Yes that was a common creation story, It's from the Mesopotamian creation story -
"
Genesis 1–11 as a whole is imbued with Mesopotamian myths.
[17][21] Genesis 1 bears both striking differences from and striking similarities to
Babylon's national creation myth, the
Enuma Elish.
[18] On the side of similarities, both begin from a stage of chaotic waters before anything is created, in both a fixed dome-shaped "firmament" divides these waters from the habitable Earth, and both conclude with the creation of a human called "man" and the building of a temple for the god (in Genesis 1, this temple is the entire cosmos)."
Genesis creation narrative - Wikipedia
Right except you denied the evolutionary process in this thread? So that's weird. Generally when you oppose some science that has ridiculous amounts of evidence, in a debate forum, then that's what it's about? But ok, not about that then.
Right, astronomy and embryos existed when the Quran was written. People were beginning to form understandings of both. So if the Quran mentions something that was far beyond the science of the time, like neutron stars then great. Can you provide some evidence?
That's great that you have a belief and you think a book is a fact. There are over 1 billion Hindu who also have a belief and have a book of "facts". Same for Christianity. I'm not super interested in what your standards of evidence are, but ok? I'm asking for evidence. The thread is titled "Ask about Islam" and you answer to my query regarding evidence is you don't need scientific evidences.
Cool, neither do any religions.
They all also say they are all fact. So do you have any evidence?