• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Assange has been released. He is now free: what do you think?

Julian Assange is a free man, now. Are you happy for him?


  • Total voters
    10

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
No idea what you think that video was supposed to explain about the email.
With all due respect, but you are supposed to discuss the content of the email and the content of that video.

In my country we usually explain ourselves when we say "you're wrong".

We don't say "we're wrong, I am right, Period.".
You need to back up your affirmations.
 

McBell

Admiral Obvious
With all due respect, but you are supposed to discuss the content of the email and the content of that video.

In my country we usually explain ourselves when we say "you're wrong".

We don't say "we're wrong, I am right, Period.".
You need to back up your affirmations.
With all due respect, you have not supported your bold empty claim.
In fact, you are going to great lengths to avoid supporting your claim.

Now, IF you honestly think the stuff you have presented support your claim, I have no idea what to tell you.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
With all due respect, you have not supported your bold empty claim.
In fact, you are going to great lengths to avoid supporting your claim.

Now, IF you honestly think the stuff you have presented support your claim, I have no idea what to tell you.
Can I imitate you?
EF: me
MB= u

EF: Well...I think two times two is four.
MB: No, I am sorry, but you have not supported this claim. It's an empty claim.
EF: Okay, but at least tell me why it is wrong.
MB: I have already said it. The stuff you have presented doesn't support your claim.
EF: Ok...but at least tell me the right solution.
MB: You have failed supporting your bold, empty, claim. Period.

Are you gaslighting me, by chance? :)
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
And the email linked merely shows that he had the funding to get it done.
It mentions nothing about plans or even suggesting implying killing him.
I asked you to tell me why Sarkozy attacked Libya.
 
Last edited:

McBell

Admiral Obvious
Can I imitate you?
EF: me
MB= u

EF: Well...I think two times two is four.
MB: No, I am sorry, but you have not supported this claim. It's an empty claim.
EF: Okay, but at least tell me why it is wrong.
MB: I have already said it. The stuff you have presented doesn't support your claim.
EF: Ok...but at least tell me the right solution.
MB: You have failed supporting your bold, empty, claim. Period.

Are you gaslighting me, by chance? :)
If anyone in this thread is gaslighting it is you.

You keep jumping all over the map like a Mexican jumping bean on crack.
You made a claim and have not supported it.

Now if this nonsense is the norm for discussion in your country...
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
If anyone in this thread is gaslighting it is you.

You keep jumping all over the map like a Mexican jumping bean on crack.
You made a claim and have not supported it.

Now if this nonsense is the norm for discussion in your country...
Freudian denial: when someone is given a piece of evidence, and they deny such a piece of evidence exists.
I have showed an email that showed that Sarkozy attacked Libya for several reasons.
One of the reasons is the new currency Gaddafi was creating.
 

Godobeyer

the word "Islam" means "submission" to God
Premium Member
They found him no guilty? Or
he was just a fake agent (mean they used him) for mission!!?
 
Top