Astonishing- Water has Emotions

[Farrukh]

Dr Masaru Emoto, a Japanese scientist who is experimenting on frozen water since 1994, has claimed that water has sense of emotions, it can hear us and can form different crystalline shapes according to what it hears, he has published his findings in the book 'Messages from Water'.
but how all this possible?

 

[The Neo Nerd]

Does the website not tell you?

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

I've heard of that years ago. It's very interesting.

 

[Farrukh]

Does the website not tell you?

no, website is only telling response of crystalline shapes. there is no scientific reason for how it all happens.

 

[chinu]

I think, that's why water turns into tears ?

 

[The Neo Nerd]

no, website is only telling response of crystalline shapes. there is no scientific reason for how it all happens.

Do you have a theory?

 

[Farrukh]

Do you have a theory?

it may be possible if water can understand us, then all other things around us that apparently don't seem to have any sense may have sense of emotion in reality, yet science have to discover how it works.

 

[BSM1]

Wait for it......PETA--People for the Ethical Treatment of Aqua. God help us.

 

[Iti oj]

I would assume it has something to do with frequencies of its real

 

[Valjean]

I'm pretty sure the water in the sink was sneering at me this morning, as I was brushing my teeth...:sarcastic

 

[Revoltingest]

I'm pretty sure the water in the sink was sneering at me this morning, as I was brushing my teeth...:sarcastic

That's what it told me.

 

[9-10ths_Penguin]

Dr Masaru Emoto, a Japanese scientist who is experimenting on frozen water since 1994, has claimed that water has sense of emotions, it can hear us and can form different crystalline shapes according to what it hears, he has published his findings in the book 'Messages from Water'.
but how all this possible?

Have you ever heard the expression "unique snowflake"? Water crystals freeze in a huge variety of shapes naturally. If you freeze two ice crystals, they'll be different whether or no you play a Korean folk song to one and "Imagine" to another. Are his results repeatable?

 

[4consideration]

Dr Masaru Emoto, a Japanese scientist who is experimenting on frozen water since 1994, has claimed that water has sense of emotions, it can hear us and can form different crystalline shapes according to what it hears, he has published his findings in the book 'Messages from Water'.
but how all this possible?

I haven't followed his work in the last few years, but did look into it some about 7 years ago. I found it quite interesting.

My understanding is not so much water was found to have emotions, but that his photographing of the water crystals showed that strong emotions directed toward the water seemed to have an impact on the photographed structure of the water crystals -- that their form responded to various qualities of energy.

I took from that an indication that the water may respond to the quality of energy directed to it, and also from Dr. Emoto's work, since people are mostly water, seems to have a possible implication for consciously affecting health related matters from the quality of thoughts/emotions/energy that we generate and absorb from others.

Additionally, as I recall he did some experiments with water quality due to pollution, and indicated improvement in water quality from directing prayer/love with an intent to heal the polluted water. (I think it may be the before and after prayer photographs on that site from Fujiwara dam that I am recalling the story of.)

It is my understanding that, if there is a signatory vibration to the energy we generate outward (which I think there is) that implies for me a high level of personal responsibility for what we "put out there", and that we do actually impact those people and "things" with the quality of energy we send them. We already know from physics that everything vibrates. Perhaps we will be more aware of our own ability to consciously direct the quality of and the level at which we personally vibrate if we can see physical representations of how it affects things around us.

 

[George-ananda]

I haven't followed his work in the last few years, but did look into it some about 7 years ago. I found it quite interesting.

My wonderment in all this is all how interesting things like this seem to just drop and go nowhere. But something like the Higgs-Boson which no lay person can understand gets such amazing attention. Yes, I'm saying there is a prejudice in the scientific community against things which challenge their current materialist worldview. Positive and negative thoughts effecting so-called 'inanimate' objects does not fit in the mainstream scientific view of the universe.

 

[4consideration]

My wonderment in all this is all how interesting things like this seem to just drop and go nowhere. But something like the Higgs-Boson which no lay person can understand gets such amazing attention. Yes, I'm saying there is a prejudice in the scientific community against things which challenge their current materialist worldview. Positive and negative thoughts effecting so-called 'inanimate' objects does not fit in the mainstream scientific view of the universe.

I don't know that they really do drop. Maybe. Maybe not. Maybe whatever new information he has found will be forwarded in his ongoing work, or maybe as a source of inspiration for someone else to research in a similar way, with different tools and techniques -- perhaps in a more demonstrably conclusive sort of way.

I look at it like, some things are considered sort of "fringe" because there is no real substance, or incorrect conclusions are drawn, or some important information is left out. And some things represent a glimpse at the next leap of understanding that are simply unrecognizable as valuable to some who are so well schooled in the current level of understanding on a subject that they cannot see the current level of understanding also probably contains some misunderstanding, or lack of understanding, which limits and provides the boundaries for why we don't know some of the things yet to be known.

I think that even the smartest people, who can give the most detailed accounting of what's in the box, often do so from inside the box. I think that's how human tend to operate.

(My guess is that probably applies to all, or most of us, myself included -- in some areas of our own lives.)

I'm probably not coming up with any great scientific leap in my lifetime. I think it's interesting to watch others explore different areas, though.

 

[9-10ths_Penguin]

My wonderment in all this is all how interesting things like this seem to just drop and go nowhere. But something like the Higgs-Boson which no lay person can understand gets such amazing attention. Yes, I'm saying there is a prejudice in the scientific community against things which challenge their current materialist worldview. Positive and negative thoughts effecting so-called 'inanimate' objects does not fit in the mainstream scientific view of the universe.

Plate tectonics didn't fit in the mainstream scientific view when it was first proposed. Neither did the idea that a meteor impact caused the extinction of the dinosaurs. It's not paradigm-shifting ideas that are rejected; it's ones with poor support.

 

[George-ananda]

Plate tectonics didn't fit in the mainstream scientific view when it was first proposed. Neither did the idea that a meteor impact caused the extinction of the dinosaurs. It's not paradigm-shifting ideas that are rejected; it's ones with poor support.

No, this is paradigm shifting. Your examples are not; they fit nicely inside the box.

 

[Curious George]

Dr Masaru Emoto, a Japanese scientist who is experimenting on frozen water since 1994, has claimed that water has sense of emotions, it can hear us and can form different crystalline shapes according to what it hears, he has published his findings in the book 'Messages from Water'.
but how all this possible?

No, it does not.

 

[Gjallarhorn]

Looks like silliness to me.

 

[Iti oj]

No, this is paradigm shifting. Your examples are not; they fit nicely inside the box.

you assume meta. Why couldnt the cause be materialistic?