I’m pro-law.
And laws can very frequently be wrong and immoral.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I’m pro-law.
if a male wanted a child, he should have found someone who was interested and planned accordingly. a non-verbal agreement won't stand up in court on most things.I have not really understood this line of reasoning. We do not use it for any other issue we have. Males do have a stake in the abortion issue. Like it or not the potential child has a father as well. Should a woman not have any say in laws that force men to support their children because they are not men?
I also have a wife, two daughters, a sister, female friends and family members that I love, so it is not like the abortion issued does not affect me in some way. I understand that I do not have to carry the potential child and I am sympathetic to that and understand that I do not know what that is like but males should have a voice in the issue and not abdicate that responsibility.
I am not sure how this is related to my post.if a male wanted a child, he should have found someone who was interested and planned accordingly. a non-verbal agreement won't stand up in court on most things.
I have not really understood this line of reasoning. We do not use it for any other issue we have. Males do have a stake in the abortion issue. Like it or not the potential child has a father as well. Should a woman not have any say in laws that force men to support their children because they are not men?
I also have a wife, two daughters, a sister, female friends and family members that I love, so it is not like the abortion issued does not affect me in some way. I understand that I do not have to carry the potential child and I am sympathetic to that and understand that I do not know what that is like but males should have a voice in the issue and not abdicate that responsibility.
I am not saying a father has any right to force the mother to do anything. But you ignore the fact that another potential person is involved that deserves consideration. Why do you think after a women is pregnant is when she should decide to have a child or not and not before? Very few people are pregnant by force. If a man and women have sex that involves responsibility if a life is created. Both should know that before they have sex.Once you decide to deposit your sperm into a female body, a good percentage of your choice in the matter transfers to the female. She is the one whose body will be permanently altered by the life inside her, with all the trauma (physical and emotional), economic and social impact, and responsibility towards that life.
I am not saying a father has any right to force the mother to do anything. But you ignore the fact that another potential person is involved that deserves consideration. Why do you think after a women is pregnant is when she should decide to have a child or not and not before? Very few people are pregnant by force. If a man and women have sex that involves responsibility if a life is created. Both should know that before they have sex.
I am not saying a father has any right to force the mother to do anything. But you ignore the fact that another potential person is involved that deserves consideration. Why do you think after a women is pregnant is when she should decide to have a child or not and not before? Very few people are pregnant by force. If a man and women have sex that involves responsibility if a life is created. Both should know that before they have sex.
Why? Is it too idealistic to thing a drunk person should decide beforehand not to drive if they get drunk?That is to idealistic in practice.
I support safe sex and contraception but not abortion. What if I said it is hard for humans to avoid drunk driving? Is that an excuse if they hurt someone?It's hard for humans to avoid sex. This is why I advocate for strong communities with birth control options, education, and supports for those in poverty. That includes abortion services and adoption options.
Not the best analogy.. How many cells are needed for something to be "human" or better a "person"? Second an unwanted pregnancy is closer to being like accidentally leaving your door open and someone entering without permission. Having sex is not the same as trying to have a baby. Intent makes a world of difference.I support safe sex and contraception but not abortion. What if I said it is hard for humans to avoid drunk driving? Is that an excuse if they hurt someone?
It only takes two cells to be called a potential person. No one knows how many cells it takes to become a person.Not the best analogy.. How many cells are needed for something to be "human" or better a "person"? Second an unwanted pregnancy is closer to being like accidentally leaving your door open and someone entering without permission. Having sex is not the same as trying to have a baby. Intent makes a world of difference.
So now you are going to ban birth control? That is the first time that "two cells" are involved. I guess we all need to go around the world wrapped in gauze since we regularly lose multiple cells in all sorts of accidents. All of those are potential humans too.It only takes two cells to be called a potential person. No one knows how many cells it takes to become a person.
Also, intent does not matter. One possible result of having sex is pregnancy. Just like one possible result of getting drunk is driving and hurting someone while drunk. I doubt you care about intent anyway. Do you think a person that intends to get pregnant and succeeds should not be allowed to have an abortion?
I never said any of this. I actually said I am for contraception. Maybe ask questions if I am unclear or my statements seem contradictory instead of the gotcha attitude. Do you think this is a serious topic?So now you are going to ban birth control? That is the first time that "two cells" are involved. I guess we all need to go around the world wrapped in gauze since we regularly lose multiple cells in all sorts of accidents. All of those are potential humans too.
Your answers have not been clear. Why are two cells snot even in the uterus yet any different from any other two cells in the human body? There are countless arguments that support choice. The ones that oppose it tend to fail when investigated.I never said any of this. I actually said I am for contraception. Maybe ask questions if I am unclear or my statements seem contradictory instead of the gotcha attitude. Do you think this is a serious topic?
I have no clue into which category I belong, so I don't know which to choose in the poll. But below are my thoughts about it. Maybe the last poll option is mine or "pro choice" if it is only about "to abort or not abort"I get the feeling that sometimes we end up in false dilemmas as a strong one or the other,
so I made 4 choices. And no, you don't have to vote as you can reject all 4 if you like.
Your answers have not been clear. Why are two cells snot even in the uterus yet any different from any other two cells in the human body? There are countless arguments that support choice. The ones that oppose it tend to fail when investigated.
So what? Cloning is real and could be done with humans. Yes, a zygote could become a human, but so could a clone of someone. The only reason it is not done is because of the moral issues. By the way, "unique DNA" is only special pleading. You have as of yet to justify taking over the body of someone else. Physically changing them for life. A person would have a much better case justifying someone temporarily using your body for its kidneys or liver.Two cells that form a new life with unique DNA (zygote) if left alone can become a new person. Do you agree? This happens everyday.
Two skin cells left alone cannot become a new person. Do you agree?
I agree that you are pro life, you are not American prolifeTM but that is a good thing. I am no fan of how they took that phrase and then applied it only to abortions. In other words you are almost surely more pro life than they are.In England and Wales and Soon Scotland, you can now take the termination pills at home after talking to your doctor.
It is entirely up to the woman.
Later abortions need intervention by a doctor, so come with some caveats.
Northern Ireland has some restrictions. But abortions are now legal.
In southern Ireland it has been legal for some time.
I prefer contraception when ever possible, but I am not pro life, what ever that is supposed to mean.
But if for what ever reason a woman wishes to end a pregnancy it should be down to her.
Let's see those arguments. You own position as you're explained it is largely the Christian moral argument. You've likely adopted it without realizing it's origins.You are wrong. There are secular moral reasons to be prolife. There and prolife atheists out there like myself that have reasoned that stance based on our morals.