For some, at least, creation is "the birth of beast."
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Atheism: The Great Nothing!
- Thread starter mickiel
- Start date
Kilgore Trout
Misanthropic Humanist
No, you've swallowed this business of lying about evolutionary theory.
The people that believe these moronic lies about evolutionary theory, are, in fact, the same people that claim to believe in creationism.
mickiel
Well-Known Member
Well I understand and agree.
The birth of the beast is worth a post within itself.
Peace.
We are animals ourselves. Animals with a slightly notable abstraction capability and the power of language, but still very much animals. Denying that is rather pointless.
As for believing in creationism, that poses some very major challenges, such as for instance how to explain all the failed creations; how and why do deny the evidence of evolutionism; and why would a god-designed proccess prove so damned faulty, to the point of allowing for people to die out of blood incompatibility with their own mothers and even to be born without a functional brain.
If Creationism is true, then God has some major explaining to do.
mickiel
Well-Known Member
Well I agree, an explination is needed.
I just don't see anyone other than God who is able to explain it.
Peace.
That assumes that Creationism is true, however. Which is unlikely at best.
mickiel
Well-Known Member
Well again I agree, its just that we need to know more than we do.
I only wish I knew more.
Peace.
Venatoris
Active Member
The first step is admitting you have a problem.
mickiel
Well-Known Member
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Biology is haaaaaaaaaaaard.
You clearly have no idea what the theory of evolution even is, yet you still try to debate it? Humans are animals. We're certainly not vegetable or mineral.
You so want to get into this.
Last edited:
The Neo Nerd
Well-Known Member
I'm sorry i don't mean to be glib or sarcastic.
But your inability to understand something does NOT immediately mean that god did it.
-Q
mickiel
Well-Known Member
Humans are not animals in my view. An animal ia an animal, a human is a human, two entirely different lifeforms.
Peace.
DeitySlayer
President of Chindia
Can you please indicate what separates a human from an animal.
EDIT: Oh, and hi btw
Haven't seen you around for a bit. Hope you're well.
jarofthoughts
Empirical Curmudgeon
With this comment you have illustrated that you are delusional, uneducated and ignorant. I think it is safe to ignore your comments until further notice.
For those who think I am being harsh:
Delusion: a belief or impression maintained despite being contradicted by reality or rational argument.
Uneducated: having or showing a poor level of education.
Ignorant: lacking knowledge or awareness; uneducated or unsophisticated.
mickiel
Well-Known Member
Can you please indicate what separates a human from an animal.
EDIT: Oh, and hi btw
I am pleased to do as such;
Humans hold Consciousness which is far advanced from animals.
Humans have advanced language; as well as;
Technology; Animals cannot invent technology.
Humans can read and write at levels its impossible for animals to even do.
Humans can build and construct things that no animal ever has or ever will be able to do; --WHY, because our Consciousness is totally different and far superior to animals, we are not continious with the idiot heirarchacy of speechless apes.
Humans can create and build on their creations, animals can do no such thing at our levels.
Humans can create, design and build vechicles, then drive them, it is IMPOSSIBLE for an animal to do that. And Idiotic to suggest that they could.
Humans have religion, NO animal has a religion.
Peace.
DeitySlayer
President of Chindia
Including the mentally retarded?
There are Amazonian tribes with vocabularies under 100 words. A gorilla called Koko was able to use a wide range of sign language, and even combine existing signs to create new words; e.g. 'water' and 'fruit' for a watermelon.
Define technology? Earliest humans were using sticks and rocks. Apes use sticks and rocks. Are you saying that people with higher levels of technology are more human in some way?
Mentally retarded people can't. Does that exclude them from being 'human'?
So essentially, because we are more intelligent, we are human. But if we are judging by intelligence, that would exclude the mentally retarded.
US scientists can also outmatch Amazonian tribes at 'creating' and 'building' at an incredible disparity. Again, does that make Amazonian tribes inferior?
Ah. So we weren't human until the bicycle was invented?
I don't have a religion. Does that make me not human?
--------
See, Mickiel, here's your problem.
You are asked where the boundary lies between animals and humans.
You respond by giving a list of things that animals can't do.
But there are also humans who can't do these things, which you still classify as human.
I assume your comeback will be 'But most humans can'
Then we're back to square one.
How do you define humans? You can't say 'the majority of X are Y' until you first define X. And you can't define X by saying the majority can do Y, because X remains undefined.
PolyHedral
Superabacus Mystic
Animals do have superstition, though, which is the beginning of religion.
I.S.L.A.M617
Illuminatus
Humans are just really smart animals.
mickiel
Well-Known Member
Many evolutionist have tried to argue that humans are 99% simular chemically to apes, and I agree that blood precipitation test do actually indicate that the chimpanzee is our closest relative. Yet reguarding that we must also then accept the following;
Milk chemistry test indicates that the Donkey is mans closest relative.
Cholestrol level test indicate that the Garter Snake is mans closest relative.
Tear enzyme chemistry indicates that the Chicken is mans closest relative.
Listen, on the basics of another recent blood chemistry test, the Butter Bean is mans closest relative.
I consider such things as baseless induendo, just useless speculation and unreliable at best.
And I am not going for it.
Peace.
Milk chemistry test indicates that the Donkey is mans closest relative.
Cholestrol level test indicate that the Garter Snake is mans closest relative.
Tear enzyme chemistry indicates that the Chicken is mans closest relative.
Listen, on the basics of another recent blood chemistry test, the Butter Bean is mans closest relative.
I consider such things as baseless induendo, just useless speculation and unreliable at best.
And I am not going for it.
Peace.