Are there any Flat Earth believers here?

[Tazarah]

Not even slightly. Predicting a river might dry up one day? Is just good guessing.

NOT CREDIBLE. Just like 100% of your silliness.

That a river would dry up during a certain time period, and militaries would use it as a way of transportation.

Pure silliness, right? That’s a common thing that was always predicted back 2,000+ years ago, right?

Plenty of people in history have predicted that the euphrates river would dry up and be used by the militaries of the eastern world as a means of transportation! Hahaha.

Doesn’t sound half as silly as goldfish morphing into humanoid beings.

 

[Bob the Unbeliever]

Yes everything is a lie, new testament scholars are part of a secret organization intended to lie and control the population.


Thanks God we have people like Richard Carrier that are willing to expose the truth.

If your god were actually real? He would never need people like you OR Carrier to "fight" for your myths.

 

[Bob the Unbeliever]

Really? When has anybody ever witnessed a fish turning into a human, or growing legs? Never.

Anybody ever watch an ape grow into a human? No.

Evolution is a hoax.

And no matter how you try to put it, life cannot come from a non-living source.

That's not how it works. I am so very sorry for your near total lack of a quality education.

The comment above? Demonstrates you know less about evolution OR the theory of evolution, than an average 6th grader.

Which is just sad.

 

[Bob the Unbeliever]

That a river would dry up during a certain time period, and militaries would use it as a way of transportation..

But that's not what your silly BuyBull said, is it? No, it's not....

Nice bit of twisting of reality on your part.

 

[Tazarah]

That's not how it works. I am so very sorry for your near total lack of a quality education.

The comment above? Demonstrates you know less about evolution OR the theory of evolution, than an average 6th grader.

Which is just sad.

That’s not how it works because it doesn’t work at all.

Never in the existence of the known world has any species been observed “evolving” into another because it’s not possible.

All it is is a scientific fantasy.

 

[Tazarah]

But that's not what your silly BuyBull said, is it? No, it's not....

Nice bit of twisting of reality on your part.

That’s exactly what it said.

“And the sixth angel poured out his vial upon the great river Euphrates; and the water thereof was dried up, that the way of the kings of the east might be prepared.” [Revelation 16:12]

 

[Bob the Unbeliever]

That’s not how it works because it doesn’t work at all..

Wrong. I'm so very sorry for your near-total lack of an actual education with respect to science, biology or ... well, anything not religious.

Never in the existence of the known world has any species been observed “evolving” into another because it’s not possible..

Absolutely false. I'm so very sorry for your loss, here.

Hint: Can you cross-breed a Chihuahua dog with a saint Bernard?

no. Therefore? Separate species. ooops!

 

[Bob the Unbeliever]

That’s exactly what it said.

“And the sixth angel poured out his vial upon the great river Euphrates; and the water thereof was dried up, that the way of the kings of the east might be prepared.” [Revelation 16:12]

LMAO! Oh. My. You are hilarious! That is so generic? That even a 5 year old might have said something similar.

WHERE IS THE EXACT DATE? No?

Obviously your god is way too weak to predict a DATE.

Likely due to suffering from an extreme case of not existing.

Oh well.

 

[Tazarah]

Wrong. I'm so very sorry for your near-total lack of an actual education with respect to science, biology or ... well, anything not religious.


Absolutely false. I'm so very sorry for your loss, here.

Hint: Can you cross-breed a Chihuahua dog with a saint Bernard?

no. Therefore? Separate species. ooops!

Yes, you can cross-breed a chihuahua and a saint bernard, it has been done.

https://www.google.com/search?q=saint+bernard+chihuahua+mix&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-us&client=safari

Lmao.

 

[Tazarah]

LMAO! Oh. My. You are hilarious! That is so generic? That even a 5 year old might have said something similar.

WHERE IS THE EXACT DATE? No?

Obviously your god is way too weak to predict a DATE.

Likely due to suffering from an extreme case of not existing.

Oh well.

The beginning of that chapter explains in detail the time period in which the prophecy is supposed to happen.

