Seeing some of the names of those who voted "no" convinces me that self-reporting is rarely accurate in such questions.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You just don't understand what I am saying, we are not the just the mind body organism, our true nature is Consciousness, or God if you prefer that name. As long as we believe we are just the body, yes, we are not perfect, but when we realize our true self, the Christ, then we are made perfect, because we are now living in Christ. When I say Christ, I don't mean the mythical man in the bible called Jesus, he only represented the Christ, and made the Christ personalised for those who couldn't understand, that is why he talked in parables, those who were ready, would understand the secret message in the parables, and they were the ones who became perfect in Christ.I hate to break it to you, but you aren't perfect, my friend, and neither am I.
I am QUITE sure you have some faults. I can enjoy life even though I accept the fact of your imperfection. Setting back and doing nothing is perfectly lazy. But as long as you're happy, then it's real. Perfectly real, right?
Because what counts in your world, is that you're happy. Well, cows can be happy. I aspire to more than mere happiness. I have other qualities than merely being passive and happy. Maybe some people can't do any more than smile and be happy. Ok.. yes, I understand that.. BUT sitting on asses aren't the best things in life. We can and SHOULD do better.
All of us should contribute positively to the betterment of mankind. It would not be helpful for everyone to sit down and smile their life away. We NEED more people to DO positive things. You ENJOY the fruits of their labor. You should be advocating that people CONTRIBUTE what they can, and not just take whatever they can in the most passive way possible.
we aren't exactly GOATS
How is that "magic" and what is "magic" anyway?
It's a ritual in which it is believed the wine and bread become the body and blood of Christ. If that isn't a belief in magic then I don't know what is.How is that "magic" and what is "magic" anyway?
I don't know what "magic" is or supposed to be. It means anything.It's a ritual in which it is believed the wine and bread become the body and blood of Christ. If that isn't a belief in magic then I don't know what is.
I don't know what "magic" is or supposed to be. It means anything.
Brit. /ˈmadʒɪk/ , U.S. /ˈmædʒɪk/
Forms: ME magik, ME magyk, ME magyque, ME malgyk, ME maugik, ME–15 magike, ME–15 ... (Show More)
Etymology: < Middle French magique (c1277 in Old French: for the homographic adjective see ... (Show More)
1. a. The use of ritual activities or observances which are intended to influence the course of events or to manipulate the natural world, usually involving the use of an occult or secret body of knowledge; sorcery, witchcraft. Also: this practice as a subject of study.
b. With defining adjective. natural magic n. (also †magic natural) hist. magic involving the manipulation of supposed occult properties of the natural world (usually excluding the conjuration of personal spirits); this skill as a subject of study.
c. An instance of magic; a magical procedure or rite. Also concr.: a magical object, a charm or fetish.
like magic: without any apparent explanation; with incredible rapidity; with great ease. Cf. like adv.,
An inexplicable and remarkable influence producing surprising results; an enchanting or mystical quality; glamour, appeal. Also: exceptional skill or talent, inspired accomplishment.
I don't know what "magic" is or supposed to be. It means anything.
You have made a mistake, check the definition of 'magic' in Merriam Webster again - you missed most of it.Merriam-Webster defines "magic" as "the use of means (as charms or spells) believed to have supernatural power over natural forces" and "an extraordinary power or influence seemingly from a supernatural source."
Catholics believes that when the priest consecrates the Eucharistic host that it is literally transformed into the body of Christ by the supernatural power of God. (The technical term for this belief is known as the doctrine of "transubstantiation'). Such a belief qualifies as a magical belief based on the definition given above.
I was asking for your definition, if, as you say you ARE superstitious, and keep your definition of superstition under your hat, and we have reason to think your definition is peculiar to yourself, then, it's no use to us at all in helping us understand what you mean by it.I never said that I was not superstitious. I voted and my vote is public for everyone to see.
I was asking for your definition, if, as you say you ARE superstitious, and keep your definition of superstition under your hat, and we have reason to think your definition is peculiar to yourself, then, it's no use to us at all in helping us understand what you mean by it.
Don't you communicate to be understood by people? You take the trouble of communicating.. And I have NO idea what you mean by "superstition".
If you could clarify that, it would be helpful. Otherwise, I have no idea what you're talking about. Maybe you don't actually care if people understand your position. I've met quite a few people like that in my world travels, and beyond........
Do you employ any mantras?
I join my family in their rituals. They are theists and superstitious.
Then you're superstitious.
I believe that qualifies as superstition.Not remotely. I find superstition as idiotic as I find religion.
I believe that qualifies as superstition.
Rituals require one to bow to the idol (in my case) and expect that one's wishes will be fulfilled.I believe that religions can have superstitions but I am not sure how rituals fall into that category.