• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Ask Angellous about his beliefs (Christianity)

  • Thread starter angellous_evangellous
  • Start date
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
SoliDeoGloria said:
Can you please explain why in detail? BTW For you to need a separate thread for explaining your own personal interpretatin of "christianity" says quite a bit in itself.

Sincerely,
SoliDeoGloria
Background to this question and ad hominim are available at http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/showthread.php?t=27726&page=2&pp=10

I was very rudely asked:

SoliDeoGloria said:
Have you read books like "The Case for Faith: or "The Case for Creation" by Lee Strobel? Or do you know the Philosophical history of Science? I find it very suprising for one who claims to be a "Christian" can make such statements. It makes me wonder if you truly know the history of Theism,Natural Theology, or Christian Apologetics or the strides that have been made in these areas as of late? If you do, then I would definitely like to know how exactly you can come to this conclusion.
With what can only be an ad hominim attack on my Christian character and confession:

SoliDeoGloria said:
Oh well, I guess the term "christian" is used pretty losely anymore, especially in this website.
To which I responded:

Angellous said:
This little quib is uncalled for, baseless, and rude. If you would like to know anything about me personally, you can post your questions or comments here.
To which if there was any doubt as to the original attack, this was added:

SoliDeoGloria said:
I am curious as to which "christian creeds" you are reffering to. Even if you affirmed genuine Christian creeds, that does not necessarily make you a "christian" (James 2:19). The funniest thing is that by claiming to be a "christian" you also affirm Monotheism which is a Philosophy.
and finally:

SoliDeoGloria said:
BTW For you to need a separate thread for explaining your own personal interpretatin of "christianity" says quite a bit in itself.
Yes, one of the reasons that I created this thread so that people who cannot stick to the OP of threads and choose to attack me can speak to me about stuff like this.
 

Ody

Well-Known Member
Angellous... what sect of christianity to you think matches your beliefs to the greatest degree?
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
Can you please explain why in detail? BTW For you to need a separate thread for explaining your own personal interpretatin of "christianity" says quite a bit in itself.


(Why Angellous rejects Chrsitian Apologetics)

Of course.



The creeds are an authoritative interpretation of who God is, what the Church is, and what the Bible means that are definitive and normative for orthodox Christianity. If I didn't affirm the creeds, I could not call myself a Christian. So I affirm the basic Christian creeds: the Nichene creed and the Athanasian creed. This means that I confess that God is One, and revealed in Christ as the Trinity, the supernatural/metaphysical Creator of the world. God is supernatural because if God is the Creator, God exists above nature.



Consistent with Scripture, God is the Creator and not a part of nature (Gen. 1.1). Thus, God is available to humanity only on God’s terms, being inaccessible completely by means of all of humanity’s tools that are designed for the evaluation of nature: science and philosophy (here I deny that metaphysics can be reviewed by philosophy because there is no evidence for the metaphysical). So Christianity (or any religion for that matter that claims a divinity) is not the result of scientific review (which, of course, must assume naturalism), unless we somehow have a myth-less religion that is science itself.



Knowing fully that I am confessing that God exists, and knowing that Christianity is a revealed religion, I know historically that humanity's knowledge of God is not the product of philosophy or science. No one observed God scientifically or came up with the idea of God philosophically on their own. God revealed God to humanity through the prophets.



Otherwise, if we had discovered God by science or philosophy, then we could determine how we relate to God. Being that God created humanity, God “discovered” us, so God gets to make the rules.



I do not deny that Christianity, being a revealed religion, has a philosophy. Philosophy is simply a logical model by which we interpret information. Christian doctrine is a philosophy, but it is not the product of philosophy if God has truly revealed God, which I confess, and no one can prove by reason.



With reason, evidence must match conclusions. Since there is no physical proof for the metaphysical Creator, God cannot be shown to exist like everything that we know. Therefore, no Christian apologist can argue that belief in God is rational. If belief in the Christian God were the product of reason and not the product of God, then we could. Also, if we could find God by means of logic, we would not need faith and we would have a works-based religion.



