I was actually being facetious. "Literature" is one of those things that is an artificial construct with no consistent criteria, so it's pretty useless as a label anyway.
I've read numerous "genre fiction" novels that blow many "classics of literature" out of the water, yet they will never be classified as "literature".
It goes the same with graphic novels - many are of very high quality. However, the visual aspect separates them from novels enough that defining them as "literature", seems a tad silly. This isn't a comment on quality, only on incorrectness of definition.
I pretty much agree. Defining literature is the same impossible task of defining art; the criteria varies too wildly. I suppose my vague definition of lit' as a poem/novel/play/etc. as something that best represents the era it was written, and continues to offer some relevant insight into the modern world is about as ambiguous yet close as I can get. So definitely, there are literary quality comics out there.
Oh man I'd love to make this a Liefield bashing thread 'cause if anyone deserved it...
Then again, I'm critical of the Jim Lees of the industry as well- the 90s heralded a decade of some woefully mediocre talent, foil covers, exorbitantly inflated prices, and just plain silly characters. But I won't go down that path.
Moore's
From Hell is as exemplary a literary expression as anything Pynchon has done.
Maus is as important and heart wrenchingly honest as
To Kill a Mockingbird imho;
Jimmy Corrigan is representative of literature in that it is packed with symbolism, explores universal themes like alienation, and can be incredibly frustrating and obtuse.
Scalped is equal to most crime literature I've read from Chandler to Hammett.
League of Extraordinary Gentlemen is a literary comic about, well, literary characters. And it's absolutely flawless. I could go on and on...
But I also agree with that solid writing trumps art- of course as a nerdy 7 year old first picking up my older brothers copies of the Dark Phoenix saga it was all about the Byrne/Austin eye candy. The emotional punch of Jean's death still knocked me on my *** though. But the older I got the more forgiving I was of mediocre visuals as long as the stories and characters were compelling. Grant Morrisson's brilliant
Animal Man is a good example: horrible art, wonderful writing. But it's always best when both are exemplary: like Moore and Veitch on
Swamp Thing,
Miracle Man, the recent Whedon/Cassady run on
Astonishing X-Men (Cassady is as near a perfect comic artist as Neal Adams),
Watchmen,
From Hell,
League', DeMatteis and Jon Muth's
Moonshadow (which I think far surpasses Gaiman's
Sandman stuff as an adult fairy tale wonderfully written and painted). I'll think of more.
But all I need suggest now is that
Super-F***ers is awesome. If you have the sense of humor of a 12 year old boy that is. And I do. It amuses me.