Where is the exact date that fish began to develop legs? Lmao.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Really? When has anybody ever witnessed a fish turning into a human, or growing legs? Never.

That would support creationism, not evolution.

Anybody ever watch an ape grow into a human? No.

Humans are apes. If you want to be a bit more specific they are great apes like orangutans, chimpanzees, and gorillas.

Evolution is a hoax.

And no matter how you try to put it, life cannot come from a non-living source.

Just because you do not understand something that does not make it a hoax. And prove life cannot come from non-living sources. You lose the argument if you use a strawman or other logical fallacy.

 

[Tazarah]

That would support creationism, not evolution.




Humans are apes. If you want to be a bit more specific they are great apes like orangutans, chimpanzees, and gorillas.



Just because you do not understand something that does not make it a hoax. And prove life cannot come from non-living sources. You lose the argument if you use a strawman or other logical fallacy.

Life cannot come from non-life, that is the first rule of biogenesis.

When has life ever spontaneously arrived from a non-living source?

Why don’t you try to prove that.

 

[siti]

Nice attempt at a straw man, but it’s fallen flat on it’s face.

So straw men are flat too? You really are opening my eyes!

 

[Tazarah]

So straw men are flat too? You really are opening my eyes!

They are if they get stepped on

 

[Subduction Zone]

The beginning of that chapter explains in detail the time period in which the prophecy is supposed to happen.

Where is the exact date that fish began to develop legs? Lmao.

I see that you cannot be reasonable. We do have evidence for when fish evolved into tetrarpods. This one is about right smack dab in the middle:

Acanthostega - Wikipedia

 

[Tazarah]

I see that you cannot be reasonable. We do have evidence for when fish evolved into tetrarpods. This one is about right smack dab in the middle:

Acanthostega - Wikipedia

That is a wikipedia link describing a certain prehistoric species. It says nothing about fish developing limbs.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Life cannot come from non-life, that is the first rule of biogenesis.

When has life ever spontaneously arrived from a non-living source?

Why don’t you try to prove that.

You misunderstand that rule. It applied to modern complex life, not first life. In Pasteur's time people that that flies, even mice and rats, appeared on their own. He demonstrated that those beliefs were incorrect.


You cannot refute a scientific concept if you have no understanding of the sciences. You failed again.

 

[Subduction Zone]

That is a wikipedia link describing a certain prehistoric species. It says nothing about fish developing limbs.

Oh my, you did not understand it. Oh well, I tried.

 

[Tazarah]

You misunderstand that rule. It applied to modern complex life, not first life. In Pasteur's time people that that flies, even mice and rats, appeared on their own. He demonstrated that those beliefs were incorrect.


You cannot refute a scientific concept if you have no understanding of the sciences. You failed again.

Life has never came from a non-living source, unless you have proof.

You cannot prove a scientific concept if you do not have any evidence.

 

[Tazarah]

Oh my, you did not understand it. Oh well, I tried.

“We know that fish are not turning into land animals now, but did they ever? There would have to be big changes in a fish's skeleton to change it into a land animal. It would have to turn its fins into legs with wrists and elbows, and the bones would have to join themselves to the backbone. (And what would have happened to the fins on the top of its back?) It would also need to evolve a neck. The only way we can find out what happened long ago is by looking at fossils. If fish really changed into land animals, we would expect to find fossils showing these changes. But we don't. Millions of fish fossils have been discovered but never one showing them changing into land animals.

Other changes would have been needed, which fossils cannot give us any clues about. Gills would have had to turn into lungs - before the fish left the water. But why would a fish evolve lungs when it was living happily in the water and breathing through gills?

A fish coming on to the land would also need new eyes or it would not be able to see! Land animals need tears to stop their eyes drying up. Tears come from special tear glands, which fish don't have because they don't need them, so where did land animals get theirs? The eyes of land animals are also specially protected to stop them being blinded by harmful rays from the sun. Fish, being under the water most of the time, don't need this protection.“