• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

As Arranged, Trump Has Been Acquitted

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
If Sodomite Pete Buttigieg wants to play the Christian then he needs to play by the rules. So get a new dog to run around the arena. Your slur has fleas.
Yeah, that dirty sodomite! I bet he does stuff like cheat on his spouse with porn stars while while his spouse is at home with their newborn child!
I bet he brags about how he grabs people by the crotches and kisses them without their permission! I bet he mocks handicapped people! I bet he refers to immigrants as murderers and rapists! I bet he used his own charity to enrich himself! I bet he defrauded a bunch of students out of an education and then had to pay out a $25 million settlement to cover his fraudulent butt! I bet 17+ people have accused him of sexually harrassing them! I bet he perpetuates racist conspiracy theories about where past presidents were born! I bet he sits around insulting the people he doesn't like all day long calling them all sorts of childish names and making up stories about their wives, parents and children! I bet he purposely walks into change rooms full of teenage girls just so he can catch them off guard with their clothes off so he can ogle them! I bet he tells 10 year olds that he'll be dating them someday! I bet a bunch of the people he fills his administration with will end up in prison for fraud and perjury! The scumbag!

Oh .... wait. That's someone else. Now who could it be .... :rolleyes:
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
You don't know what you were prevented from knowing.
To believe that it's what you hope for is reckless.
Your smarter than this usually.

Trump has done his best to keep people from finding out what actually happened. That tells me a lot about what actually did.

Trump is not an unknown quantity, who just appeared on the national stage the day he announced his candidacy. He's got a decades long record.
That's the context in which I am applying some rational thought to his current behavior.
Tom
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Your smarter than this usually.

Trump has done his best to keep people from finding out what actually happened. That tells me a lot about what actually did.

Trump is not an unknown quantity, who just appeared on the national stage the day he announced his candidacy. He's got a decades long record.
That's the context in which I am applying some rational thought to his current behavior.
Tom
Past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Your smarter than this usually.
Flattery will get you nowhere.
Trump has done his best to keep people from finding out what actually happened. That tells me a lot about what actually did.

Trump is not an unknown quantity, who just appeared on the national stage the day he announced his candidacy. He's got a decades long record.
That's the context in which I am applying some rational thought to his current behavior.
Tom
So you firmly believe what you don't know, eh.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I've seen people on this site point it out to you in the past.
No one provide excerpts which they claim make their case.
They didn't. Columbus doesn't. You don't.
When someone tells me that God exists, I want more than
a directive to read the Bible. Reasoning from evidence, eh.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
Flattery will get you nowhere.

So you firmly believe what you don't know, eh.
I firmly believe that Trump forbade employees to respond to subpoenas from the House.
I firmly believe that Senators who need his support to get reelected voted against shedding any more light on Trump's doings.
I firmly believe that Trump has a long history of greed and deceit, and using underlings to get him out of trouble for his unethical behavior.

Are you claiming that I'm wrong about any of these things?
Tom
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I firmly believe that Trump forbade employees to respond to subpoenas from the House.
I firmly believe that Senators who need his support to get reelected voted against shedding any more light on Trump's doings.
I firmly believe that Trump has a long history of greed and deceit, and using underlings to get him out of trouble for his unethical behavior.

Are you claiming that I'm wrong about any of these things?
Tom
So you're not claiming collusion?
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
1. Pete Buttigieg – an unrepentant Sodomite who wants to make HIS HUSBAND the First Lady / Man in the White House. Yuck.
What's yuck is that. Not him being gay (if he is, I don't know), or a gay president, or a First Man/Husband/Dude/whatever we'd call him.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
That's not evidence of collusion.
Yes it is.
Not conclusive evidence, but it is evident that Trump didn't want the truth known.

Nevertheless, you asked for a fact and said you'd respond to it.
Instead you dodged and squirmed and changed the subject.
Tom
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Yes it is.
Not conclusive evidence, but it is evident that Trump didn't want the truth known.
So Trump hid something.
Not knowing what it is, you know what he hid, ie, collusion.
Nevertheless, you asked for a fact and said you'd respond to it.
Instead you dodged and squirmed and changed the subject.
Tom
I responded.
I said your evidence wasn't evidence of collusion.
You claim belief in something you don't know.
You believers....yours is a different standard for discerning facts.

There are plenty of things about Trump & his various agendas to
criticize.....objective things. So there's really no need to make
unsupportable claims. It distracts from very real concerns.
 
Last edited:

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
So Trump hid something.
Not knowing what it is, you know what he hid, ie, collusion.

I responded.
I said your evidence wasn't evidence of collusion.
You claim belief in something you don't know.
You believers....yours is a different standard for discerning facts.

There are plenty of things about Trump & his various agendas to
criticize.....objective things. So there's really no need to make
unsupportable claims. It distracts from very real concerns.
Comey's report does say things happened. But, also according to Comey you can't indict a sitting president. However, Comey's own words is his findings and report do not exonerate Trump.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Comey's report does say things happened. But, also according to Comey you can't indict a sitting president. However, Comey's own words is his findings and report do not exonerate Trump.
Do you have more than "things happened"?
Lack of exoneration is isn't the same as guilt.
I lack proof there's no God....does that mean He exists?
Magical thinking in religion seeps over into politics, eh.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Do you have more than "things happened"?
Lack of exoneration is isn't the same as guilt.
I lack proof there's no God....does that mean He exists?
Magical thinking in religion seeps over into politics, eh.
It has escaped memory at this point beyond "this person did this" and "someone said that." Comey does basically conclude by saying he isn't saying is guilty, but he's not that is Trump is not guilty, either.
 
Top