.

Well I already proved that a very large specific sequence of amino acids is impossible by natural processes.
Just seeing if you can defend your own beliefs.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Well I already proved that a very large specific sequence of amino acids is impossible by natural processes.

You misspelled "claimed"

 

[ratiocinator]

Well I already proved that a very large specific sequence of amino acids is impossible by natural processes.

Exodus 23:1

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Exodus 23:1

Well you should take that to heart,

Real science shows evolution and billions of years are false science.

Figure 6-83, The hsp70 family of molecular chaperones - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

 

[ratiocinator]

Real science shows evolution and billions of years are false science.

Untrue.

Figure 6-83, The hsp70 family of molecular chaperones - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

Irrelevant.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Untrue.


Irrelevant.

So now all evidence is irrelevant.
That is not science.

Figure 6-87, Ubiquitin and the marking of proteins with multiubiquitin chains - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[ratiocinator]

So now all evidence is irrelevant.
That is not science.

No. I'm asking you to show the relevance. You keep on making claims and posting links that don't support them.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

No. I'm asking you to show the relevance. You keep on making claims and posting links that don't support them.

Of course it is relevant. I would not have posted it if it was not,

Behold the glory of God's creation.

Figure 6-89, Protein aggregates that cause human disease - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[Subduction Zone]

Well I already proved that a very large specific sequence of amino acids is impossible by natural processes.
Just seeing if you can defend your own beliefs.

No, you only made claims that can be refuted by an handwave. Once again:

Three you go, you have been refuted. I may have to give him a rest soon.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Of course it is relevant. I would not have posted it if it was not,

Behold the glory of God's creation.

Figure 6-89, Protein aggregates that cause human disease - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

That is just another claim and a quote mine of an article that does not support you:

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Of course it is relevant. I would not have posted it if it was not,

Behold the glory of God's creation.

Figure 6-89, Protein aggregates that cause human disease - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Thor slayed the ice giants.
It is relevant because I would not post it if it wasn't.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Thor slayed the ice giants.
It is relevant because I would not post it if it wasn't.

Well it is relevant to Thor and the ice giants. That is true.

And this is relevant to disproving evolution and billons of years.

 

[F1fan]

Well I already proved that a very large specific sequence of amino acids is impossible by natural processes.
Just seeing if you can defend your own beliefs.

This doesn't mean your religious beliefs are true. Where is your evidence?

 

[Sargonski]

Well I already proved that a very large specific sequence of amino acids is impossible by natural processes.
Just seeing if you can defend your own beliefs.

you proved no such thing -- and you know this is deception on your part as we have been over this ?! You have not stated the assumptions about natural processes made in your calculation.... nor considered that the hand of God may be a natural process .. what did your assumption on that front .. not that you even considered it .. but now that you know .. tell us your assumption

Falsehood with forked tongue is the way of the decepticons Brother SBTL -- Faith based on weak sand foundation -- collapsing with even the slightest crack to one pillar .. Such a faith is not what salvation is made of according to the words of our Lord Jesus .. as opposed to Salvation by Lord Marty.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

you proved no such thing -- and you know this is deception on your part as we have been over this ?! You have not stated the assumptions about natural processes made in your calculation.... nor considered that the hand of God may be a natural process .. what did your assumption on that front .. not that you even considered it .. but now that you know .. tell us your assumption

Falsehood with forked tongue is the way of the decepticons Brother SBTL -- Faith based on weak sand foundation -- collapsing with even the slightest crack to one pillar .. Such a faith is not what salvation is made of according to the words of our Lord Jesus .. as opposed to Salvation by Lord Marty.

The following is not possible with evolution even with billions of years.

 

[John53]

The following is not possible with evolution even with billions of years.

Why?

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Why?

Defend your theory . You will not because you can not.
what was the first living creature and what features did it have?

 

[John53]

Defend your theory . You will not because you can not.
what was the first living creature and what features did it have?

You're the one making the claim and I don't have a theory to defend. I do have a hypothesis on eye stripes on birds but I don't have the knowledge or ability to submit it anywhere other than the local bird club. I could try and defend that if you're interested.