Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
That would essentially be a "HEY! Shoot at me!" sign for the shooter to watch for.Ok, Have the teachers wear a uniform or some kind of symbol logo on there shirt to identify them perhaps.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That would essentially be a "HEY! Shoot at me!" sign for the shooter to watch for.Ok, Have the teachers wear a uniform or some kind of symbol logo on there shirt to identify them perhaps.
I didn’t mention David Duke in any nice way. I just pointed out that both he and Louis Farrakhan haven’t been found to directly go around shooting things up.BLM thugs? Seriously? So i guess the kkk are freedom fighters to you snice you mentioned David duke in a good way. Lol
I guess you also consider Dylan Roof to be a freedom fighter to right?
That would essentially be a "HEY! Shoot at me!" sign for the shooter to watch for.
So? That doesn’t prove whether he was indiscriminate.All 14 of his victims wer white, minus one who looked chinies. But none wer blacks.
So? That doesn’t prove whether he was indiscriminate.
...with their gun locked away.As I said previously I would never expect teachers to actively go out looking for the shooters. But, this way they would have a good chance of stopping a shooter if the shooter did come to their room.
Whichever option leads to the fewest injuries and deaths total is the better one.Yes, better that the teachers are unarmed sitting ducks, right?
Got any evidence for these claims?There is no problem with training costs that can’t be handled simply and inexpensively. Most of the teachers that would volunteer to carry weapons have already trained themselves at qualified gun safety courses. Training costs are not a showstopper by any means and a incidental issues at best.
The above sent to another member......................Got any evidence for these claims?
I think you're right, but I'm always keen toThe above sent to another member......................
These 'arm-teacher' jokers think that if you go on a gun course that you're ready to go back to delivering lesson-plans just as before, but now qualified to become a gun-fighter at some unknown random moment, controlling a class of children, handling racing adrenaline and making life-death decisions 'at the drop of a hat'.
It's daft, but anything so as to keep on keeping on with all them fast-firing weapons that nobody really needs.
... Come on now, do you really think that's a good point?...with their gun locked away.
Well as a teacher that deals with the prospect of guns on campus as a reality I must say that your willingness to let me be a unarmed sitting duck is pretty galling.Whichever option leads to the fewest injuries and deaths total is the better one.
Yes, myself. I’m a teacher and fully capable of bearing all the training needed to bear arms in the classroom on my own dime. That’s all the evidence needed.Got any evidence for these claims?
What's daftest is advocate'n the status quo.The above sent to another member......................
These 'arm-teacher' jokers think that if you go on a gun course that you're ready to go back to delivering lesson-plans just as before, but now qualified to become a gun-fighter at some unknown random moment, controlling a class of children, handling racing adrenaline and making life-death decisions 'at the drop of a hat'.
It's daft, but anything so as to keep on keeping on with all them fast-firing weapons that nobody really needs.
Simple: Don't put teachers into such a position. We already know the police are trigger happy against unarmed civilians. And we want armed ones to face SWAT teams with guns drawn? The effort and time is better spent on developing more effective evacuation guidelines.Do you have a better idea for the police to identify the teacher without the shooter identifying the teacher?
Who says they can have no security? Even around here the school systems have school/campus police, a.k.a. those who have some training to deal with such situations. And, realistically, more guns has not reduced gun violence, so why should we expect arming teachers to have any different outcome?Schools have no security.
I observed what is, not what should be.Who says they can have no security?
The "more guns" complaint misses the point because it's not about totalEven around here the school systems have school/campus police, a.k.a. those who have some training to deal with such situations. And, realistically, more guns has not reduced gun violence, so why should we expect arming teachers to have any different outcome?
Simple: Don't put teachers into such a position. We already know the police are trigger happy against unarmed civilians. And we want armed ones to face SWAT teams with guns drawn? The effort and time is better spent on developing more effective evacuation guidelines.
How do we notify them of this?have as part of the training for the teachers, that when police or swat show up, they immediately drop there gun and raise there hands.