Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
LOL! I would suggest that you do the same. Romans almost never took down the bodies of those that they crucified early. They left them up for a very long time. It was part of the punishment. So the first mention we have of this supposed event is in a highly biased source written forty to sixty years after the event by people that were not eyewitnesses to the events. Why give it any credibility? You do not seem to understand the burden of proof in such arguments. You would need to show how the Bible is right. That cannot be done. It is the only source for such claims.Logic it out Sherlock-
Pilate and the priests knew Jesus had claimed he'd rise from the dead, so they rolled a boulder over the tomb entrance and stationed two sentries there to make sure he couldn't get out, and yet he still did, heck not even Penn and Teller could explain it..
Once again, there probably was not tomb. Therefore there would not have been any sentries. Only Matthew, written 50 to 60 years after the event, even has the fantasy of sentries. That simply adds on even more problems.