It's interesting to consider the relationship between logical inference as the core of a philosophical approach to understanding God with the intellect on the one hand, and the mystical approach of leaving beyond logic and the mind altogether to join in blissful unity. Personally, I think one can do one without the other, but that they can also work very well together in a mature system. In fact, I think for some people they need to - without the logical philosophical approach complementing the surrendering, loving approach I don't think I'd have much of a leg to stand on, as the former provides a needed foundation upon which the latter can be developed. Development ultimately reaches a state, I understand, where you realise you were already there to begin with
That's an interesting perspective, albeit one I don't personally share. I think, however, that if it works for you, that's the main thing. As for myself, I think intellectually studying these things is quite appropriate for someone (such as myself most days) who wants to intellectually understand them -- at least to the extent that's possible. But if I wanted to experience these things, I'd take another approach -- most likely meditation, etc. However, that's just me. Everyone must find their own way, I think.
I'd like to share a quick story in relation to that, which you may have heard before:
A woman had spent the day at a friend's house, and had just got home when she realised she'd left her necklace there. She immediately ran back to her friend's house, only for her friend to point out to her that in fact she was already wearing the necklace, and had been all along.
Begging the question, did she need to have run to her friend's house to find the necklace?
I've never heard that story before, but it's perfect. Thanks for sharing that!
A key thing to this is that the Absolute (I can say God, or Shiva, or whatever) is not two, there is no duality. Whereas in the everyday world of appearances there is certainly duality, there is me and you, there is this jar-standing-in-for-a-mug and drink within it, etc. That could be 'the mundane'.
That strikes me as an excellent way of distinguishing between the two. I use a different definition of "spiritual", but it strikes me how related it is to your distinction. Like looking at much the same thing from two different angles.