Once we add faith into the picture, it violates the rules of logic because a premise must be true in order to be valid. If the goal of Christian apologetics is to prove that the Christian faith is logical or that God exists, it is doomed from the beginning.
 

waacman

Restoration of everything
What does your signature mean, and how does it apply to your worldview as a Christian?
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
AlanGurvey said:
Angellous... what sect of christianity to you think matches your beliefs to the greatest degree?
First of all, the group must fit within the confines of normative Christianity. That is, the sect must have a positive relationship with the Nichene and Athanasian creed to be most like Angellous's interpretation of Christianity.

At the moment I am attending a Cumberland Presbyterian church, but I can't say how much my interpetation of Christianity matches their particular confession. I preach regularly in very conservative Baptist churches and they can't tell the difference. :eek: All they know is I'm not dispensational and that usually is just fine.
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
waacman said:
What does your signature mean, and how does it apply to your worldview as a Christian?
Waacman,

I greatly appreciate that you related this question to the OP. Quite frankly, I'm flattered. Please accept my humblest apologies for not answering your question at this time. I am glad that you noticed my signature.

Reason: I enjoy keeping the meaning of my signature and how it applies to my worldview as a Christian a mystery. It gives me too much pleasure to have people wondering what it means...:p I thought about sending you the answer in a PM, but I have to keep this classified. If I ever change it, I will post a thread on its meaning. If you really want the anwer, I might respond to a petition.:takeabow:

AE
 

Steve

Active Member
angellous_evangellous said:
I have no reason to believe that I will go to heaven when I die. I can only have faith in God and hope for the best. When I die, I'll be just as surprised as everyone else. I'll be thankful for any mercy that I receive from the Maker. May God have mercy on us all!
Hi angellous_evangellous,
Im curious what Christs crucifixion means to you. Dont you suppose thats the reason for christians believing they will go to heaven when they die?
Do you believe Christ paid for you sin on the cross, made atonement for you - so you can be confident you are going to heaven? What does Christs sacrifice personally mean to you?
 

ashai

Active Member
angellous_evangellous said:
God is supernatural because if God is the Creator, God exists above nature. .
Ushta Angellous

Well if God is Omnipresent , S/He is immanent by definition. Therefore S/He is not supernatural. S/He is both in and outside the Cosmos, but that does not mean that 'outside the Cosmos', is unnatural , or over nature or Super natural. This is an area of Biblical doctrine that is underplayed , but the Bible does make the case for an Omnipresent God,. which means of course means an immanent one.

Of course that does not make the Bble right, just more in tune with its religious roots.

Ushta te
Ashai
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
Steve said:
Hi angellous_evangellous,
Im curious what Christs crucifixion means to you. Dont you suppose thats the reason for christians believing they will go to heaven when they die?
Do you believe Christ paid for you sin on the cross, made atonement for you - so you can be confident you are going to heaven? What does Christs sacrifice personally mean to you?
Steve, thanks for the question.

I've been working towards a more communal theology of the cross. From my POV, Christ died for the sins of the entire world. Western thought has become ultra-individualistic, and Westerners often reflect on the cross individualistically. That is, Christ died for my sins, and my sins put him on the cross, and I believe so I can be saved.In my preaching and research, I have been emphasizing that Christ died for the entire human community. Christ is our hope, our sacrafice. As a member of the human community, Christ is my hope.

I have no confidence in going to heaven, and IMHO, niether does anyone else. We don't know what will happen when we die. By faith, I trust that the apostles saw Jesus resurrected from the dead. All that I have is faith and hope in Christ, and faith and hope have proven to be very powerful aspects of human life.
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
ashai said:
Ushta Angellous

Well if God is Omnipresent , S/He is immanent by definition. Therefore S/He is not supernatural. S/He is both in and outside the Cosmos, but that does not mean that 'outside the Cosmos', is unnatural , or over nature or Super natural. This is an area of Biblical doctrine that is underplayed , but the Bible does make the case for an Omnipresent God,. which means of course means an immanent one.

Of course that does not make the Bble right, just more in tune with its religious roots.

Ushta te
Ashai
:kissbette I don't detect a question here. Thanks for posting...
 

Steve

Active Member
angellous_evangellous said:
Steve, thanks for the question.

