CG Didymus
Veteran Member
If he had infallible knowledge from God that he had access to, then he should have said something about Krishna and Buddha... And maybe Sikhs. And now that I know about Hud and Salif, it makes even more strange that he didn't mention all the incarnations of Vishnu. Even if all he did was to say they weren't real. Baha'is straightened out Christianity. They told them that their God/man was not a God and that he is dead. Why not do the same for those Hindus that believe Krishna and those others are not incarnations of Vishnu. And probably, also, that there is no Vishnu.What matters is, all those subjects are in Iqan. A Book written by Baha'u'llah who did not have religious education, who wrote the Book in two days.
I always asked that question. If Baha'u'llah did not have religious education, how was He aware of all those concepts in other religions?
Oh, and he took the time to straighten out the Jews. All this time they thought Isaac was the son. But no, it was Ishmael. Infallible God knowledge or just building off of Islamic beliefs? And where did he get that story about Noah? Is that based on Islam also? The claim is he is the infallible mouthpiece of God. That is questionable to some of us.