Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You haven't tested it.
I could not find the one you are using. Please post a link.You are mixing the hadiths.
1. I'd be surprised if it was that high.Anyways, a person once did a study on how scientifically accurate are the "medical" advice of Imams (a) in hadiths. About 60% were accurate, and 40% not scientifically accurate if I recall correctly. And that is what we expect since you have some people fabricating hadiths and other people truthful.
Guys calm down. No one is gonna leave Islam from this thread and no one is gonna enter due to it lol.
No, you claim it says that. You have yet to provide a link to the actual text.The one in Tafsir hassan al-Askari (a) says which one is dominant.
Ok well the first part seems pretty circular to be honest. However can you demonstrate any objective that a soul exists? Otherwise what knowledge are you claiming its existence is based on? If one makes a claim to knowledge, then this would need to demonstrate or shared, otherwise it wouldn't seem to constitute knowledge, but rather a subjective belief or experience.It does. It means if there is a soul, then we know what a soul is. The question is not about how we would know or not. It's then about if do we know or not.
That was pretty difficult to follow. (You seemed sleepy and distracted. Had it been a long day?)
That's quote some cherry-picking you are doing there!A different chain then the one I am talking about. Two different hadiths.
Get some rest.I am not sure. You guys really might like it more because we can't eat it. Psychological I'm "non-Muslim" factor, they miss out on bacon factor.
Were you saying that without the existence of a god we can't have an understanding of who we are?
And how do we detect this?It's light that has value from God or darkness.. or mix.
And how do we detect this?
That is just an unsupported assertion.Yes. We wouldn't even estimate who we are without knowing there is an accurate reality to who we are, and we wouldn't have a accurate reality without God. We need to exist in his vision for an accurate reality since only his judgement can define us.
Why does the reality of who we are require the existence of a god?
I disagree. If we are to establish the existence of something, we need to know how to do that.It's not about how,
No, we didn't talk about it. You merely asserted it.we talked about how the soul can see soul. It's about if we do or not.
I'm sure you know already.What even is "a soul"?
I disagree. If we are to establish the existence of something, we need to know how to do that.
No, we didn't talk about it. You merely asserted it.
I don't even know what a soul is or how we are supposed to establish if it even exists. And you don't seem to be able to explain it.
yes, but that does not require the supernatural. We can and do assign value.Judgment and value are interlinked.
All the available evidence suggests it is the brain (mind). There is no evidence that there even is something independent of the physical brain.Either brain judges us or something else.
Who is claiming that our understanding of ourselves, our values, our judgement is "perfect"?I say brain can't give us truth of who we are because it's us deciding and imperfect judgment.
That is your opinion, but seems to be based on flawed premises.I further say, it's only God that can judge us and see us exactly as we are. That is our accurate reality while we only estimate who we are.