If having an ontology, accompanied with their view of existence and rejection of the ideologies of others
if all of this is not an ideology ..what an ideology would be?!
A rejection of your ontology is not itself an ontology. If I reject the existence of mermaids, for example, I am not expressing an alternative ontology.
Indeed atheism is almost a religion, it has its preachers, institutions
they just need to call them churches.
Sweeping generalization. An individual atheist might be a communist, but that does not mean that all atheists are communists. Atheists are free to adopt any ideology that does not conflict with rejection of belief in gods. Be careful that you do not stereotype atheists on the basis of what some atheists say.
With my appreciation of the high education level of many atheists, What hold atheists back from claiming that its an ideology is that they failed deliver a full explanation about the big questions such as the those of the existence of the universe and its causes.
First of all, your religion has no explanation of the existence or causes of God, a being that is supposed to have created the universe. So it offers no ultimate explanation of the existence of the universe. Secondly, the question is not whether explanations are offered, but whether the explanations offered have any merit. If I tell you that Bugs Bunny created the universe, that is not necessarily a superior answer to "I do not know."
First I am not sure whether you have read the proofs of the Existence of Good, starting from the ancient philosophical proofs up until now and have falsified all of them
If you have done so them it would be nice to share these researches with other members here in RF.We can have a discussion about them
Nobody here, including yourself, has read everything on the subject, so nobody can conclude on that basis that God exists or does not exist. I am familiar with a great many arguments in favor of the existence of God (or gods), and I will repeat what I said in my last post. I have never seen a compelling argument to support belief in the existence of any god. If you have one, we can discuss it. If you want to argue that there must be some argument among the many that I am unaware of and have not refuted, then please reveal it to me so that I can revise my opinion.
The point is, there are many people who choose to be this and that
You can see that the percentage of people who dont believe that America has done it to the moon is relatively high. I dont think that the problem here is with the proofs about the journey to the moon.
I honestly do not know what the percentage is of Americans who doubt that we have visited the Moon, and I fail to see its relevance here. There will always be people on both sides of every empirical argument. I do not see why that should affect what I believe.
Imagine you are in a building and some one came and told you that the building will collapse soon...
Right here, I have a problem with your hypothetical. If an engineer is telling me that, I would be very concerned. If a child or a crazy person is telling me that, I would be less concerned.
if you go out you will be in the safe side
let it not collapse
if you argue with him
and stay there..then you are in risk
So somebody says to you that you are dying of cancer, but you do not know it yet. This person will sell you a bottle of snake oil to cure your cancer, but it will cost you $1000. Do you buy the snake oil?
...as when you argue that God is not there and resurrection is not there so you should do what you want and ignore what is said that God wants.
Must I believe everything that I am told? Is it forbidden to ask for some reasonable proof that God exists or that Jesus was resurrected? If I am forbidden to ignore these kinds of claims, then is there any claim at all that I can ignore?
The point here is that islam is not one school
Yes in my opinion Muslims belongs to the Wahabi school are more likely to become suicide bombers. and all the September 11 bombers were Wahabis.
OK, so you reject Wahabbism. I have no problem with that, except that I cannot see why you accept Shiism instead. Or Christianity. How do you know that any one religious doctrine is superior to any other?