• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Ask About Islam

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Guys calm down. No one is gonna leave Islam from this thread and no one is gonna enter due to it lol.
 

Sheldon

Veteran Member
@KWED

He's a proof for God. I never seen your response to this video of mine.


It just seems like a long list of unevidenced assumptions to me, made in the form of a rambling argument for a deity. There are a few begging the question fallacies in there to be sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ppp

Sheldon

Veteran Member
You haven't tested it.

I never claimed to have tested anything, the quote is facile nonsense, and doesn't come close to explaining what we now know about genetics and DNA, and recessive and dominant genes.
 

KWED

Scratching head, scratching knee
You are mixing the hadiths.
I could not find the one you are using. Please post a link.

Anyways, a person once did a study on how scientifically accurate are the "medical" advice of Imams (a) in hadiths. About 60% were accurate, and 40% not scientifically accurate if I recall correctly. And that is what we expect since you have some people fabricating hadiths and other people truthful.
1. I'd be surprised if it was that high.
2. If a medical textbook was known to be half made-up nonsense, it would be withdrawn and pulped rather than revered as something special. Just saying.
 

Sheldon

Veteran Member
Guys calm down. No one is gonna leave Islam from this thread and no one is gonna enter due to it lol.

I am perfectly calm I assure you, but your observation is of course correct. The chance that an online debate will produce a paradigm shift in someone's core ideology, seems very unlikely. Some people can cope with debate, and seeing their core beliefs and ideas viewpoints scrutinised critically, while others seem to struggle. I can't pretend to know why people who struggle with it, then seek it out though.
 

KWED

Scratching head, scratching knee
The one in Tafsir hassan al-Askari (a) says which one is dominant.
No, you claim it says that. You have yet to provide a link to the actual text.
But anywho, as we know that the principles of selective breeding were well known long before Muhammad was alive, it's all irrelevant anyway.
 

Sheldon

Veteran Member
It does. It means if there is a soul, then we know what a soul is. The question is not about how we would know or not. It's then about if do we know or not.
Ok well the first part seems pretty circular to be honest. However can you demonstrate any objective that a soul exists? Otherwise what knowledge are you claiming its existence is based on? If one makes a claim to knowledge, then this would need to demonstrate or shared, otherwise it wouldn't seem to constitute knowledge, but rather a subjective belief or experience.
 

KWED

Scratching head, scratching knee
@KWED

He's a proof for God. I never seen your response to this video of mine.

That was pretty difficult to follow. (You seemed sleepy and distracted. Had it been a long day?)

Were you saying that without the existence of a god we can't have an understanding of who we are?
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Were you saying that without the existence of a god we can't have an understanding of who we are?

Yes. We wouldn't even estimate who we are without knowing there is an accurate reality to who we are, and we wouldn't have a accurate reality without God. We need to exist in his vision for an accurate reality since only his judgement can define us.
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
This is from years ago on another forum in a galaxy far far away (okay I might have made up the galaxy part):

This was discussed earlier. I look at the moon, and I have subjective impression of it's size. However it's size is objectively there. There is nothing I can do about it. I would not however have subjective impression of it's size without belief that there is an objective measurement to it.

When it comes to value of the self, the questions are:

what is it? (1)
how do we see it? (2)
how do we know there is an objective value to it (if any)? (3)
Do we have objective measurement to ourselves? (4)
If so, how do we measure it?(5)
If not, how does this measurement exist and get maintained ?(6)
What role do good actions and bad actions have to do with our quality/value/rank? (7)
What system is in place to make our value objectively increased or decreased depending on our actions, how is this even possible that we inherit actions and increase our value? (8)

First of all, if we say our value is purely subjectively us giving ourselves value, then if someone values us less, and we value ourselves more, what is our true value? If we decide we are the most important person in the world, do we automatically become the most important person in the world?

Do we set our value so if I want to make myself so great in my eyes, then automatically I can do this?

Obviously, we have don't simply assign value to ourselves, but when we judge, we do so with some sort of guesstimate at our true value. We all believe there is a measurement to who we are.

...and that they may know their Lord encompasses everything in number. (Quran)

Our value whatever it is, is not maintained by our perceptions. But we know it requires perception. As it requires perception, there has to be an objective perception who maintains that value.

How do we see it? We can see that we aren't made of some sort of unique value that is totally different then a value in another being, like one human is of totally different type x value and another human being is of y value, and x and y have nothing really in common. There is something binding us. There is something in all this. That something, in the words of Imam Ali, is expressed:

"He is in all things without being merged in them neither separate from them"

The different hues of value, the different forms, the different relationships established through it, are all manifestations of a greater value, a link to something greater, an absolute source and basis, an eternal reality.

As objective value cannot be arbitrary, it follows it's eternal and not something God can create out of nothing. Rather he creates through the truth of vision of himself for witnesses all things in himself.

Naturally we can all see this. That for example, there is something extra special about love. When we value a person to the degree we love them, we are bonding with "value" and valuing in a special way, that transcends and points to something special.

These signs of value, from honor, to courage, to compassion, to affection, are all signs of something greater. Something that these things are emerging from, but are depending to manifest.

