GiantHouseKey
Well-Known Member
No, I understood what you meant. My response was that that baby is still part of the mother's body, in which case you're telling the mother what to do with her body.
Some animals (including humans) eat some animals when they are not only raw, but still alive. As irrelevent as this might seem, the living animals is considered to be a seperate entity even after they are inside the body of the predatory animal.
Parasites live in a 'host' for at least the majority of their lives. Whilst living inside the organism, they are still considered to be separate from their host.
Although they are inside us they are not actually part of us. The human foetus is still considered by science to be a seperate entity to the mother. Is it your view that the child is not actually considered to be a seperate living being until it is fully born and functioning by itself?
GhK.