• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

are all vaishnavites conservative

ratikala

Istha gosthi
dear freind ,

Friend ratikala,

It was nice to read your above post.
However you have spoken about your nature and if you are attributing it to *vaishnavism* then am not sure.

ah ha ... that is me , ...my nature .... coming in to contact with the vasnava marg , and my nature responding to the vaisnava marg , ... my nature responding to the vaisnava deitys out of an inate love , .. from somewhere within the core of my being .



Personally feel 99% of what we are are from our past karma as we as beings are in existence since ... eternally?
:yes: exactly , and it is that which shapes the nature of a person .
whatever and one life is a very very tiny part to attribute our nature to our associations in this life.
what I am calling a persons "nature" , is that which you refer to as the imprints of previous karmas , as our past actions shape our "nature" in this life , and very much dictate the path we seek out or find our selves willing to accept .

there is another aspect to the nature of a person ,.. and that is , through our sincere practice(over life times) the clouded mind becomes clearer , thus slowly realising ones true nature , realising ones relationship with the lord . .... ones attatchment to self deminishes and the propencity to serve becomes greater , attatchment to the supreme becomes greater , the service is in a way the vaisnavas meditation .


Personally only feel [no knowledge] that must have practiced all known paths in previous lives to reach where paths are unimportant, only meditation IS to keep in connection!
quite possibly so , as each of our natures is diferent , the permutations of the efects of karma are complex and beyond average conception .
and in ways un important , for to attatch to past lives would simply serve as another fetter , to accept their influence upon the nature of our being today is prehaps all we need consern our selves with .



now , the path of the meditator ? ....is prehaps one who has generated the same desire to detatch from the self , but simply uses a different path by which to acheive a ballendced level of non atatchment and awareness .

exactly what a vaisnava is doing , desolving the illusuory sence of self , and realizing the supreme .


Your views?

Love & rgds
my veiws ? ......like you , ...fellings that we are continuing our practice through countless lifetimes , and through those lifetimes we develop affections for particular practices , therefore what works for one may not be so suitable for another , yet we are doing two things either raising our conciousness or burying it , meaning we are either developing wisdom and insight or we are increasing our ignorance .
 

ratikala

Istha gosthi
dear prabhu ji ,

Thank You.

Yes, and at times I have defended Gaudiya Vaishnava tradition on RF. At the same time many Iskcon followers come on and off this site and are very given to criticize the beliefs and practices of others. It seems to be what they are taught to do. I know that in the 1980s 5 of them came into my temple and provoked a public debate with the swami in charge. They had their clock cleaned (the swami was extremely polite but firm and made them look very bad ) and they walked out of the temple with their tail between there legs. This type of thing happens a lot with this group.

this kind of thing I find most sad , my grandmother who was of no strong religious following , but a simple wise and humble soul allways dissueded us from criticism ,

and the buddhist half of me says do not desturb others , if what they practice is of some benifit to them ...jai jai

I also find Gaudiya Vaishnavism very beautiful. Believe it or not my Bengali Shaktism that I follow have similar style to the worship that I feel very comfortable with.
all true devotion is beautifull , I love to see anothers expression of devotion , even within vaisnavism there is so much variation in tradition from temple to temple , yet there is a concurrent thread of love which runs between .

I am girlie also, I do puja at my temple. So does my 13 year old son on fridays he leads aarti.
jai jai to your son , what a fortunate birth :bow: and my husband is a bit of a girlie too , he cooks and I serve , its called colaboration , we are a very good team .
 

zenzero

Its only a Label
Friend ratikala,

Thank you for your response.
Yes only find existence to be of consciousness and unconsciousness and all that is needed is to find THAT state of balances where they appear as one or none!

Love & rgds
 

Vrindavana Das

Active Member
Let me just be direct. I do not see A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada as a saint but just a spiritual seeker.

That is alright. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions. I think otherwise, and more than 90% of the religious world agrees. But then that is my opinion.

This is because he hand pick people to work with children that turned out to be the worse abusers possible. The ISKCON gurukulas were living hells for 100's children. For this reason it is impossible for me to take Prabhupada seriously as a good judge of character and as such He cannot be a seer.(in my mind at least)

This world has all kinds of people. Good...bad...all. I think Swami Prabhupada has given a chance to all for achieving what this world is lacking and is desperate need of the hour - God consciousness. I think we should thank him for giving humanity that opportunity. What I make of that opportunity, that is a different issue.

Some have utilized the opportunity, some have misused, some have let go...why blame someone else for someone else's karmas.

This is a valid comment because of your use of his comments as if they are scripture. They are not. He was a nice man who was an Idealist who was naive and ignorant of human behavior. This is the best spin I can put on Prabhupada.

I quote from the scriptures with original sanskrit verses. All the translations, with word-to-word meaning and explanations are scriptures only. Yes, if you think they are not scriptures, please prove your point with logic, use of scriptures, etc. I am open.

As a person who worked with abused kids. This issue is very important to me. I do not believe it is dharmic to stay silent on these issues.

You may be right. The issue maybe very close to your heart, and I respect your sentiments. If you take up such issues with human rights organization, it can actually help. We should discuss God & religion in a religious forum. That is my opinion.

I must say that from what I see today Iskcon has done all the right things to protect kids from this type of abuse and I :bow: to them for that.

Though I am not an ISKCONite, I :bow: to you for your positive outlook. We should help wherever we can. But if we can't, we should carry on with our quest for God consciousness...hoping & praying for the ability to be able to help, by becoming Lord's instrument of compassion... someday! :)
 

Vrindavana Das

Active Member
Hand has four fingers and a thumb. All are not equal. Yet, each has it's individual function. All are unique and important.

A man cannot become a mother and a woman cannot become a father. Advocating equality of the two is simply childish. Both should recognize and respect the other for their unique and special place and contribution. Both are unique and both are important.
 

DeviChaaya

Jai Ambe Gauri
Premium Member
Hand has four fingers and a thumb. All are not equal. Yet, each has it's individual function. All are unique and important.

A man cannot become a mother and a woman cannot become a father. Advocating equality of the two is simply childish. Both should recognize and respect the other for their unique and special place and contribution. Both are unique and both are important.

What about equality in difference, dear Vrindavan Dasa?
 
Top