mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
They also had this need to produce quality and not quantity as it applies to their weapons..... 1 Tiger tank may easily defeat a Sherman.... but it can't defeat several Shermans
And then add a Firefly.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
They also had this need to produce quality and not quantity as it applies to their weapons..... 1 Tiger tank may easily defeat a Sherman.... but it can't defeat several Shermans
A very reliable source told me that it wasn't dems who hired Crooks to eliminate Trump.That's your evidence?
Liz Cheney supported Harris over the President she voted to impeach?
From that you've ascertained that Democrats want to send ground troops into Russia? What?
It wasn't. Some stupid kid tried to kill him. And failed.A very reliable source told me that it wasn't dems who hired Crooks to eliminate Trump.
It was some stupid kid.If it wasn't dems...I wonder who did it...
Sorry, why have you changed the subject?If it's not left, it's right.
No, they were out produced. Numbers by themselves are no guarantee of anything in war.
If that was the case 100 soldiers with rifles would win against 10 in a tank and IFV for the relevant terrain.
In war, terrain, initiative, logics, technology and manpower counts. But you need more than just manpower.
Whatever...a kid from the right-wing.It wasn't. Some stupid kid tried to kill him. And failed.
It was some stupid kid.
I'd ask what evidence you have that the "dems" had something to do with it, but I already know you don't have any and you've just pulled that out of your backside.
Sorry, why have you changed the subject?
This was all in response to, "That's your evidence? Liz Cheney supported Harris over the President she voted to impeach?
From that you've ascertained that Democrats want to send ground troops into Russia? What?"
There are the historical documents that prove that the Nazis said that the war would be a matter of months...and then there would be a treaty of peace.I would also attribute some of it as having a greater will to win if one is defending their lives, families, and homes on their own soil, as opposed to someone from the opposite side who is on foreign soil and attacking targets unknown to them. If they don't know why they're fighting, their heart may not be in it.
I would also attribute some of it as having a greater will to win if one is defending their lives, families, and homes on their own soil, as opposed to someone from the opposite side who is on foreign soil and attacking targets unknown to them. If they don't know why they're fighting, their heart may not be in it.
They also had this need to produce quality and not quantity as it applies to their weapons..... 1 Tiger tank may easily defeat a Sherman.... but it can't defeat several Shermans
Or a swarm of T-34s.
But that is a good point. Those Tiger tanks were gas guzzlers. Can't run a mechanized military without gas. But it wouldn't have mattered in the long run, since the Allies had overwhelming air superiority towards the end of the war. Control of the skies is paramount.
But now, the next step seems to be control of space.
Yeah, there is also that, but it won't win wars on its own. It is a multifactor process in regards to civilized warfare.
So, to be clear, you don't have any actual evidence that the Democrats want to put American troops on the ground in Ukraine/Russia.Whatever...a kid from the right-wing.
So...no dems.
I don't care who wins.
They tried negotiations at the start of the war.I just want this war to terminate. But the only way is negotiations. Not war.
Ukraine cannot win against Russia.
It's ridiculous.
Depends what you mean by "defeated".Let me understand: so you want this war to continue, until Russia is defeated?
Sooner or later Ukrainians will all die in the war.Is it? Russia invaded with the intention of taking over the entire country in a matter of days; weeks at most.
We are 2 years further now and Russia didn't even manage to take half of the country. In fact, they are even losing own territory now.
It doesn't seem so ridiculous to me.
At least you have to admit that they are putting up one hell of a fight...
Depends what you mean by "defeated".
I want the war to end, obviously.
Just like the vast majority in 1942 would have wanted the war to end.
But not at any cost... Not by bending the knee to an invading bully.
Some things are worth fighting for, no matter how horrible the fighting may be.
The funny thing is that young and vital president believes Europeans will go to the steppe to fight that stupid war...
War is not a simple game of adding up bodies.Math is logic.
Russian population: 144, 2 million.
Ukrainian population: 38 million.
I guess that you don't need to be a genius to understand that it's impossible that Ukrainians win.
They are outnumbered.
So, to be clear, you don't have any actual evidence that the Democrats want to put American troops on the ground in Ukraine/Russia.
"If Putin takes Ukraine, he won't stop there," Biden warned.