That in thing lives inside of us "he is all things..."but he isn't merged into us neither is he separate from us.

The signs point in a way, in which they link to perfection, to one essence, that unites them all in a single absolute reality. They point to transcendence that doesn't lack a single possible existence or praise or beauty or glory or greatness or anything to be valued. The Ultimate Value by which all value emerges from.

This is one of the reflections of Quran "Or are they created from nothing...", contrary to what people might think, this verse is clearly not saying that anyone believes nothing existed and then creation emerged from that. Some humans believe that universe was eternal, however this verse is addressing the polytheists, do they think their essence is created from nothing, their souls are just created by God from nothing. Rather, he created it from water of his own light, his own value, and created through his name/face/light.

Now this explanation of the name of God/face of God the true reality of the human being, how can we know it to be true? This takes sincere reflection upon which we realize that value is not something we simply make up or biological brain assigns and maintains.

Aside from this is how our positive or negative actions play a role in our value. As said before, we don't simply decide we are the best people on earth, and hence become the best person on earth.

There is a value to who we are. When do actions, we inherit it. Our value is actually increased or decreased. We don't decide the degree of that measurement. Sure we may think of ourselves at that moment and have our over all judgement of ourselves, but we all realize if Hitler thinks he is righteous it doesn't make him what he values of himself automatically the true value of himself. His actions degrade him, they put on the negative scale, in - side of zero, not on the positive.

There is something making us inherit our actions, a judge that perceives who we are, because this qualitive type measurement can only be maintained by quality type perception.

It's not like a rock, it has weight, but it doesn't matter if we measure it or not, this is qualitive, in which it depends on perception of who we are and maintaining that and making us inherit our actions.

And so these type of reminders, that we do believe that there is some sort living record to who we are, that it forms the true nature of value of ourselves, even if we underestimate or overestimate ourselves, there is an objective value.

We know these to be true, and would not be able to subjectively value ourselves without belief there is an objective value.

We see these signs in ourselves and in the horizons, pointing to something Greater. Something in which is the source of all it and unites all possible levels of value.

The only way to measure it is to gain vision from the vision of the Creator, the closer it is to the vision of the absolute, the closer it is to making right judgement.

However we all been given a degree of that judgement or would not be able to condemn the likes of Saddam or praise the likes of Mandela.

When we do good acts we are in a state, there is beauty to it if good, we inherit that beauty. The truth is there infinite beauties, but there is beauty that unites all beauty, and there is souls that are upon that united beauty. It's they who manifest God the most, reminding us of God's unity thereby. But we can never grasp their value in that way God values them, because only God can see himself.

Imam Ja`far as-Sadiq (as) said: "Surely, we have revealed it on the Night of value." (97:1) The night is Fatima al-Zahra, and the Value is God. Whoever recognizes Fatima in her rightful manner will have comprehended the Night of Value. She was named Fatima because the Creation has been prevented (fatamu) from recognizing her [fully]."
 

KWED

Scratching head, scratching knee
Yes. We wouldn't even estimate who we are without knowing there is an accurate reality to who we are, and we wouldn't have a accurate reality without God. We need to exist in his vision for an accurate reality since only his judgement can define us.
That is just an unsupported assertion.
Why does the reality of who we are require the existence of a god?

The thing is, we exist and we have an understanding of who we are. That is a fact.
Whether a god exists or not is what you are trying to prove, so you can't simply assume it in your initial premise.
If god does not exist, and we have an understanding of who we are, then god is not required for us to have an understanding of who we are.
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Why does the reality of who we are require the existence of a god?

Judgment and value are interlinked. Either brain judges us or something else. I say brain can't give us truth of who we are because it's us deciding and imperfect judgment.

I further say, it's only God that can judge us and see us exactly as we are. That is our accurate reality (in his vision) while we only estimate who we are with our relative capacity. The relative capacity is not a way to truly know the true judgment of who we are.
 

KWED

Scratching head, scratching knee
It's not about how,
I disagree. If we are to establish the existence of something, we need to know how to do that.

we talked about how the soul can see soul. It's about if we do or not.
No, we didn't talk about it. You merely asserted it.
I don't even know what a soul is or how we are supposed to establish if it even exists. And you don't seem to be able to explain it.
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I disagree. If we are to establish the existence of something, we need to know how to do that.

No, we didn't talk about it. You merely asserted it.
I don't even know what a soul is or how we are supposed to establish if it even exists. And you don't seem to be able to explain it.

If a soul exists, it being able to detect the soul is easy to know. It's metaphysical by nature and able to sense what it is and spiritual nature of itself.
 

KWED

Scratching head, scratching knee
Judgment and value are interlinked.
yes, but that does not require the supernatural. We can and do assign value.

Either brain judges us or something else.
All the available evidence suggests it is the brain (mind). There is no evidence that there even is something independent of the physical brain.

I say brain can't give us truth of who we are because it's us deciding and imperfect judgment.
Who is claiming that our understanding of ourselves, our values, our judgement is "perfect"?
Why does it have to be perfect?

I further say, it's only God that can judge us and see us exactly as we are. That is our accurate reality while we only estimate who we are.
That is your opinion, but seems to be based on flawed premises.
 
Top