I've been working towards a more communal theology of the cross. From my POV, Christ died for the sins of the entire world. Western thought has become ultra-individualistic, and Westerners often reflect on the cross individualistically. That is, Christ died for my sins, and my sins put him on the cross, and I believe so I can be saved.In my preaching and research, I have been emphasizing that Christ died for the entire human community. Christ is our hope, our sacrafice. As a member of the human community, Christ is my hope.

I have no confidence in going to heaven, and IMHO, niether does anyone else. We don't know what will happen when we die. By faith, I trust that the apostles saw Jesus resurrected from the dead. All that I have is faith and hope in Christ, and faith and hope have proven to be very powerful aspects of human life.
Hi angellous_evangellous, thats an interesting view.
However it leaves me wondering a few things regarding such a view eg where does it leave personal repentants etc that Christ emphasised so much esspecially if one personally dosnt think they need Christ or have sinned?
How do Jesus's warnings such as "Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it." Mathew 7:13-14 fit in?
What about our sin being punished in hell, Christ spoke and warned more about hell then he spoke about heaven.
Does Christs sacrifice apply to those who reject him and instead live for themselves and sin etc.
Also when you talk about individualistic thought regarding believing and being saved, how else do you suppose we can believe? I cant believe for someone else and have them saved - we are only in control of ourselves not others in regards to what choose etc.
And when you say that Christ died for our entire human community, does that mean you believe everyone will be saved no matter what they believe and what they have done? - and if so again how does hell and verses like Mathew 7:13-14 fit in?

I believe Christs death provided the atonement we need to escape hell but we have the freewill to either accept it or reject it. When you say "I have no confidence in going to heaven, and IMHO, niether does anyone else." i disagree with the later part (that niether does anyone else), quite simply because i know its wrong - i really do have confidence of going to heaven. But as ive said many times its not because ive been good enough etc because i know i havnt - im just confident that Christs sacrifice was sufficient for me and anyone else who repents and trusts in him as their saviour.

Regards
Steve
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
Steve said:
Hi angellous_evangellous, thats an interesting view.
Ok.

However it leaves me wondering a few things regarding such a view

where does it leave personal repentants etc that Christ emphasised so much esspecially if one personally dosnt think they need Christ or have sinned?
I don't know where you got this from reading my response. My view on the cross does not exclude personal repentance. We need Christ personally as the community is made up of individuals.

How do Jesus's warnings such as "Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it." Mathew 7:13-14 fit in?
I can't see how this applies to my response, either.

What about our sin being punished in hell, Christ spoke and warned more about hell then he spoke about heaven.
I guess we had better be good then.

Does Christs sacrifice apply to those who reject him and instead live for themselves and sin etc.
Romans 8-9

Also when you talk about individualistic thought regarding believing and being saved, how else do you suppose we can believe? I cant believe for someone else and have them saved - we are only in control of ourselves not others in regards to what choose etc.
That's true. You can only believe for yourself, but you are not alone. The highly individualized Protestants say, "If you were the only one, X would die for you..." (boo-hoo-hoo). The fact of the matter is, the cross event is so important that X draws all humans to his sacrafice to redeem everyone. The hope for the entire world is centered on the cross of Christ. Also, you do not believe alone. Everyone approaches the cross together, it is the community, the Church that believes in Christ. No one believes alone.

Secondly, belief in Christ is not an individual choice. God gives the faith needed, and God chooses who will be saved. In the end (and the beginning, it is all the choice of God). Many who said Lord, Lord, will be judged; and many who rejected Christ will receive God's mercy.

18So then he has mercy on whomever he wills, and he hardens whomever he wills.


19You will say to me then, "Why does he still find fault? For who can resist his will?" 20But who are you, O man, to answer back to God? Will what is molded say to its molder, "Why have you made me like this?" 21Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honored use and another for dishonorable use? 22What if God, desiring to show his wrath and to make known his power, has endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, 23in order to make known the riches of his glory for vessels of mercy, which he has prepared beforehand for glory-- 24even us whom he has called, not from the Jews only but also from the Gentiles? 25As indeed he says in Hosea,

"Those who were not my people I will call 'my people,'
and her who was not beloved I will call 'beloved.'"
26"And in the very place where it was said to them, 'You are not my people,'
there they will be called 'sons of the living God.'"


And when you say that Christ died for our entire human community, does that mean you believe everyone will be saved no matter what they believe and what they have done? - and if so again how does hell and verses like Mathew 7:13-14 fit in?
I thought that I was at least clear about this. God will choose to give salvation through Christ to whomever He chooses.
====

Steve,

You posted this question:

Hi angellous_evangellous,
Im curious what Christs crucifixion means to you. Dont you suppose thats the reason for christians believing they will go to heaven when they die?
Do you believe Christ paid for you sin on the cross, made atonement for you - so you can be confident you are going to heaven? What does Christs sacrifice personally mean to you?
To which I answered:

angellous said:
Steve, thanks for the question.

I've been working towards a more communal theology of the cross. From my POV, Christ died for the sins of the entire world. Western thought has become ultra-individualistic, and Westerners often reflect on the cross individualistically. That is, Christ died for my sins, and my sins put him on the cross, and I believe so I can be saved.In my preaching and research, I have been emphasizing that Christ died for the entire human community. Christ is our hope, our sacrafice. As a member of the human community, Christ is my hope.

I have no confidence in going to heaven, and IMHO, niether does anyone else. We don't know what will happen when we die. By faith, I trust that the apostles saw Jesus resurrected from the dead. All that I have is faith and hope in Christ, and faith and hope have proven to be very powerful aspects of human life.
Now we have this:

Steve said:
I believe Christs death provided the atonement we need to escape hell but we have the freewill to either accept it or reject it. When you say "I have no confidence in going to heaven, and IMHO, niether does anyone else." i disagree with the later part (that niether does anyone else), quite simply because i know its wrong - i really do have confidence of going to heaven. But as ive said many times its not because ive been good enough etc because i know i havnt - im just confident that Christs sacrifice was sufficient for me and anyone else who repents and trusts in him as their saviour.

Regards
Steve
I'm glad that you have shared your views on this topic.

IMHO, Christ did not die so that we could feel warm and fuzzy knowing that we get to party after death. Frankly, I don't understand how or why you apparently expected me to provide your interpretation of Christianity when you asked me the question. Christianity is not a religion for the dead, but for the living. If not, we are just fire insurance salesmen - but the fire insurance only kicks in after death. Who really needs that?
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
readingowl said:
If there is no proof that God exists, do you believe in God solely based on faith?
Yes. If God could be discovered by science or philosophy, then we would not need faith to believe in God. God would simply be a demonstratably proven reality, and we could determine how we would relate to God. However, God, as the Divine Creator, discovered us, and gets to make the rules.

Also, If we will all be judged by God when we die, what does he base his judgment on? Is it based on works or on faith or on a combination of both or is it impossible for us to know?
I do believe that we will be judged when we die, because I believe that God spoke to humanity through the prophets in the Hebrew Bible and in the New Testament. Every one of us will be judged according to our works, and one of our works is faith. May God have mercy on us all!

EDIT: I classify faith as a work - I do affirm that faith is a gift from God to every person, but it it is a work because we have to actually do something with it to get anything from it.:eek:
 

Steve

Active Member
angellous_evangellous said:
Yes. If God could be discovered by science or philosophy, then we would not need faith to believe in God. God would simply be a demonstratably proven reality, and we could determine how we would relate to God. However, God, as the Divine Creator, discovered us, and gets to make the rules.
Actually the bible makes it clear that we can know their is a God because its so obvious from that which he has made.
For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities-his eternal power and divine nature-have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. Romans 1:20
Faith in God has more to do with our faith in who God is and his character, not if there is a God.
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
Steve said:
Actually the bible makes it clear that we can know their is a God because its so obvious from that which he has made.
For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities-his eternal power and divine nature-have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. Romans 1:20


Faith in God has more to do with our faith in who God is and his character, not if there is a God.
Obviously I disagree that Paul meant that we can discover God by means of science and philosophy.

Words can't express how much I disagree with your second statement Faith in God has more to do with our faith in who God is and his character, not if there is a God. If we could discover God by means of science and philosophy, then we could discover God's character without faith. This is where both your definition of faith and your interpretation of Romans 1 is inconsistent.

I will be able to post more later.
 
Top